Export limit exceeded: 10011 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10011 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-41167 | 1 Sap | 1 3d Visual Enterprise Author | 2026-02-25 | 7.8 High |
| Due to lack of proper memory management, when a victim opens a manipulated AutoCAD (.dwg, TeighaTranslator.exe) file received from untrusted sources in SAP 3D Visual Enterprise Author - version 9, it is possible that a Remote Code Execution can be triggered when payload forces a stack-based overflow or a re-use of dangling pointer which refers to overwritten space in memory. | ||||
| CVE-2022-3214 | 1 Deltaww | 1 Diaenergie | 2026-02-25 | 9.8 Critical |
| Delta Industrial Automation's DIAEnergy, an industrial energy management system, is vulnerable to CWE-798, Use of Hard-coded Credentials. Versions prior to 1.9.03.009 have this vulnerability. Executable files could be uploaded to certain directories using hard-coded bearer authorization, allowing remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2022-39808 | 1 Sap | 1 3d Visual Enterprise Author | 2026-02-25 | 7.8 High |
| Due to lack of proper memory management, when a victim opens a manipulated Wavefront Object (.obj, ObjTranslator.exe) file received from untrusted sources in SAP 3D Visual Enterprise Author - version 9, it is possible that a Remote Code Execution can be triggered when payload forces a stack-based overflow or a re-use of dangling pointer which refers to overwritten space in memory. | ||||
| CVE-2022-39806 | 1 Sap | 1 3d Visual Enterprise Author | 2026-02-25 | 7.8 High |
| Due to lack of proper memory management, when a victim opens a manipulated SolidWorks Drawing (.slddrw, CoreCadTranslator.exe) file received from untrusted sources in SAP 3D Visual Enterprise Author - version 9, it is possible that a Remote Code Execution can be triggered when payload forces a stack-based overflow or a re-use of dangling pointer which refers to overwritten space in memory. | ||||
| CVE-2022-39805 | 1 Sap | 1 3d Visual Enterprise Author | 2026-02-25 | 7.8 High |
| Due to lack of proper memory management, when a victim opens a manipulated Computer Graphics Metafile (.cgm, CgmTranslator.exe) file received from untrusted sources in SAP 3D Visual Enterprise Author - version 9, it is possible that a Remote Code Execution can be triggered when payload forces a stack-based overflow or a re-use of dangling pointer which refers to overwritten space in memory. | ||||
| CVE-2022-39804 | 1 Sap | 1 3d Visual Enterprise Author | 2026-02-25 | 7.8 High |
| Due to lack of proper memory management, when a victim opens a manipulated SolidWorks Part (.sldprt, CoreCadTranslator.exe) file received from untrusted sources in SAP 3D Visual Enterprise Author - version 9, it is possible that a Remote Code Execution can be triggered when payload forces a stack-based overflow or a re-use of dangling pointer which refers to overwritten space in memory. | ||||
| CVE-2022-39803 | 1 Sap | 1 3d Visual Enterprise Author | 2026-02-25 | 7.8 High |
| Due to lack of proper memory management, when a victim opens a manipulated ACIS Part and Assembly (.sat, CoreCadTranslator.exe) file received from untrusted sources in SAP 3D Visual Enterprise Author - version 9, it is possible that a Remote Code Execution can be triggered when payload forces a stack-based overflow or a re-use of dangling pointer which refers to overwritten space in memory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-26068 | 1 Jm33-m0 | 1 Emp3r0r | 2026-02-25 | 9.9 Critical |
| emp3r0r is a stealth-focused C2 designed by Linux users for Linux environments. Prior to 3.21.1, untrusted agent metadata (Transport, Hostname) is accepted during check-in and later interpolated into tmux shell command strings executed via /bin/sh -c. This enables command injection and remote code execution on the operator host. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.21.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2036 | 1 Gfi | 1 Archiver | 2026-02-24 | N/A |
| GFI Archiver MArc.Store Deserialization of Untrusted Data Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of GFI Archiver. Although authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability, the existing authentication mechanism can be bypassed. The specific flaw exists within the configuration of the MArc.Store.Remoting.exe process. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in deserialization of untrusted data. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of SYSTEM. Was ZDI-CAN-27936. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2037 | 1 Gfi | 1 Archiver | 2026-02-24 | N/A |
| GFI Archiver MArc.Core Deserialization of Untrusted Data Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of GFI Archiver. Although authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability, the existing authentication mechanism can be bypassed. The specific flaw exists within the configuration of the MArc.Core.Remoting.exe process, which listens on port 8017. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in deserialization of untrusted data. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of SYSTEM. Was ZDI-CAN-27935. | ||||
| CVE-2026-26746 | 1 Opensourcepos | 2 Open Source Point Of Sale, Opensourcepos | 2026-02-24 | 8.8 High |
| OpenSourcePOS 3.4.1 contains a Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability in the Sales.php::getInvoice() function. An attacker can read arbitrary files on the web server by manipulating the Invoice Type configuration. This issue can be chained with the file upload functionality to achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE). | ||||
| CVE-2026-27194 | 2 Man, Man-group | 2 D-tale, Dtale | 2026-02-24 | 9.8 Critical |
| D-Tale is a visualizer for pandas data structures. Versions prior to 3.20.0 are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution through the /save-column-filter endpoint. Users hosting D-Tale publicly can be vulnerable to remote code execution allowing attackers to run malicious code on the server. This issue has been fixed in version 3.20.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27206 | 1 Zumba | 1 Json-serializer | 2026-02-24 | 8.1 High |
| Zumba Json Serializer is a library to serialize PHP variables in JSON format. In versions 3.2.2 and below, the library allows deserialization of PHP objects from JSON using a special @type field. The deserializer instantiates any class specified in the @type field without restriction. When processing untrusted JSON input, this behavior may allow an attacker to instantiate arbitrary classes available in the application. If a vulnerable application passes attacker-controlled JSON into JsonSerializer::unserialize() and contains classes with dangerous magic methods (such as __wakeup() or __destruct()), this may lead to PHP Object Injection and potentially Remote Code Execution (RCE), depending on available gadget chains in the application or its dependencies. This behavior is similar in risk profile to PHP's native unserialize() when used without the allowed_classes restriction. Applications are impacted only if untrusted or attacker-controlled JSON is passed into JsonSerializer::unserialize() and the application or its dependencies contain classes that can be leveraged as a gadget chain. This issue has been fixed in version 3.2.3. If an immediate upgrade isn't feasible, mitigate the vulnerability by never deserializing untrusted JSON with JsonSerializer::unserialize(), validating and sanitizing all JSON input before deserialization, and disabling @type-based object instantiation wherever possible. | ||||
| CVE-2021-36958 | 1 Microsoft | 18 Windows, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 15 more | 2026-02-24 | 7.8 High |
| <p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged file operations. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights.</p> | ||||
| CVE-2021-34481 | 1 Microsoft | 19 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 16 more | 2026-02-24 | 8.8 High |
| <p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged file operations. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights.</p> <p><strong>UPDATE</strong> August 10, 2021: Microsoft has completed the investigation and has released security updates to address this vulnerability. Please see the Security Updates table for the applicable update for your system. We recommend that you install these updates immediately. This security update changes the Point and Print default behavior; please see <a href="https://support.microsoft.com/help/5005652">KB5005652</a>.</p> | ||||
| CVE-2021-24105 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Package Manager Configurations | 2026-02-24 | 8.4 High |
| <p>Depending on configuration of various package managers it is possible for an attacker to insert a malicious package into a package manager's repository which can be retrieved and used during development, build, and release processes. This insertion could lead to remote code execution. We believe this vulnerability affects multiple package managers across multiple languages, including but not limited to: Python/pip, .NET/NuGet, Java/Maven, JavaScript/npm.</p> <p><strong>Attack scenarios</strong></p> <p>An attacker could take advantage of this ecosystem-wide issue to cause harm in a variety of ways. The original attack scenarios were discovered by Alex Birsan and are detailed in their whitepaper, <a href="https://medium.com/@alex.birsan/dependency-confusion-4a5d60fec610">Dependency Confusion: How I Hacked Into Apple, Microsoft and Dozens of Other Companies</a>.</p> <ul> <li><p>With basic knowledge of the target ecosystems, an attacker could create an empty shell for a package and insert malicious code in the install scripts, give it a high version, and publish it to the public repository. Vulnerable victim machines will download the higher version of the package between the public and private repositories and attempt to install it. Due to code incompatibility it will probably error out upon import or upon compilation, making it easier to detect; however the attacker would have gained code execution by that point.</p> </li> <li><p>An advanced attacker with some inside knowledge of the target could take a copy of a working package, insert the malicious code (in the package itself or in the install), and then publish it to a public repository. The package will likely install and import correctly, granting the attacker an initial foothold and persistence.</p> </li> </ul> <p>These two methods could affect target organizations at any of these various levels:</p> <ul> <li>Developer machines</li> <li>An entire team if the configuration to import the malicious package is uploaded to a code repository</li> <li>Continuous integration pipelines if they pull the malicious packages during the build, test, and/or deploy stages</li> <li>Customers, download servers, production services if the malicious code has not been detected</li> </ul> <p>This remote code execution vulnerability can only be addressed by reconfiguring installation tools and workflows, and not by correcting anything in the package repositories themselves. See the <strong>FAQ</strong> section of this CVE for configuration guidance.</p> | ||||
| CVE-2025-60036 | 2 Bosch, Bosch Rexroth | 4 Rexroth Indraworks, Rexroth Ua.testclient, Indraworks and 1 more | 2026-02-24 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in the UA.Testclient utility, which is included in Rexroth IndraWorks. All versions prior to 15V24 are affected. This flaw allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the user's system by parsing a manipulated file containing malicious serialized data. Exploitation requires user interaction, specifically opening a specially crafted file, which then causes the application to deserialize the malicious data, enabling Remote Code Execution (RCE). This can lead to a complete compromise of the system running the UA.Testclient. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60037 | 2 Bosch, Bosch Rexroth | 2 Rexroth Indraworks, Indraworks | 2026-02-24 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Rexroth IndraWorks. This flaw allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the user's system by parsing a manipulated file containing malicious serialized data. Exploitation requires user interaction, specifically opening a specially crafted file, which then causes the application to deserialize the malicious data, enabling Remote Code Execution (RCE). This can lead to a complete compromise of the system running Rexroth IndraWorks. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60038 | 2 Bosch, Bosch Rexroth | 2 Rexroth Indraworks, Indraworks | 2026-02-24 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Rexroth IndraWorks. This flaw allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the user's system by parsing a manipulated file containing malicious serialized data. Exploitation requires user interaction, specifically opening a specially crafted file, which then causes the application to deserialize the malicious data, enabling Remote Code Execution (RCE). This can lead to a complete compromise of the system running Rexroth IndraWorks. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60035 | 2 Bosch, Bosch Rexroth | 2 Rexroth Indraworks, Indraworks | 2026-02-24 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in the OPC.Testclient utility, which is included in Rexroth IndraWorks. All versions prior to 15V24 are affected. This flaw allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the user's system by parsing a manipulated file containing malicious serialized data. Exploitation requires user interaction, specifically opening a specially crafted file, which then causes the application to deserialize the malicious data, enabling Remote Code Execution (RCE). This can lead to a complete compromise of the system running the OPC.Testclient. | ||||