Export limit exceeded: 385619 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (385619 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-82744 | 1 Ash-project | 1 Ash | 2026-09-01 | N/A |
| Not Failing Securely (Failing Open) vulnerability in ash-project ash skips an Ash.Reactor change when the guard controlling it raises, so a change meant to run does not. An Ash.Reactor change step can be gated by where validations that decide whether the change runs. Ash.Reactor.ChangeStep (lib/ash/reactor/steps/change_step.ex) evaluated those guards in apply_where_clauses/3, and apply_validation rescued any exception into {:error, error}. The reduce treated that identically to a guard whose condition was simply not met and bypassed the change. So when a guard raises (for example on attacker-influenced input), a change that enforces a security-relevant modification is skipped rather than failing the step. The fix distinguishes a raised exception (now {:raised, error}) and halts the step with an error, failing closed. This issue affects ash: from 3.0.0-rc.17 before 3.32.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82745 | 1 Ash-project | 1 Ash | 2026-09-01 | N/A |
| Improper Access Control vulnerability in ash-project ash lets a create action overwrite an existing record when the ETS or Mnesia data layer is used, because neither enforced primary-key uniqueness on insert. Unlike a SQL data layer, whose unique primary-key constraint rejects a duplicate, the ETS and Mnesia data layers implemented create as a keyed insert that replaces any existing entry with the same primary key (lib/ash/data_layer/ets/ets.ex, lib/ash/data_layer/mnesia/mnesia.ex). An actor who can set the primary key on a create (for example a user-supplied string or integer key) can submit a create whose key matches an existing record and silently overwrite it, destroying and replacing another entity's data without going through the update action or its policies. The fix rejects a create whose primary key already exists with an already-taken error, and only allows duplicates for keyless resources. This issue affects ash: from 0.4.0 before 3.32.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82746 | 1 Ash-project | 1 Ash | 2026-09-01 | N/A |
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash allows an actor to update records forbidden by resource policies through the atomic path of Ash.update_many/4. Ash.update_many/4 runs as a single atomic statement (a data-layer update_many, for example a SQL MERGE) whenever an atomic strategy is used and the data layer supports it. Ash.Actions.Update.UpdateMany (lib/ash/actions/update/update_many.ex) took that path even under authorize?: true without applying the resource's policies, so the statement updated every row matched by primary key regardless of the policy filter that authorization would impose. An actor could therefore update records the policies forbid, such as rows belonging to another actor or tenant. The fix restricts the atomic path to data layers supporting changeset filters when authorizing, authorizes each changeset, and merges the resulting policy filter into each changeset so the statement only touches authorized rows. This issue affects ash: from 3.29.0 before 3.32.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82748 | 1 Ash-project | 1 Ash | 2026-09-01 | N/A |
| Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash authorizes an aggregate under one read action while computing it under another, so an aggregate can run with policies that do not match the action it was authorized against. Ash.Actions.Aggregate groups aggregates by their {authorize?, read_action} and authorizes each group under that read action, but when building the data query it selected the action as opts[:action] || read_action || <primary read> (lib/ash/actions/aggregate.ex). When a caller passed an :action option, the aggregate query ran under that action while authorization had been computed for the group's own read_action. If the run action's read policies are more permissive than the authorized one, the aggregate (a count or sum) is computed over records the authorized action's policies would have excluded, disclosing information about data the actor cannot read. The fix runs the aggregate under the same read_action it is authorized against. This issue affects ash: from 3.5.13 before 3.32.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79683 | 1 Dell | 12 Powerstore 1000t, Powerstore 1200t, Powerstore 3000t and 9 more | 2026-09-01 | 8.8 High |
| Dell PowerStore contains a Protection Mechanism Failure vulnerability. An authenticated user with limited privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability to write attacker-controlled content to arbitrary filesystem paths. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58575 | 1 Dell | 12 Powerstore 1000t, Powerstore 1200t, Powerstore 3000t and 9 more | 2026-09-01 | 8.8 High |
| Dell PowerStore contains an Authentication Bypass by Spoofing vulnerability. An authenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to escalate privileges to Administrator. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58571 | 1 Dell | 12 Powerstore 1000t, Powerstore 1200t, Powerstore 3000t and 9 more | 2026-09-01 | 8.8 High |
| Dell PowerStore contains an OS Command Injection vulnerability. An authenticated user with limited privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79686 | 1 Dell | 12 Powerstore 1000t, Powerstore 1200t, Powerstore 3000t and 9 more | 2026-09-01 | 8.8 High |
| Dell PowerStore contains a Protection Mechanism Failure vulnerability. An authenticated user with limited privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability to bypass access restrictions and gain escalated privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58569 | 1 Dell | 12 Powerstore 1000t, Powerstore 1200t, Powerstore 3000t and 9 more | 2026-09-01 | 8.8 High |
| Dell PowerStore contains an Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere vulnerability. An authenticated user with limited privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code with root privileges.. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58572 | 1 Dell | 12 Powerstore 1000t, Powerstore 1200t, Powerstore 3000t and 9 more | 2026-09-01 | 8.8 High |
| Dell PowerStore contains a Code Injection vulnerability. An authenticated user with limited privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code with root privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79684 | 1 Dell | 12 Powerstore 1000t, Powerstore 1200t, Powerstore 3000t and 9 more | 2026-09-01 | 8.8 High |
| Dell PowerStore contains a Protection Mechanism Failure vulnerability. An authenticated user with limited privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability to bypass access restrictions and gain escalated privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79685 | 1 Dell | 12 Powerstore 1000t, Powerstore 1200t, Powerstore 3000t and 9 more | 2026-09-01 | 6.5 Medium |
| Dell PowerStore contains an Argument Injection vulnerability. An authenticated user with limited privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability to gain unauthorized access to sensitive sensitive system information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18771 | 2026-09-01 | 7.5 High | ||
| Missing authentication for critical function vulnerability in TMT Machine Industry and Trade Ltd. Co. Talassoft Industrial Management Software allows Authentication Bypass. This issue affects Talassoft Industrial Management Software: from V4 before V.16. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18630 | 2026-09-01 | 8.8 High | ||
| Improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command ('SQL injection') vulnerability in TMT Machine Industry and Trade Ltd. Co. Talassoft Industrial Management Software allows SQL Injection. This issue affects Talassoft Industrial Management Software: from V.4 before V.16. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18780 | 2026-09-01 | 7.1 High | ||
| Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in TMT Machine Industry and Trade Ltd. Co. Talassoft Industrial Management Software allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Talassoft Industrial Management Software: from V.4 before V.16. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18931 | 2026-09-01 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| Use of Hard-coded Credentials vulnerability in TMT Machine Industry and Trade Ltd. Co. Talassoft Industrial Management Software allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data. This issue affects Talassoft Industrial Management Software: from V.4 before V.16. | ||||
| CVE-2026-53622 | 1 Traefik | 1 Traefik | 2026-09-01 | 10.0 Critical |
| Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Versions prior to 3.7.3, 3.6.18, and 2.11.51 have a critical vulnerability in Traefik's HTTP/3 (QUIC) TLS configuration selection that allows unauthenticated clients to bypass router-specific mTLS enforcement. When HTTP/3 is enabled on an entrypoint, the TLS handshake selects the applicable TLS configuration through an exact, case-sensitive lookup on the SNI value, which fails to match wildcard host patterns (e.g., *.example.com) or case variants of the configured hostname. Because the handshake falls back to the default TLS configuration — which may not require client certificates — a client can complete the QUIC handshake without presenting a certificate, while the subsequent HTTP routing layer still dispatches the request to a backend protected by a router-specific mTLS policy. The issue affects deployments where HTTP/3 is enabled, a router uses a wildcard Host rule or case-insensitive hostname matching, a router-specific TLSOptions enforces client certificate authentication, and UDP access to the entrypoint is reachable by an attacker. This vulnerability is fixed in versions 3.7.3, 3.6.18, and 2.11.51. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73712 | 2026-09-01 | 8.1 High | ||
| A vulnerability in the API of HPE Networking Fabric Composer could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to run arbitrary commands on the underlying host if certain preconditions outside of the attacker's control are met. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system leading to complete system compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84269 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2026-09-01 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the AFP backend in gvfs. When mounting a share, a malicious AFP server can cause the DSI read path to process a length that exceeds the size requested by the client. The function does not verify the server-provided length against the pre-sized reply buffer, causing the operation to access past the intended boundaries. This issue allows a malicious server to overflow a heap buffer and crash the gvfsd-afp process, resulting in a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81624 | 1 Redhat | 9 Build Of Apache Camel For Spring Boot, Camel Spring Boot, Enterprise Linux and 6 more | 2026-09-01 | 7.5 High |
| Undertow is a flexible performant web server used in JBoss EAP and WildFly. A flaw was found in how Undertow handles WebSocket connections. Specifically, certain configuration limits like message buffer sizes and session timeouts cannot be adjusted and default to being unlimited. This allows a remote attacker to send large amounts of data or maintain connections indefinitely, potentially crashing the server by exhausting its memory or other resources. | ||||