Export limit exceeded: 45788 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (45788 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-22243 | 2 Broadcom, Vmware | 4 Vmware Nsx, Cloud Foundation, Telco Cloud Infrastructure and 1 more | 2025-07-14 | 7.5 High |
| VMware NSX Manager UI is vulnerable to a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attack due to improper input validation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-22244 | 2 Broadcom, Vmware | 4 Vmware Nsx, Cloud Foundation, Telco Cloud Infrastructure and 1 more | 2025-07-14 | 6.9 Medium |
| VMware NSX contains a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the gateway firewall due to improper input validation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-22245 | 2 Broadcom, Vmware | 4 Vmware Nsx, Cloud Foundation, Telco Cloud Infrastructure and 1 more | 2025-07-14 | 5.9 Medium |
| VMware NSX contains a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the router port due to improper input validation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25247 | 1 Apache | 1 Felix Webconsole | 2025-07-14 | 6.1 Medium |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Apache Felix Webconsole. This issue affects Apache Felix Webconsole 4.x up to 4.9.8 and 5.x up to 5.0.8. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.9.10 or 5.0.10 or higher, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27888 | 1 Apache | 1 Druid | 2025-07-14 | 5.4 Medium |
| Severity: medium (5.8) / important Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting'), URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') vulnerability in Apache Druid. This issue affects all previous Druid versions. When using the Druid management proxy, a request that has a specially crafted URL could be used to redirect the request to an arbitrary server instead. This has the potential for XSS or XSRF. The user is required to be authenticated for this exploit. The management proxy is enabled in Druid's out-of-box configuration. It may be disabled to mitigate this vulnerability. If the management proxy is disabled, some web console features will not work properly, but core functionality is unaffected. Users are recommended to upgrade to Druid 31.0.2 or Druid 32.0.1, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56916 | 1 Netbox | 1 Netbox | 2025-07-13 | 6.1 Medium |
| In Netbox Community 4.1.7, once authenticated, Configuration History > Add`is vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) due to the `current value` field rendering user supplied html. An authenticated attacker can leverage this to add malicious JavaScript to the any banner field. Once a victim edits a Configuration History version or attempts to Add a new version, the XSS payload will trigger. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56917 | 1 Netbox | 1 Netbox | 2025-07-13 | 7.1 High |
| Netbox Community 4.1.7 is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) via the maintenance banner` in maintenance mode. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25905 | 2 4pace, Cadclick | 2 Cadclick, Cadclick | 2025-07-13 | 7.1 High |
| Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in CADClick v1.13.0 and before allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the "tree" parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56918 | 1 Netbox | 1 Netbox | 2025-07-13 | 6.1 Medium |
| In Netbox Community 4.1.7, the login page is vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS), which allows a privileged, authenticated attacker to exfiltrate user input from the login form. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5194 | 2 Wordpress, Wp Map Block Project | 2 Wordpress, Wp Map Block | 2025-07-13 | 4.8 Medium |
| The WP Map Block WordPress plugin before 2.0.3 does not validate and escape some of its block options before outputting them back in a page/post where the block is embed, which could allow users with the contributor role and above to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3467 | 1 Langgenius | 1 Dify | 2025-07-13 | 5.4 Medium |
| An XSS vulnerability exists in langgenius/dify versions prior to 1.1.3, specifically affecting Firefox browsers. This vulnerability allows an attacker to obtain the administrator's token by sending a payload in the published chat. When the administrator views the conversation content through the monitoring/log function using Firefox, the XSS vulnerability is triggered, potentially exposing sensitive token information to the attacker. | ||||
| CVE-2025-49542 | 1 Adobe | 1 Coldfusion | 2025-07-13 | 5.2 Medium |
| ColdFusion versions 2025.2, 2023.14, 2021.20 and earlier are affected by a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. If an unauthenticated attacker is able to convince a victim to visit a URL referencing a vulnerable page, malicious JavaScript content may be executed within the context of the victim's browser, scope is changed. The vulnerable component is restricted to internal IP addresses. | ||||
| CVE-2025-49541 | 1 Adobe | 1 Coldfusion | 2025-07-13 | 4.3 Medium |
| ColdFusion versions 2025.2, 2023.14, 2021.20 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a high-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field, scope is changed. The vulnerable component is restricted to internal IP addresses. | ||||
| CVE-2025-49543 | 1 Adobe | 1 Coldfusion | 2025-07-13 | 4.3 Medium |
| ColdFusion versions 2025.2, 2023.14, 2021.20 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a high-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field, scope is changed. The vulnerable component is restricted to internal IP addresses. | ||||
| CVE-2025-49540 | 1 Adobe | 1 Coldfusion | 2025-07-13 | 4.3 Medium |
| ColdFusion versions 2025.2, 2023.14, 2021.20 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a high-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field, scope is changed. The vulnerable component is restricted to internal IP addresses. | ||||
| CVE-2024-43291 | 1 Voidcoders | 1 Void Contact Form 7 Widget For Elementor Page Builder | 2025-07-13 | 5.9 Medium |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in voidCoders Void Contact Form 7 Widget For Elementor Page Builder allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Void Contact Form 7 Widget For Elementor Page Builder: from n/a through 2.4.1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-2245 | 1 Mozilocms | 1 Mozilocms | 2025-07-13 | 5.4 Medium |
| Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in moziloCMS version 2.0. By sending a POST request to the '/install.php' endpoint, a JavaScript payload could be executed in the 'username' parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10716 | 1 Pegasystems | 1 Pega Platform | 2025-07-13 | 5.9 Medium |
| Pega Platform versions 8.1 to Infinity 24.2.0 are affected by an XSS issue with search. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0342 | 1 Campcodes | 1 Computer Laboratory Management System | 2025-07-13 | 3.5 Low |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in CampCodes Computer Laboratory Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /class/edit/edit. The manipulation of the argument s_lname leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Other parameters might be affected as well. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1879 | 1 I-drive | 2 I11, I12 | 2025-07-13 | 2.4 Low |
| A vulnerability was found in i-Drive i11 and i12 up to 20250227 and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component APK. The manipulation leads to hard-coded credentials. It is possible to launch the attack on the physical device. It was not possible to identify the current maintainer of the product. It must be assumed that the product is end-of-life. | ||||