Export limit exceeded: 341187 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (341187 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-33573 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-03-30 | 8.8 High |
| OpenClaw before 2026.3.11 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the gateway agent RPC that allows authenticated operators with operator.write permission to override workspace boundaries by supplying attacker-controlled spawnedBy and workspaceDir values. Remote operators can escape the configured workspace boundary and execute arbitrary file and exec operations from any process-accessible directory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33619 | 1 Pinchtab | 1 Pinchtab | 2026-03-30 | 4.1 Medium |
| PinchTab is a standalone HTTP server that gives AI agents direct control over a Chrome browser. PinchTab v0.8.3 contains a server-side request forgery issue in the optional scheduler's webhook delivery path. When a task is submitted to `POST /tasks` with a user-controlled `callbackUrl`, the v0.8.3 scheduler sends an outbound HTTP `POST` to that URL when the task reaches a terminal state. In that release, the webhook path validated only the URL scheme and did not reject loopback, private, link-local, or other non-public destinations. Because the v0.8.3 implementation also used the default HTTP client behavior, redirects were followed and the destination was not pinned to validated IPs. This allowed blind SSRF from the PinchTab server to attacker-chosen HTTP(S) targets reachable from the server. This issue is narrower than a general unauthenticated internet-facing SSRF. The scheduler is optional and off by default, and in token-protected deployments the attacker must already be able to submit tasks using the server's master API token. In PinchTab's intended deployment model, that token represents administrative control rather than a low-privilege role. Tokenless deployments lower the barrier further, but that is a separate insecure configuration state rather than impact created by the webhook bug itself. PinchTab's default deployment model is local-first and user-controlled, with loopback bind and token-based access in the recommended setup. That lowers practical risk in default use, even though it does not remove the underlying webhook issue when the scheduler is enabled and reachable. This was addressed in v0.8.4 by validating callback targets before dispatch, rejecting non-public IP ranges, pinning delivery to validated IPs, disabling redirect following, and validating `callbackUrl` during task submission. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33635 | 1 Icalendar | 1 Icalendar | 2026-03-30 | 4.3 Medium |
| iCalendar is a Ruby library for dealing with iCalendar files in the iCalendar format defined by RFC-5545. Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.12.2, .ics serialization does not properly sanitize URI property values, enabling ICS injection through attacker-controlled input, adding arbitrary calendar lines to the output. `Icalendar::Values::Uri` falls back to the raw input string when `URI.parse` fails and later serializes it with `value.to_s` without removing or escaping `\r` or `\n` characters. That value is embedded directly into the final ICS line by the normal serializer, so a payload containing CRLF can terminate the original property and create a new ICS property or component. (It looks like you can inject via url, source, image, organizer, attach, attendee, conference, tzurl because of this). Applications that generate `.ics` files from partially untrusted metadata are impacted. As a result, downstream calendar clients or importers may process attacker-supplied content as if it were legitimate event data, such as added attendees, modified URLs, alarms, or other calendar fields. Version 2.12.2 contains a patch for the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0965 | 2 Libssh, Redhat | 3 Libssh, Enterprise Linux, Openshift | 2026-03-30 | N/A |
| A flaw was found in libssh where it can attempt to open arbitrary files during configuration parsing. A local attacker can exploit this by providing a malicious configuration file or when the system is misconfigured. This vulnerability could lead to a Denial of Service (DoS) by causing the system to try and access dangerous files, such as block devices or large system files, which can disrupt normal operations. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33644 | 1 Lycheeorg | 1 Lychee | 2026-03-30 | N/A |
| Lychee is a free, open-source photo-management tool. Prior to version 7.5.2, the SSRF protection in `PhotoUrlRule.php` can be bypassed using DNS rebinding. The IP validation check (line 86-89) only activates when the hostname is an IP address. When a domain name is used, `filter_var($host, FILTER_VALIDATE_IP)` returns `false`, skipping the entire check. Version 7.5.2 patches the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20416 | 2 Google, Mediatek | 5 Android, Mt6991, Mt6993 and 2 more | 2026-03-30 | 7.2 High |
| In pcie, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10315038 / ALPS10340155; Issue ID: MSV-5155. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20445 | 2 Google, Mediatek | 24 Android, Mt6835, Mt6855 and 21 more | 2026-03-30 | 4.4 Medium |
| In MDDP, there is a possible system crash due to a race condition. This could lead to local denial of service if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10289875; Issue ID: MSV-5184. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20429 | 2 Google, Mediatek | 30 Android, Mt6739, Mt6761 and 27 more | 2026-03-30 | 4.4 Medium |
| In display, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local information disclosure if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10320471; Issue ID: MSV-5535. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20424 | 2 Google, Mediatek | 6 Android, Mt6991, Mt6993 and 3 more | 2026-03-30 | 4.4 Medium |
| In display, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local information disclosure if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10320471; Issue ID: MSV-5540. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20444 | 2 Google, Mediatek | 47 Android, Mt6739, Mt6761 and 44 more | 2026-03-30 | 6.7 Medium |
| In display, there is a possible memory corruption due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10436995; Issue ID: MSV-5721. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20443 | 2 Google, Mediatek | 47 Android, Mt6739, Mt6761 and 44 more | 2026-03-30 | 6.7 Medium |
| In display, there is a possible memory corruption due to use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10436998; Issue ID: MSV-5722. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20442 | 2 Google, Mediatek | 47 Android, Mt6739, Mt6761 and 44 more | 2026-03-30 | 4.4 Medium |
| In display, there is a possible system crash due to use after free. This could lead to local denial of service if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10436998; Issue ID: MSV-5723. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20441 | 2 Google, Mediatek | 6 Android, Mt2718, Mt6899 and 3 more | 2026-03-30 | 6.7 Medium |
| In MAE, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10432500; Issue ID: MSV-5803. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20440 | 2 Google, Mediatek | 6 Android, Mt2718, Mt6899 and 3 more | 2026-03-30 | 6.7 Medium |
| In MAE, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10431968; Issue ID: MSV-5824. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20439 | 2 Google, Mediatek | 6 Android, Mt2718, Mt6899 and 3 more | 2026-03-30 | 4.4 Medium |
| In imgsys, there is a possible system crash due to use after free. This could lead to local denial of service if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10431955; Issue ID: MSV-5826. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20438 | 2 Google, Mediatek | 12 Android, Mt2718, Mt6899 and 9 more | 2026-03-30 | 6.4 Medium |
| In MAE, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10431920; Issue ID: MSV-5835. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20437 | 2 Google, Mediatek | 6 Android, Mt2718, Mt6899 and 3 more | 2026-03-30 | 4.4 Medium |
| In MAE, there is a possible system crash due to use after free. This could lead to local denial of service if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10431940; Issue ID: MSV-5843. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20436 | 1 Mediatek | 8 Mt7902, Mt7920, Mt7921 and 5 more | 2026-03-30 | 6.7 Medium |
| In wlan STA driver, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: WCNCR00473802; Issue ID: MSV-5970. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20435 | 6 Google, Linuxfoundation, Mediatek and 3 more | 40 Android, Yocto, Mt2737 and 37 more | 2026-03-30 | 4.6 Medium |
| In preloader, there is a possible read of device unique identifiers due to a logic error. This could lead to local information disclosure, if an attacker has physical access to the device, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10607099; Issue ID: MSV-6118. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20434 | 1 Mediatek | 99 Lr12a, Lr13, Mt2735 and 96 more | 2026-03-30 | 7.5 High |
| In Modem, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege, if a UE has connected to a rogue base station controlled by the attacker, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. Patch ID: MOLY00782946; Issue ID: MSV-4135. | ||||