Export limit exceeded: 345430 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (345430 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-39811 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiweb | 2026-04-17 | 4.4 Medium |
| A integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiWeb 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiWeb 7.4 all versions, FortiWeb 7.2 all versions, FortiWeb 7.0 all versions may allow attacker to denial of service via <insert attack vector here> | ||||
| CVE-2026-39814 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiweb | 2026-04-17 | 6.2 Medium |
| A relative path traversal vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb 8.0.0 through 8.0.2, FortiWeb 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiWeb 7.4.1 through 7.4.12, FortiWeb 7.2.7 through 7.2.12, FortiWeb 7.0.10 through 7.0.12 may allow attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via <insert attack vector here> | ||||
| CVE-2026-39810 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlientems | 2026-04-17 | 5.2 Medium |
| A use of hard-coded cryptographic key vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientEMS 7.4.0 through 7.4.5 may allow attacker to information disclosure via decrypting database dump. | ||||
| CVE-2026-39809 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlientems | 2026-04-17 | 6.2 Medium |
| A improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientEMS 7.4.0 through 7.4.5, FortiClientEMS 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiClientEMS 7.0 all versions may allow attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via sending crafted requests | ||||
| CVE-2025-61624 | 1 Fortinet | 4 Fortios, Fortipam, Fortiproxy and 1 more | 2026-04-17 | 5.4 Medium |
| An Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') [CWE-22] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.9, FortiOS 7.2 all versions, FortiOS 7.0 all versions, FortiOS 6.4 all versions, FortiPAM 1.7.0, FortiPAM 1.6 all versions, FortiPAM 1.5 all versions, FortiPAM 1.4 all versions, FortiPAM 1.3 all versions, FortiPAM 1.2 all versions, FortiPAM 1.1 all versions, FortiPAM 1.0 all versions, FortiProxy 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiProxy 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiProxy 7.2 all versions, FortiProxy 7.0 all versions, FortiSwitchManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.7, FortiSwitchManager 7.0.0 through 7.0.6 may allow an authenticated attacker with admin profile and at least read-write permissions to write or delete arbitrary files via specific CLI commands. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4369 | 1 Autodesk | 1 Fusion | 2026-04-17 | 7.1 High |
| A maliciously crafted HTML payload in an assembly variant name, when displayed during the delete confirmation dialog and clicked by a user, can trigger a Stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Autodesk Fusion desktop application. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to read local files or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4344 | 1 Autodesk | 1 Fusion | 2026-04-17 | 7.1 High |
| A maliciously crafted HTML payload in a component name, when displayed during the delete confirmation dialog and clicked by a user, can trigger a Stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Autodesk Fusion desktop application. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to read local files or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-37980 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak | 2026-04-17 | 6.9 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak, specifically in the organization selection login page. A remote attacker with `manage-realm` or `manage-organizations` administrative privileges can exploit a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. This flaw occurs because the `organization.alias` is placed into an inline JavaScript `onclick` handler, allowing a crafted JavaScript payload to execute in a user's browser when they view the login page. Successful exploitation enables arbitrary JavaScript execution, potentially leading to session theft, unauthorized account actions, or further attacks against users of the affected realm. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59809 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortisoaron-premise, Fortisoarpaas | 2026-04-17 | 4.1 Medium |
| A server-side request forgery (ssrf) vulnerability [CWE-918] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSOAR PaaS 7.6.4, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.6.0 through 7.6.2, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.5.0 through 7.5.2, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.4 all versions, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.3 all versions, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.6.4, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.6.0 through 7.6.2, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.5.0 through 7.5.2, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.4 all versions, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.3 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to discover services running on local ports via crafted requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4914 | 1 Ivanti | 1 Neurons For Itsm | 2026-04-17 | 5.4 Medium |
| Stored XSS in Ivanti N-ITSM before version 2025.4 allows a remote authenticated attacker to obtain limited information from other user sessions. User interaction is required. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4913 | 1 Ivanti | 1 Neurons For Itsm | 2026-04-17 | 5.7 Medium |
| Improper protection of an alternate path in Ivanti N-ITSM before version 2025.4 allows a remote authenticated attacker to retain access when their account has been disabled. | ||||
| CVE-2025-61886 | 1 Fortinet | 3 Fortisandbox, Fortisandbox Paas, Fortisandboxpaas | 2026-04-17 | 4.9 Medium |
| An Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability [CWE-79] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.4, FortiSandbox PaaS 5.0.0 through 5.0.4 may allow an attacker to perform an XSS attack via crafted HTTP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4345 | 1 Autodesk | 1 Fusion | 2026-04-17 | 7.1 High |
| A maliciously crafted HTML payload, stored in a design name and exported to CSV, can trigger a Stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Autodesk Fusion desktop application. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to read local files or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-5387 | 1 Aveva | 1 Pipeline Simulation 2025 | 2026-04-17 | N/A |
| The vulnerability, if exploited, could allow an unauthenticated miscreant to perform operations intended only for Simulator Instructor or Simulator Developer (Administrator) roles, resulting in privilege escalation with potential for modification of simulation parameters, training configuration, and training records. | ||||
| CVE-2025-67841 | 1 Nordicsemi | 1 Ironside Se | 2026-04-17 | 7.5 High |
| Nordic Semiconductor IronSide SE for nRF54H20 before 23.0.2+17 has an Algorithmic complexity issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4667 | 1 Hp | 1 Omen Gaming Hub | 2026-04-17 | N/A |
| HP System Optimizer might potentially be vulnerable to escalation of privilege. HP is releasing an update to mitigate this potential vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33805 | 2 Fastify, Fastify-reply-from Project | 3 Fastify-http-proxy, Fastify-reply-from, Fastify-reply-from | 2026-04-17 | 7.4 High |
| @fastify/reply-from v12.6.1 and earlier and @fastify/http-proxy v11.4.3 and earlier process the client's Connection header after the proxy has added its own headers via rewriteRequestHeaders. This allows attackers to retroactively strip proxy-added headers from upstream requests by listing them in the Connection header value. Any header added by the proxy for routing, access control, or security purposes can be selectively removed by a client. @fastify/http-proxy is also affected as it delegates to @fastify/reply-from. Upgrade to @fastify/reply-from v12.6.2 or @fastify/http-proxy v11.4.4 or later. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30364 | 1 Ttrftech | 1 Centsdr | 2026-04-17 | 7.5 High |
| CentSDR commit e40795 was discovered to contain a stack overflow in the "Thread1" function. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15610 | 1 Opentext | 1 Rightfax | 2026-04-17 | N/A |
| Deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability in OpenText, Inc RightFax on Windows, 64 bit, 32 bit allows Object Injection.This issue affects RightFax: through 25.4. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20078 | 1 Cisco | 1 Unity Connection | 2026-04-17 | 6.5 Medium |
| Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Unity Connection could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to download arbitrary files from an affected system. To exploit these vulnerabilities, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials. These vulnerabilities are due to improper sanitization of user input to the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending a crafted HTTPS request. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to download arbitrary files from an affected system. | ||||