Export limit exceeded: 341054 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (341054 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-30407 | 2026-03-27 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2272 | 2 Gimp, Redhat | 2 Gimp, Enterprise Linux | 2026-03-27 | 4.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in GIMP. An integer overflow vulnerability exists when processing ICO image files, specifically in the `ico_read_info` and `ico_read_icon` functions. This issue arises because a size calculation for image buffers can wrap around due to a 32-bit integer evaluation, allowing oversized image headers to bypass security checks. A remote attacker could exploit this by providing a specially crafted ICO file, leading to a buffer overflow and memory corruption, which may result in an application level denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28786 | 1 Open-webui | 1 Open-webui | 2026-03-27 | 4.3 Medium |
| Open WebUI is a self-hosted artificial intelligence platform designed to operate entirely offline. Prior to version 0.8.6, an unsanitized filename field in the speech-to-text transcription endpoint allows any authenticated non-admin user to trigger a `FileNotFoundError` whose message — including the server's absolute `DATA_DIR` path — is returned verbatim in the HTTP 400 response body, confirming information disclosure on all default deployments. Version 0.8.6 patches the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0748 | 1 Drupal | 1 Internationalization | 2026-03-27 | N/A |
| In the Drupal 7 Internationalization (i18n) module, the i18n_node submodule allows a user with both "Translate content" and "Administer content translations" permissions to view and attach unpublished nodes via the translation UI and its autocomplete widget. This bypasses intended access controls and discloses unpublished node titles and IDs. Exploit affects versions 7.x-1.0 up to and including 7.x-1.35. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20112 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios Xe Software | 2026-03-27 | 4.8 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the web-based Cisco IOx application hosting environment management interface of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the web-based management interface of an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious code into specific pages of the interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the affected interface or access sensitive, browser-based information. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20113 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios Xe Software | 2026-03-27 | 5.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the web-based Cisco IOx application hosting environment management interface of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to perform a carriage return line feed (CRLF) injection attack against a user. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted packets to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to arbitrarily inject log entries, manipulate the structure of log files, or obscure legitimate log events. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20083 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios Xe Software | 2026-03-27 | 6.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the Secure Copy Protocol (SCP) server feature of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker with low privileges to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper handling of a malformed SCP request. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by issuing a crafted command through SSH. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a DoS condition. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20110 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios Xe Software | 2026-03-27 | 6.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. This vulnerability exists because incorrect privileges are associated with the start maintenance command. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by accessing the management CLI of the affected device as a low-privileged user and using the start maintenance command. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to put the device in maintenance mode, which shuts down interfaces, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. In case of exploitation, a device administrator can connect to the CLI and use the stop maintenance command to restore operations. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20108 | 1 Cisco | 1 Catalyst Sd-wan Manager | 2026-03-27 | 5.4 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the interface of an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the web-based management interface to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the affected interface or access sensitive, browser-based information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-26233 | 1 Mattermost | 2 Mattermost, Mattermost Server | 2026-03-27 | 4.3 Medium |
| Mattermost versions 11.4.x <= 11.4.0, 11.3.x <= 11.3.1, 11.2.x <= 11.2.3, 10.11.x <= 10.11.11 fail to rate limit login requests which allows unauthenticated remote attackers to cause denial of service (server crash and restart) via HTTP/2 single packet attack with 100+ parallel login requests.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2025-00566 | ||||
| CVE-2026-1724 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-03-27 | 6.8 Medium |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 18.5 before 18.8.7, 18.9 before 18.9.3, and 18.10 before 18.10.1 that could have allowed an unauthenticated user to access API tokens of self-hosted AI models due to improper access control. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14595 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-03-27 | 4.3 Medium |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 18.6 before 18.8.7, 18.9 before 18.9.3, and 18.10 before 18.10.1 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user with Planner role to view security category metadata and attributes in group security configuration due to improper access control | ||||
| CVE-2026-2414 | 1 Hypr | 1 Server | 2026-03-27 | N/A |
| Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in HYPR Server allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Server: from 9.5.2 before 10.7.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33665 | 1 N8n | 1 N8n | 2026-03-27 | N/A |
| n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to versions 2.4.0 and 1.121.0, when LDAP authentication is enabled, n8n automatically linked an LDAP identity to an existing local account if the LDAP email attribute matched the local account's email. An authenticated LDAP user who could control their own LDAP email attribute could set it to match another user's email — including an administrator's — and upon login gain full access to that account. The account linkage persisted even if the LDAP email was later reverted, resulting in a permanent account takeover. LDAP authentication must be configured and active (non-default). The issue has been fixed in n8n versions 2.4.0 and 1.121.0. Users should upgrade to one of these versions or later to remediate the vulnerability. If upgrading is not immediately possible, administrators should consider the following temporary mitigations: Disable LDAP authentication until the instance can be upgraded, restrict LDAP directory permissions so that users cannot modify their own email attributes, and/or audit existing LDAP-linked accounts for unexpected account associations. These workarounds do not fully remediate the risk and should only be used as short-term mitigation measures. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27813 | 1 Everest | 1 Everest-core | 2026-03-27 | 5.3 Medium |
| EVerest is an EV charging software stack. Versions prior to 2026.02.0 have a data race leading to use-after-free. This is triggered by EV plug-in/unplug and RFID/RemoteStart/OCPP authorization events (or delayed authorization response). Version 2026.2.0 contains a patch. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27828 | 1 Everest | 1 Everest-core | 2026-03-27 | N/A |
| EVerest is an EV charging software stack. Prior to version 2026.02.0, ISO15118_chargerImpl::handle_session_setup uses v2g_ctx after it has been freed when ISO15118 initialization fails (e.g., no IPv6 link-local address). The EVSE process can be crashed remotely by an attacker with MQTT access who issues a session_setup command while v2g_ctx has been released. Version 2026.02.0 contains a patch. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33481 | 1 Anchore | 1 Syft | 2026-03-27 | 5.3 Medium |
| Syft is a a CLI tool and Go library for generating a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) from container images and filesystems. Syft versions before v1.42.3 would not properly cleanup temporary storage if the temporary storage was exhausted during a scan. When scanning archives Syft will unpack those archives into temporary storage then inspect the unpacked contents. Under normal operation Syft will remove the temporary data it writes after completing a scan. This vulnerability would affect users of Syft that were scanning content that could cause Syft to fill the temporary storage that would then cause Syft to raise an error and exit. When the error is triggered Syft would exit without properly removing the temporary files in use. In our testing this was most easily reproduced by scanning very large artifacts or highly compressed artifacts such as a zipbomb. Because Syft would not clean up its temporary files, the result would be filling temporary file storage preventing future runs of Syft or other system utilities that rely on temporary storage being available. The patch has been released in v1.42.3. Syft now cleans up temporary files when an error condition is encountered. There are no workarounds for this vulnerability in Syft. Users that find their temporary storage depleted can manually remove the temporary files. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33732 | 1 H3js | 1 Srvx | 2026-03-27 | 4.8 Medium |
| srvx is a universal server based on web standards. Prior to version 0.11.13, a pathname parsing discrepancy in srvx's `FastURL` allows middleware bypass on the Node.js adapter when a raw HTTP request uses an absolute URI with a non-standard scheme (e.g. `file://`). Starting in version 0.11.13, the `FastURL` constructor now deopts to native `URL` for any string not starting with `/`, ensuring consistent pathname resolution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-21725 | 1 Grafana | 1 Grafana | 2026-03-27 | 2.6 Low |
| A time-of-create-to-time-of-use (TOCTOU) vulnerability lets recently deleted-then-recreated data sources be re-deleted without permission to do so. This requires several very stringent conditions to be met: - The attacker must have admin access to the specific datasource prior to its first deletion. - Upon deletion, all steps within the attack must happen within the next 30 seconds and on the same pod of Grafana. - The attacker must delete the datasource, then someone must recreate it. - The new datasource must not have the attacker as an admin. - The new datasource must have the same UID as the prior datasource. These are randomised by default. - The datasource can now be re-deleted by the attacker. - Once 30 seconds are up, the attack is spent and cannot be repeated. - No datasource with any other UID can be attacked. | ||||
| CVE-2026-21721 | 1 Grafana | 2 Grafana, Grafana Enterprise | 2026-03-27 | 8.1 High |
| The dashboard permissions API does not verify the target dashboard scope and only checks the dashboards.permissions:* action. As a result, a user who has permission management rights on one dashboard can read and modify permissions on other dashboards. This is an organization‑internal privilege escalation. | ||||