Export limit exceeded: 14504 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (14504 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-39840 | 1 Factorio | 1 Factorio | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| Factorio before 1.1.101 allows a crafted server to execute arbitrary code on clients via a custom map that leverages the ability of certain Lua base module functions to execute bytecode and generate fake objects. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34105 | 1 Flexense | 1 Diskboss | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the built-in web interface of DiskBoss Enterprise versions 7.4.28, 7.5.12, and 8.2.14. The vulnerability arises from improper bounds checking on the path component of HTTP GET requests. By sending a specially crafted long URI, a remote unauthenticated attacker can trigger a buffer overflow, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution with SYSTEM privileges on vulnerable Windows hosts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0235 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| Out-of-bounds vulnerability due to improper memory release during image rendering in Generic PCL6 V4 Printer Driver / Generic UFR II V4 Printer Driver / Generic LIPSLX V4 Printer Driver. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1268 | 2026-04-15 | 9.4 Critical | ||
| Out-of-bounds vulnerability in EMF Recode processing of Generic Plus PCL6 Printer Driver / Generic Plus UFR II Printer Driver / Generic Plus LIPS4 Printer Driver / Generic Plus LIPSLX Printer Driver / Generic Plus PS Printer Driver / Generic FAX Printer Driver / UFRII LT Printer Driver / CARPS2 Printer Driver / PDF Driver / LIPS4 Printer Driver / LIPSLX Printer Driver / UFR II Printer Driver / PS Printer Driver / PCL6 Printer Driver | ||||
| CVE-2025-42971 | 2026-04-15 | 4 Medium | ||
| A memory corruption vulnerability exists in SAPCAR allowing an attacker to craft malicious SAPCAR archives. When a high privileged victim extracts this malicious archive, it gets processed by SAPCAR on their system, resulting in out-of-bounds memory read and write. This could lead to file extraction and file overwrite outside the intended directories. This vulnerability has low impact on the confidentiality, integrity and availability of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2018-25154 | 1 Gnu | 1 Barcode | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| GNU Barcode 0.99 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in its code 93 encoding process that allows attackers to trigger memory corruption. Attackers can exploit boundary errors during input file processing to potentially execute arbitrary code on the affected system. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11345 | 2026-04-15 | 7.3 High | ||
| A heap-based memory vulnerability has been identified in the Postscript interpreter in various Lexmark devices. The vulnerability can be leveraged by an attacker to execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9340 | 1 Bouncycastle | 1 Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-fips-java-api | 2026-04-15 | 5.9 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. Bouncy Castle for Java bc-fips on All (API modules). This vulnerability is associated with program files org/bouncycastle/jcajce/provider/BaseCipher. This issue affects Bouncy Castle for Java: from BC-FJA 2.1.0 through 2.1.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0236 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| Out-of-bounds vulnerability in slope processing during curve rendering in Generic PCL6 V4 Printer Driver / Generic UFR II V4 Printer Driver / Generic LIPSLX V4 Printer Driver. | ||||
| CVE-2024-0150 | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High | ||
| NVIDIA GPU display driver for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability where data is written past the end or before the beginning of a buffer. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to information disclosure, denial of service, or data tampering. | ||||
| CVE-2024-20496 | 1 Cisco | 2 Sd-wan Vedge Cloud, Sd-wan Vedge Router | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the UDP packet validation code of Cisco SD-WAN vEdge Software could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to incorrect handling of a specific type of malformed UDP packet. An attacker in a machine-in-the-middle position could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted UDP packets to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to reboot, resulting in a DoS condition on the affected system. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9178 | 1 Rockwellautomation | 1 1715-aentr Eternet/ip Adapter | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A denial-of-service security issue exists in the affected product and version. The security issue is caused through CIP communication using crafted payloads. The security issue could result in no CIP communication with 1715 EtherNet/IP Adapter.A restart is required to recover. | ||||
| CVE-2010-20115 | 2 Arcane Software, Microsoft | 2 Vermillion Ftp Daemon, Windows | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Arcane Software’s Vermillion FTP Daemon (vftpd) versions up to and including 1.31 contains a memory corruption vulnerability triggered by a malformed FTP PORT command. The flaw arises from an out-of-bounds array access during input parsing, allowing an attacker to manipulate stack memory and potentially execute arbitrary code. Exploitation requires direct access to the FTP service and is constrained by a single execution attempt if the daemon is installed as a Windows service. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4422 | 1 Insyde | 1 Insydeh2o | 2026-04-15 | 8.2 High |
| The vulnerability was identified in the code developed specifically for Lenovo. Please visit "Lenovo Product Security Advisories and Announcements" webpage for more information about the vulnerability. https://support.lenovo.com/us/en/product_security/home | ||||
| CVE-2025-25050 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| An out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in the cv_upgrade_sensor_firmware functionality of Dell ControlVault3 prior to 5.15.10.14 and Dell ControlVault 3 Plus prior to 6.2.26.36. A specially crafted ControlVault API call can lead to an out-of-bounds write. An attacker can issue an API call to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41413 | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High | ||
| Fuji Electric Smart Editor is vulnerable to an out-of-bounds write, which may allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24528 | 2 Mit, Redhat | 5 Kerberos 5, Discovery, Enterprise Linux and 2 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| In MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) before 1.22 (with incremental propagation), there is an integer overflow for a large update size to resize() in kdb_log.c. An authenticated attacker can cause an out-of-bounds write and kadmind daemon crash. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10573 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2026-04-15 | 6.7 Medium |
| An out-of-bounds write flaw was found in mpg123 when handling crafted streams. When decoding PCM, the libmpg123 may write past the end of a heap-located buffer. Consequently, heap corruption may happen, and arbitrary code execution is not discarded. The complexity required to exploit this flaw is considered high as the payload must be validated by the MPEG decoder and the PCM synth before execution. Additionally, to successfully execute the attack, the user must scan through the stream, making web live stream content (such as web radios) a very unlikely attack vector. | ||||
| CVE-2023-5406 | 2026-04-15 | 5.9 Medium | ||
| Server communication with a controller can lead to remote code execution using a specially crafted message from the controller. See Honeywell Security Notification for recommendations on upgrading and versioning. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32008 | 1 Intel | 1 Intel Amt And Intel Standard Manageability | 2026-04-15 | 8.6 High |
| Out-of-bounds write in the firmware for the Intel(R) AMT and Intel(R) Standard Manageability within Ring 3: User Applications may allow a denial of service. Network adversary with an unauthenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable denial of service. This result may potentially occur via network access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (low) impacts. | ||||