Export limit exceeded: 375209 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (375209 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-0864 | 1 Python | 1 Cpython | 2026-08-11 | 5.5 Medium |
| When using the "configparser" module to write configuration files containing multi-line text values with carriage return characters (\r) the resulting file could be injected with unexpected keys and values if the attacker controls the written value. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11940 | 1 Python | 1 Cpython | 2026-08-11 | N/A |
| tarfile.extractall() with the 'data' or 'tar' filter could be bypassed by a crafted archive where a hardlink references a symlink stored at a deeper name than the hardlink itself. The extraction fallback validated the symlink at it's archived location but recreated it at the hardlink's shallower path, letting a relative target the filter judged contained escape the destination directory. This allowed a malicious tar archive to create a symlink pointing outside the destination, enabling out-of-destination file reads or writes. This was an incomplete fix of CVE-2025-4330. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12003 | 1 Python | 1 Cpython | 2026-08-11 | N/A |
| To allow builds of Python to be run from an in-tree layout (rather than an installed file layout), the VPATH variable is defined at build time and used to locate certain landmarks - specifically, Modules/setup.local. When this landmark is found relative to VPATH relative to the executable, Python assumes it is running in a source tree and generates a different default sys.path. This code remains in release builds, so that release-ready builds can be built in-tree. On Windows, since builds are written to 'PCbuild/', the value of VPATH is set to '..\..', which results in a landmark of '..\..\Modules\setup.local'. This path is outside the install directory of Python, and may have different permissions, potentially allowing a low-privilege user to create the landmark and an alternative `Lib` folder that will be discovered by an otherwise restricted install. Such a setup occurs with the legacy default install location for all users (in the now superseded EXE installer), due to how Windows allows all users to create folders in the root directory of their OS drive. Our recommended mitigation on Windows is to migrate away from the legacy installer and use the new [Python install manager](https://www.python.org/downloads/latest/pymanager/) to install for the current user. Installs where the directory two levels above the Python installation directory have equivalent permissions are unaffected (in general, a per-user install cannot be modified at all by other users, removing any escalation of privilege risk, and could be directly modified by a privileged user, making the potential tampering irrelevant). Alternative mitigations might include preemptively creating and restricting access to a `Modules` directory. Be aware that only 3.13 and 3.14 will receive updated legacy installers - earlier fixes are only provided as sources. Platforms other than Windows allow VPATH to be overridden, but as they don't usually use a separated directory in the build for binaries, are unlikely to have a landmark reference outside of the install directory. The landmark detection involving VPATH is a fallback for when a more specific landmark - .\pybuilddir.txt - is absent, and was included for compatibility. Future releases of Python will no longer include the fallback, and so builds will need to generate or preserve the pybuilddir.txt file in order to work in-tree. This landmark file has been generated on Windows since 3.11, and on other platforms for longer. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15308 | 1 Python | 1 Cpython | 2026-08-11 | 7.5 High |
| The incremental HTML parser (html.parser.HTMLParser) allows for CPU denial-of-service through repeated unterminated markup declarations when processing uncontrolled data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3276 | 1 Python | 1 Cpython | 2026-08-11 | 5.3 Medium |
| unicodedata.normalize() can take excessive CPU time when processing specially crafted Unicode input containing long runs of combining characters with alternating Canonical Combining Class values. This affects all normalization forms. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6879 | 2 Python, Redhat | 2 Cpython, Hummingbird | 2026-08-11 | 2.2 Low |
| `Element.findall()` and fully-consumed `Element.iterfind()` exhibit `O(n^2)` time complexity when using XPath index predicates (e.g. `[1]`, `[last()]`, `[last()-N]`) on XML documents with many same-tag siblings. `Element.find()` is only affected when the first match is near the end of the sibling list, such as with `[last()]` or `[last()-N]`; `.//item[1]` short-circuits after the first match. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9669 | 1 Python | 1 Cpython | 2026-08-11 | 5.9 Medium |
| bz2.BZ2Decompressor objects could be reused after a decompression error. If an application caught the resulting OSError and retried with the same decompressor, crafted input could cause the decompressor to resume from an invalid internal state and perform out-of-bounds writes to a stack buffer. This could crash the process when processing untrusted data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66779 | 2026-08-11 | 6.3 Medium | ||
| Due to a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP, an authenticated attacker could generate a malicious link and make it publicly accessible. If an authenticated victim accesses this link, the injected input is processed and reflected within the DOM on the client side during page rendering, resulting in the execution of malicious content in the victim's browser context. Successful exploitation could result in a high impact to the confidentiality and a low impact to the integrity of the system, while availability remains unaffected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66778 | 2026-08-11 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| SAP Approuter does not sufficiently sanitize certain request headers before forwarding traffic to internal components. An unauthenticated attacker could send a specially crafted request to obtain limited unauthorized access to information. This results in a low impact on confidentiality. There is no impact on integrity and availability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66777 | 2026-08-11 | 5.9 Medium | ||
| SAP Approuter does not sufficiently validate certain incoming requests before forwarding them to backend destinations. Due to the complexity of the required conditions, an attacker with low privileges could send specially crafted requests to bypass authorization checks and reach protected resources beyond their assigned scope. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to read sensitive data and perform limited modifications on protected resources, resulting in a high impact on confidentiality and a low impact on integrity. There is no impact on availability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66776 | 2026-08-11 | 5.9 Medium | ||
| SAP Approuter does not consistently enforce integrity verification on certain session-related request headers under specific conditions. An attacker with low privileges could send a specially crafted request that bypasses the integrity check and loads another user's session context. Successful exploitation requires the attacker to have previously observed matching session values out-of-band, which makes the attack complex to execute. This could result in a high impact on confidentiality and a low impact on integrity. There is no impact on availability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66775 | 2026-08-11 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| SAP Approuter does not enforce cross-site request forgery protection on the authentication flow by default. An unauthenticated attacker could craft a malicious link and trick a victim into following it. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to bind the victim's session to an attacker-controlled identity, resulting in a low impact on integrity. There is no impact on confidentiality and availability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66774 | 2026-08-11 | 3.7 Low | ||
| SAP Approuter does not consistently handle certain error conditions. An attacker with low privileges could exploit this under a non-default configuration. Successful exploitation is highly complex, as it depends on conditions outside the attacker's control. This could result in a low impact on availability. There is no impact on confidentiality and integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66773 | 2026-08-11 | 5.9 Medium | ||
| A malicious or compromised OData service could disclose sensitive authentication information and inject untrusted data into the application, which may leads to a high impact on confidentiality and low impact on integrity and no impact on Availability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66772 | 2026-08-11 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform (Admin Tools) does not perform sufficient authorization check on certain administrative functionality. An attacker authenticated as a non-administrative user could bypass this restriction to gain limited information about affected functionality. This results in a low impact on confidentiality. There is no impact on integrity and availability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66771 | 2026-08-11 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| SAPUI5 allows a key user with content adaptation privileges to inject malicious script content into persisted application changes. When another user subsequently opens the adapted application, the injected script executes in the victim's browser session. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to access sensitive session data and perform unauthorized actions on behalf of the victim, resulting in a high impact on confidentiality and integrity. There is no impact on availability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66770 | 2026-08-11 | 6.3 Medium | ||
| Due to an SQL Injection vulnerability in SAP Social intelligence, an authenticated attacker could directly inject an SQL DDL (Data Definition Language) string into the underlying database without further authorization. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to make malicious changes to the database structure, resulting in a low impact to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66764 | 2026-08-11 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Reprocess Bank Statement Items in SAP S/4HANA does not perform the necessary authorization checks for authenticated users, allowing them to use rules that have not been shared with them, resulting in privilege escalation.This vulnerability has a low impact on confidentiality, with no impact on integrity and availability of the application | ||||
| CVE-2026-66763 | 2026-08-11 | 7.9 High | ||
| SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform stores certain sensitive credentials associated with user objects using a hard-coded cryptographic key. An attacker with high privileges and local access to the server could retrieve these objects and decrypt the stored credentials. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to obtain sensitive authentication data and modify protected information, resulting in a high impact on confidentiality and integrity. There is no impact on availability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66761 | 2026-08-11 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| SAP Approuter does not enforce sufficient flow control in certain functionality. An attacker with low privileges could send high volumes of data without consuming responses, causing unbounded memory growth. This results in a low impact on availability. There is no impact on confidentiality and integrity. | ||||