| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| wpDiscuz before 7.6.47 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the getFollowsPage() function that allows attackers to trigger unauthorized actions without nonce validation. Attackers can craft malicious requests to enumerate follow relationships and manipulate user follow data by exploiting the missing CSRF protection in the follows page handler. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in shufflehound Lemmony lemmony allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Lemmony: from n/a through < 1.7.1. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in 10Web Photo Gallery by 10Web photo-gallery allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Photo Gallery by 10Web: from n/a through <= 1.8.37. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ays Pro Quiz Maker quiz-maker allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Quiz Maker: from n/a through <= 6.7.1.2. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Magazine3 Easy Table of Contents easy-table-of-contents allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Easy Table of Contents: from n/a through <= 2.0.80. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in desertthemes Corpiva corpiva allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Corpiva: from n/a through <= 1.0.96. |
| Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in joshuae1974 Flash Video Player allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Flash Video Player: from n/a through 5.0.4. |
| OPNsense is a FreeBSD based firewall and routing platform. Prior to 26.1.4, multiple OPNsense MVC API endpoints perform state‑changing operations but are accessible via HTTP GET requests without CSRF protection. The framework CSRF validation in ApiControllerBase only applies to POST/PUT/DELETE methods, allowing authenticated GET requests to bypass CSRF verification. As a result, a malicious website can trigger privileged backend actions when visited by an authenticated user, causing unintended service reloads and configuration changes through configd. This results in an authenticated Cross‑Site Request Forgery vulnerability allowing unauthorized system state changes. This vulnerability is fixed in 26.1.4. |
| Emlog is an open source website building system. In 2.6.6 and earlier, the delete_async action (asynchronous delete) lacks a call to LoginAuth::checkToken(), enabling CSRF attacks. |
| The LatePoint – Calendar Booking Plugin for Appointments and Events plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.2.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the reload_preview() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The divi-booster WordPress plugin before 5.0.2 does not have authorization and CSRF checks in one of its fixing function, allowing unauthenticated users to modify stored divi-booster WordPress plugin before 5.0.2 options. Furthermore, due to the use of unserialize() on the data, this could be further exploited when combined with a PHP gadget chain to achieve PHP Object Injection |
| The Modular DS: Monitor, update, and backup multiple websites plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the postConfirmOauth() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to disconnect the plugin's OAuth/SSO connection via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Add Custom Fields to Media plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on the field deletion functionality in the admin display template. The plugin properly validates a nonce for the 'add field' operation (line 24-36), but the 'delete field' operation (lines 38-49) processes the $_GET['delete'] parameter and calls update_option() without any nonce verification. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary custom media fields via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in TS Webfonts for SAKURA 3.1.2 and earlier allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of a user and to change settings by having a user view a malicious page. |
| A Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in ipa/session/login_password in all supported versions of IPA. This flaw allows an attacker to trick the user into submitting a request that could perform actions as the user, resulting in a loss of confidentiality and system integrity. During community penetration testing it was found that for certain HTTP end-points FreeIPA does not ensure CSRF protection. Due to implementation details one cannot use this flaw for reflection of a cookie representing already logged-in user. An attacker would always have to go through a new authentication attempt. |
| OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.14 contain an oauth state validation bypass vulnerability in the manual Chutes login flow that allows attackers to bypass CSRF protection. An attacker can convince a user to paste attacker-controlled OAuth callback data, enabling credential substitution and token persistence for unauthorized accounts. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in rustdesk-client RustDesk Client rustdesk-client on Windows, MacOS, Linux, iOS, Android (Flutter URI scheme handler, FFI bridge modules) allows Privilege Escalation. This vulnerability is associated with program files flutter/lib/common.Dart, src/flutter_ffi.Rs and program routines URI handler for rustdesk://password/, bind.MainSetPermanentPassword().
This issue affects RustDesk Client: through 1.4.5. |
| Tina4 Stack 1.0.3 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to modify admin user credentials by submitting forged POST requests to the profile endpoint. Attackers can craft HTML forms targeting the /kim/profile endpoint with hidden fields containing malicious user data like passwords and email addresses to update administrator accounts without authentication. |
| Easyndexer 1.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to create administrative accounts by submitting forged POST requests. Attackers can craft malicious web pages that submit POST requests to createuser.php with parameters including username, password, name, surname, and privileges set to 1 for administrator access. |
| The Bread & Butter: Gate content + Capture leads + Collect first-party data + Nurture with Ai agents plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 7.10.1321. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the uploadImage() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files that make remote code execution possible via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
