Export limit exceeded: 381690 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (381690 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-16713 | 1 Ibm | 1 Documentation Offline | 2026-08-17 | 4.3 Medium |
| IBM Documentation Offline 1.0.0 through 1.4.1 IBM Documentation could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to a security misconfiguration where the documentation server binds to an unrestricted IP address. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16094 | 2 Matthiasnordwig, Wordpress | 2 Invisible Anti-spam & Captcha — Recaptcha Alternative For All Forms, Wordpress | 2026-08-17 | 4.9 Medium |
| The Invisible Anti-Spam & CAPTCHA — reCAPTCHA Alternative for All Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to generic SQL Injection via the 'key' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 5.1 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with editor-level access and above, to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16079 | 2 Pdamsten, Wordpress | 2 Fullscreen Galleria, Wordpress | 2026-08-17 | 6.5 Medium |
| The Fullscreen Galleria plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to generic SQL Injection via 'href' Attribute in Post Content in all versions up to, and including, 1.6.12 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16007 | 1 Appflowy-io | 1 Appflowy-cloud | 2026-08-17 | N/A |
| AppFlowy's qcuiknote feature is affected by a SQL injection vulnerability. Authenticated users with access to the feature can inject arbitrary SQL to exfiltrate data in the underlying SQL database. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15351 | 2 Wcvendors, Wordpress | 2 Woocommerce Multi-vendor, Woocommerce Marketplace, Product Vendors, Wordpress | 2026-08-17 | 4.9 Medium |
| The WC Vendors – WooCommerce Multivendor, WooCommerce Marketplace, Product Vendors plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to generic SQL Injection via the 'status' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 2.7.0 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with shop manager-level access and above, to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database. The sanitize_text_field callback strips HTML but leaves SQL metacharacters intact, and wp_magic_quotes slash protection does not apply because WP_REST_Server::serve_request() calls wp_unslash() on GET parameters before the sanitize callback executes. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15066 | 2 Timwhitlock, Wordpress | 2 Loco Translate, Wordpress | 2026-08-17 | 6.4 Medium |
| The Loco Translate plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via PO File Extracted Comments in all versions up to, and including, 2.8.7 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with translator-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13358 | 2 Croixhaug, Wordpress | 2 Simply Schedule Appointments, Wordpress | 2026-08-17 | 6.5 Medium |
| The Appointment Booking Calendar — Simply Schedule Appointments Booking Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 1.6.12.10 via the ssa_past_appointments due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to access appointment records belonging to arbitrary users and harvest the per-appointment ownership tokens (32-character hashes) embedded in the rendered HTML, which can then be used without any authentication to read or modify those appointments including full customer PII such as name, email, phone number, and private notes. The /wp-json/ssa/v1/render-shortcode REST endpoint is registered unconditionally on rest_api_init regardless of whether the Divi theme is installed, and its permission callback only requires current_user_can('edit_posts'), meaning any Contributor-level account is sufficient to trigger this entire exploit chain. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12553 | 1 Hp | 1 Web Jetadmin | 2026-08-17 | N/A |
| HP has identified a potential vulnerability in HP Web Jetadmin (WJA) that may allow an unauthenticated actor to read from or write to arbitrary files through a DLL hijacking mechanism. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12128 | 2 Dotonpaper, Wordpress | 2 Pinpoint Booking System, Wordpress | 2026-08-17 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Pinpoint Booking System – Version 2 plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Price Manipulation via the `cart_data` parameter in all versions up to, and including, 2.9.9.6.8. This is due to the `dopbsp_woocommerce_add_to_cart` AJAX action being registered via `wp_ajax_nopriv_*` with no authentication, no nonce verification, and no server-side recalculation of pricing — the `update` handler reads `price_total` directly from the attacker-controlled `cart_data` POST parameter and persists it to the database via `$wpdb->insert()` without validating it against the calendar's configured pricing. The `woocommerce_before_calculate_totals` callback subsequently reads the stored attacker-supplied value back from the database and passes it directly to `$product->set_price()` without recomputing from calendar settings. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to override the WooCommerce checkout price of any bookable product tied to a booking calendar to an arbitrary value, effectively enabling the purchase of any such product at a self-chosen price. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7639 | 1 Aveva | 6 Aveva Enterprise Scada, Aveva Enterprise Scada Hmi, Aveva Pipeline Integrity Monitor (delivered On Pipeline Simulation Media) and 3 more | 2026-08-17 | 7.1 High |
| The vulnerability, if exploited, could allow an authenticated miscreant with "DNA Authority - Operator" privilege to tamper with serialized data, potentially resulting in code execution during deserialization under the privilege of Enterprise SCADA security group "DNA Apps". | ||||
| CVE-2025-10005 | 2 Buildwps, Wordpress | 2 Ppwp – Password Protect Pages, Wordpress | 2026-08-17 | 4.3 Medium |
| The PPWP – Password Protect WordPress | #1 Most-Reviewed Password Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 1.9.20 via the ppw_free_set_password AJAX action due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to update the password on any password protected post and subsequently access the content. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13784 | 2 Reputeinfosystems, Wordpress | 2 Contact Form, Survey, Quiz & Popup Form Builder – Arforms, Wordpress | 2026-08-17 | 9.8 Critical |
| The Contact Form, Survey, Quiz & Popup Form Builder – ARForms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all versions up to, and including, 1.8.5 via deserialization of untrusted input from form submissions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject a PHP Object. No known POP chain is present in the vulnerable software, which means this vulnerability has no impact unless another plugin or theme containing a POP chain is installed on the site. If a POP chain is present via an additional plugin or theme installed on the target system, it may allow the attacker to perform actions like delete arbitrary files, retrieve sensitive data, or execute code depending on the POP chain present. | ||||
| CVE-2026-68458 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-17 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: binder: cache secctx size before release zeroes it binder_transaction() bounds the scatter-gather buffer area with sg_buf_end_offset and subtracts the aligned LSM context size because the secctx is written at the tail of that area. The subtraction reads lsmctx.len, but that field has already been cleared by the time the line runs: security_secid_to_secctx(secid, &lsmctx) /* lsmctx.len set */ lsmctx_aligned_size = ALIGN(lsmctx.len, sizeof(u64)) extra_buffers_size += lsmctx_aligned_size ... security_release_secctx(&lsmctx) /* memset zeroes len */ ... sg_buf_end_offset = sg_buf_offset + extra_buffers_size - ALIGN(lsmctx.len, sizeof(u64)) /* ALIGN(0,8) */ security_release_secctx() does memset(cp, 0, sizeof(*cp)), so lsmctx.len reads back as 0 and the subtraction contributes nothing, leaving sg_buf_end_offset too large by the aligned secctx size on every transaction to a txn_security_ctx node. Each BINDER_TYPE_PTR object then derives buf_left = sg_buf_end_offset - sg_buf_offset as the sole upper bound on its copy, so the inflated end offset lets the copy run into the bytes that already hold the secctx. The aligned size must therefore be cached before release rather than re-read from the now-cleared field. Fix by caching it in lsmctx_aligned_size at function scope when it is first computed and subtracting lsmctx_aligned_size instead of re-reading lsmctx.len after release. Reuse the same value for the earlier buf_offset computation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72045 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-17 | 8.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: octeontx2-af: cn10k: restrict VF LMTLINE sharing to its own PF rvu_mbox_handler_lmtst_tbl_setup() uses req->base_pcifunc as a direct index into the LMT map table to read another function's LMTLINE physical base address and copy it into the caller's own LMT map table entry. The mailbox dispatcher authenticates req->hdr.pcifunc from the IRQ source, but req->base_pcifunc is a separate payload field and is not sanitized. Reject the request with -EPERM when a VF caller's base_pcifunc is not a valid function under its own PF. is_pf_func_valid() bounds the FUNC field to the PF's configured VF count, keeping the computed index inside the caller's own slot block. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72296 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-17 | 9.1 Critical |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: ife: require ETH_HLEN to be pullable in ife_decode() ife decode may return after making only the outer IFE header and metadata pullable. The caller then passes the decapsulated packet to eth_type_trans(), which expects the inner Ethernet header to be accessible from the linear data area. With a malformed IFE frame, the inner Ethernet header may still be shorter than ETH_HLEN in the linear area, which can lead to a crash in the original code. Fix this by extending the pull check in ife_decode() so that the inner Ethernet header is also guaranteed to be pullable before returning. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72303 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-17 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ASoC: SOF: ipc4-control: Validate notification payload size Validate MODULE_NOTIFICATION payload length before reading bytes/channel data in control update handling. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59903 | 1 Netty | 1 Netty | 2026-08-17 | 6.5 Medium |
| Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to 4.1.137.Final and 4.2.17.Final, io.netty.handler.codec.http.cors.CorsHandler setVaryHeader replaces application Vary headers such as Authorization or Cookie with Origin, allowing a caching proxy or CDN to reuse authenticated responses across users and disclose sensitive information. This issue is fixed in versions 4.1.137.Final and 4.2.17.Final. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59127 | 1 Microsoft | 26 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 23 more | 2026-08-17 | 7.8 High |
| Integer overflow or wraparound in Windows Installer allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61925 | 1 Microsoft | 26 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 23 more | 2026-08-17 | 7.8 High |
| Incorrect authorization in Windows Installer allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61938 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 11 24h2, Windows 11 24h2, Windows 11 25h2 and 5 more | 2026-08-17 | 7 High |
| Use after free in Windows Installer allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||