Export limit exceeded: 378610 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (378610 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-13196 | 1 Kunbus | 1 Picontrol | 2026-08-17 | N/A |
| Nozomi Networks Labs identified a CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in the process-image management functionality of KUNBUS piControl in version 2.6.2 that allows a local authenticated attacker with device configuration access to write attacker-controlled data outside the bounds of the process-image buffer and corrupt adjacent kernel memory, resulting in kernel memory corruption and denial of service, by supplying crafted device configuration data and crafted input through the piControl character device. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13197 | 1 Kunbus | 1 Picontrol | 2026-08-17 | N/A |
| Nozomi Networks Labs identified a CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') vulnerability in the configuration and process-image management functionality of KUNBUS piControl in version 2.6.2 that allows a local authenticated attacker to trigger use-after-free and invalid pointer dereferences on kernel configuration objects, resulting in kernel memory corruption and denial of service, by issuing concurrent crafted requests through the piControl character device. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13002 | 1 Redhat | 3 Enterprise Linux, Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2026-08-17 | 4.4 Medium |
| A flow has been identified into dnssec.c library, causing an infinite loop to dnsmasq service. An attacker who controls any DNSSEC-signed zone can hang the dnsmasq process with a single crafted response, killing all DNS resolution for its clients. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13198 | 1 Kunbus | 1 Picontrol | 2026-08-17 | N/A |
| Nozomi Networks Labs identified a CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') vulnerability in the event notification functionality of KUNBUS piControl in version 2.6.2 that allows a local authenticated attacker to corrupt kernel heap and event-list state and disclose a small amount of adjacent kernel memory, resulting in kernel memory corruption and denial of service, by issuing concurrent crafted requests from multiple threads through the piControl character device. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57469 | 1 Kunbus | 1 Pictory | 2026-08-17 | N/A |
| Nozomi Networks Labs identified a CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web-based configuration backend of KUNBUS PiCtory in version 2.16.0 that allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to perform state-changing operations in the context of an authenticated operator, including deletion of project and configuration files and reset of the control runtime, by inducing the victim's browser to submit crafted requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57471 | 1 Kunbus | 1 Revpipyload | 2026-08-17 | N/A |
| Nozomi Networks Labs identified a CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in the file management functionality of the XML-RPC management interface of KUNBUS RevPiPyLoad in version 0.11.0 that allows a local unauthenticated attacker to read arbitrary files with the privileges of the RevPiPyLoad daemon, including sensitive configuration and credential material, by sending crafted requests to the local management service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57472 | 1 Kunbus | 1 Revpipyload | 2026-08-17 | N/A |
| Nozomi Networks Labs identified a CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in the file management functionality of the XML-RPC management interface of KUNBUS RevPiPyLoad in version 0.11.0 that allows a local unauthenticated attacker to delete arbitrary files with the privileges of the RevPiPyLoad daemon, resulting in loss of configuration integrity and denial of service, by sending crafted requests to the local management service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-63702 | 1 Dell | 1 Wyse Management Suite | 2026-08-17 | 6.3 Medium |
| Dell Wyse Management Suite (WMS), versions prior to 2605.0.2, contain a Use of Hard-coded Credentials vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Unauthorized access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-63701 | 1 Dell | 1 Wyse Management Suite | 2026-08-17 | 6.3 Medium |
| Dell Wyse Management Suite (WMS), versions prior to 2605.0.2, contain an Improper Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Privilege Escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-53970 | 1 Lucasgelfond | 1 Zerobrew | 2026-08-17 | 7.5 High |
| ZeroBrew version 0.3.1 and prior contains a missing integrity verification vulnerability in the Ruby compatibility shim that allows network attackers to execute arbitrary code by substituting malicious content at formula resource or URL-based patch URLs without checksum validation. Attackers can intercept or replace downloads for secondary resource and patch paths in shim.rb, injecting attacker-controlled build steps or source tree modifications that execute during source builds via 'zb install --build-from-source' without any integrity warning. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66272 | 1 Dell | 1 Wyse Management Suite | 2026-08-17 | 5.3 Medium |
| Dell Wyse Management Suite (WMS), versions prior to 2605.0.2, contain a Missing Authentication for Critical Function vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66270 | 1 Dell | 1 Wyse Management Suite | 2026-08-17 | 7.2 High |
| Dell Wyse Management Suite (WMS), versions prior to 2605.0.2, contain an Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Remote Code Execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66271 | 1 Dell | 1 Wyse Management Suite | 2026-08-17 | 7.2 High |
| Dell Wyse Management Suite (WMS), versions prior to 2605.0.2, contain an Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Remote Code Execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-63700 | 1 Dell | 1 Wyse Management Suite | 2026-08-17 | 7.8 High |
| Dell Wyse Management Suite (WMS), versions prior to 2605.0.2, contain an Incorrect Default Permission vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Privilege Escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-49986 | 1 Cdeust | 1 Cortex | 2026-08-17 | N/A |
| The Cortex MCP server (`neuro-cortex-memory`), a cross-platform persistent memory MCP, prior to version 3.17.1 treats the `CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR` environment variable — automatically set by Claude Code to the currently open project directory — as a trusted Cortex developer checkout. When the `open_visualization` tool is invoked, `_find_dev_source()` resolves the user's active project directory as a candidate Cortex source root. The only validation performed by `_is_cortex_root()` is a check for the presence of an `mcp_server/` subdirectory and a `ui/unified-viz.html` file. An attacker who places these two marker files in a malicious repository can cause Cortex to execute an arbitrary `mcp_server/server/visualize_bootstrap.py` from that directory via `subprocess.run([sys.executable, ...])`, achieving code execution with the privileges of the victim's local user process. Version 3.17.1 fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-49826 | 1 Concourse | 1 Concourse | 2026-08-17 | N/A |
| Concourse is a container-based automation system written in Go. Prior to version 8.2.3, an attacker is able to craft and send a user a URL that will redirect the user from the Concourse web server to any other site. This could be used in a phishing attack to steal user's credentials. This has been fixed in 8.2.3. No known workarounds are available. | ||||
| CVE-2026-49989 | 1 Cratedb | 1 Cratedb | 2026-08-17 | N/A |
| CrateDB is a distributed SQL database. Prior to versions 6.2.8 and 6.3.2, any authenticated user can read or delete any blob whose SHA-1 digest they know, and can plant new blobs unconditionally, in any blob table, regardless of `GRANT`s. CrateDB has two ways to access blob storage: SQL (`SELECT ... FROM blob.<table>` and friends) and the blob HTTP API (`GET|PUT|DELETE /_blobs/{table}/{digest}`). The SQL path goes through `AccessControl`, which is what enforces privilege grants; that's why `SELECT digest FROM blob.secret_blobs` fails for a user who has no grants on the table. The HTTP path authenticates the request but never asks `AccessControl` whether the authenticated user is allowed to touch the table. So a user with no grants gets `MissingPrivilegeException` from SQL and `200 OK` plus the blob bytes from `GET /_blobs/secret_blobs/<digest>`. Deployments that don't use `BLOB TABLE` are unaffected. Authentication itself still works; the bug is strictly that being authenticated as anyone is treated as sufficient for any blob op. Versions 6.2.8 and 6.3.2 fix the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-47191 | 1 Siemens | 1 Kas | 2026-08-17 | N/A |
| kas is a setup tool for bitbake based projects. Prior to version 5.3, when relying solely on a git commit ID (SHA-1 or SHA-256) to qualify if a checkout of a repository is equivalent to the state validated while adding its commit ID to a kas configuration, users may be tricked to check out a branch of the same name from this repository. This implies that the referenced repository has been taken over by an attacker and modified to carry such a branch. SHA-1 commits may also be replaced by creating hash collisions, so the primary impact of this issue is on SHA-256 commit IDs. Version 5.3 fixes the issue. As a workaround, avoid relying solely on the commit ID for integrity validation of a repository that might become under control of a malicious 3rd party. If available, additional validate cryptographically signed commits or tags. Alternatively, mirror the repository to a save place, validate its integrity, and use this instead of the original one. | ||||
| CVE-2026-46603 | 1 Golang | 1 Image | 2026-08-17 | 7.5 High |
| VP8L decoding in golang.org/x/image/vp8l can allocate an excessive amount of memory when processing a crafted VP8L image containing many unused Huffman tree groups. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via memory exhaustion. | ||||
| CVE-2026-47192 | 1 Siemens | 1 Kas | 2026-08-17 | N/A |
| kas is a setup tool for bitbake based projects. Starting in version 4.8 and prior to version 5.3, kas checks out and processes repositories regarding configuration includes prior to validating signatures of those repositories. This may allow to replace on original repository with one under the control of an attacker under very specific conditions. First of all, the attacker must have gained control of a repository that a kas file of the victim is referencing. Furthermore, the following conditions must be fulfilled: the victim's kas configuration must include a configuration file from the attacked repository; the repository state is referenced by tag, and no commit ID is specified (this is triggering a warning, though); the key used for validating the tag or commit signature is stored as file in a repository; no fingerprint for the key is specified; and the `_source_dir` key must not be set by the victim when calling kas (e.g. by avoiding a local `.config.yaml`). Given these conditions, the attacker could modify the included kas configuration in way that the key used to validate the tag signature of the attacker's repository could be replaced by an attacker-chosen key. No other exploit possibilities have been identified so far, but this does not rule out that those may exist. All patches have been released along with kas version 5.3. As a workaround, pin the expected signature key via its fingerprint, also when storing it as file in a repository. | ||||