Export limit exceeded: 19983 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 376619 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (376619 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-10545 | 1 Ibm | 1 Planning Analytics Local | 2026-08-12 | 7.5 High |
| IBM Planning Analytics Local 2.1.0 through 2.1.21 is vulnerable to an open redirect that allows an attacker to redirect users to arbitrary external websites via a crafted URL. If used in SSO authentication flows, this could result in exposure of session tokens and allow attackers to hijack user sessions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13361 | 1 Ibm | 1 Informix Dynamic Server | 2026-08-12 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Informix oninit sq_sgkprepare RCE via unchecked SQL Interface length field. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12005 | 1 Ibm | 4 Security Verify Access, Security Verify Access Container, Verify Identity Access and 1 more | 2026-08-12 | 7.2 High |
| IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.3 contains a input validation vulnerability in the management interface that allows already privileged attackers to execute additional operations by crafting a malicious HTTP request. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13394 | 1 Wso2 | 56 Api Control Plane, Api Manager, Enterprise Integrator and 53 more | 2026-08-12 | 5.4 Medium |
| The Ajax processor within the Carbon console fails to adequately protect state-changing operations from Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks. Specifically, it utilizes the HTTP GET method for these operations, and while the SameSite=Lax cookie attribute is employed for mitigation, this mechanism is bypassed as it permits cookies to be sent with cross-origin top-level navigation requests, including GET requests. This allows an attacker to trick an authenticated user's browser into unknowingly executing unintended actions. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to perform unauthorized state-altering requests on behalf of authenticated users. This could lead to consequences such as data modification, account changes, or other actions that could result in data compromise or loss of user control over their account. However, this attack is only feasible if the Carbon console and related services are exposed to the public internet, which is not recommended according to WSO2's security guidelines. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19643 | 1 Aws | 1 Aws-sdk-cpp | 2026-08-12 | 5.3 Medium |
| An out-of-bounds read issue in the Base64 decoder in Amazon aws-sdk-cpp before 1.11.862, on some platforms, might allow a remote authenticated user to crash an application that processes crafted Base64-encoded input. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 1.11.862. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66380 | 1 Jfrog | 1 Artifactory | 2026-08-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| An authenticated user without repository read permission may access private OCI referrer metadata under specific conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-68755 | 1 Jfrog | 1 Artifactory | 2026-08-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| A bundle writer may create misleading release promotion information under specific conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66382 | 1 Jfrog | 1 Artifactory | 2026-08-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| An authenticated user may write files outside the intended Artifactory work directory under specific conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70547 | 1 Jfrog | 1 Artifactory | 2026-08-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| An authenticated user without repository read permission may access package metadata under specific conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65938 | 1 Progress Software | 1 Whatsup Gold | 2026-08-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| In WhatsUp Gold versions released before 2026.0.2, an improper authorization vulnerability in the Scheduled Reports API allows any authenticated user to invoke restricted actions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-49467 | 1 Smp46 | 1 Pingvin-share-x | 2026-08-12 | 8.8 High |
| Pingvin Share X is a secure and easy self-hosted file sharing platform. A vulnerability in versions 1.5.0 through 1.18.0 allow an attacker to bypass password verification when managing Time-based One-Time Password (TOTP) settings. The root cause is a missing `await` keyword on calls to the asynchronous `verifyPassword` method in `authTotp.service.ts` and the `authenticateUser` method in `auth.service.ts`. In JavaScript, an unawaited `Promise` is always truthy. So the logic intended to throw a `ForbiddenException` when a password is incorrect. It never executes because the expression evaluates the existence of the `Promise` object rather than its resolved boolean result. The vulnerability is fixed in version 1.18.1 by ensuring all asynchronous authentication calls are properly awaited. There are no official workarounds. If a user is locked out, an administrator must manually reset the user's TOTP status in the database. | ||||
| CVE-2026-44741 | 1 Pimcore | 1 Pimcore | 2026-08-12 | 8.8 High |
| Pimcore's Admin Classic Bundle provides a Backend UI for Pimcore. Versions prior to 2.3.6 and 1.7.18 have a SQL injection vulnerability in Pimcore's translation grid date filter — the user-supplied `property` field from the filter JSON is interpolated directly into a `UNIX_TIMESTAMP(DATE(FROM_UNIXTIME(...)))` SQL expression without parameterization or allowlist validation. Versiosn 2.3.6 and 1.7.18 fix the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19642 | 1 Aws | 1 Aws-sdk-cpp | 2026-08-12 | 5.9 Medium |
| An out-of-bounds write issue in the Base64 decoder in Amazon aws-sdk-cpp before 1.11.862 might allow a remote authenticated user to cause a crash or heap memory corruption in an application that processes crafted Base64-encoded input. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 1.11.862. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17642 | 1 Ibm | 1 I | 2026-08-12 | 8.8 High |
| IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18150 | 1 Ibm | 1 I | 2026-08-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to a race condition. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72508 | 1 Redhat | 1 Acm | 2026-08-12 | 9.9 Critical |
| A flaw was found in the multicloud-operators-subscription component of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management (RHACM). This vulnerability allows a namespace-admin tenant to perform a confused-deputy attack by creating Subscription Custom Resources (CRs) that leverage a highly privileged ServiceAccount (SA). This enables the tenant to deploy arbitrary cluster-scoped resources, leading to privilege escalation and potential arbitrary code execution across the cluster. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18148 | 1 Ibm | 1 I | 2026-08-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to inject arbitrary content into Navigator log files due to improper output neutralization for logs. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17082 | 1 Ibm | 1 I | 2026-08-12 | 8.8 High |
| IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to gain elevated privileges due to improper validation of a client-supplied profile name. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13736 | 1 Wso2 | 10 Api Manager, Identity Server, Identity Server As Key Manager and 7 more | 2026-08-12 | 3.7 Low |
| When Multi-Attribute Login is enabled, the login interface fails to consistently mask the existence of user accounts. For valid users, the server resolves and displays their canonical username, while for non-existent users, it echoes the original input. This occurs regardless of the validate_username configuration. The discovery of valid usernames can increase the risk of brute force attacks, social engineering attacks, and targeted information leakage. Attackers can leverage this information to craft more effective phishing campaigns or social engineering tactics to compromise user accounts or extract sensitive data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17083 | 1 Ibm | 1 I | 2026-08-12 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow. | ||||