Export limit exceeded: 384936 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (384936 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-78960 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-08-31 | 6.5 Medium |
| Information leak in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to obtain cross-origin data via a crafted Chrome extension. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-78967 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-08-31 | 6.5 Medium |
| Missing authorization in BFCache in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass system access restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-78969 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-08-31 | 6.5 Medium |
| Uninitialized resource in Video in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to read memory inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-79003 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-08-31 | 4.3 Medium |
| Incorrect authorization in Device in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to bypass system access restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-79020 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-08-31 | 8.1 High |
| Out of bounds read in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to potentially read memory inside the sandbox via a crafted media file. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-79042 | 1 Google | 2 Android, Chrome | 2026-08-31 | 4.3 Medium |
| Missing authorization in Payments in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to potentially bypass system access restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-79075 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-08-31 | 6.5 Medium |
| Information leak in Geolocation in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to obtain sensitive information via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-79076 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-08-31 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper input validation in Sync in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via crafted network traffic. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2023-47855 | 2 Intel, Netapp | 3 Tdx Module, Trust Domain Extensions Module, Hci Compute Node Bios | 2026-08-31 | 6 Medium |
| Improper input validation in some Intel(R) TDX module software before version 1.5.05.46.698 may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2024-21801 | 1 Intel | 1 Tdx Module | 2026-08-31 | 7.1 High |
| Insufficient control flow management in some Intel(R) TDX module software before version 1.5.05.46.698 may allow a privileged user to potentially enable denial of service via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2024-33607 | 1 Intel | 2 Tdx Module, Tdx Module Software | 2026-08-31 | 5.6 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in some Intel(R) TDX module software before version TDX_1.5.07.00.774 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2023-45745 | 2 Intel, Netapp | 3 Tdx Module, Tdx Module Software, Hci Compute Node Bios | 2026-08-31 | 7.9 High |
| Improper input validation in some Intel(R) TDX module software before version 1.5.05.46.698 may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39283 | 1 Intel | 2 Tdx Module, Tdx Module Software | 2026-08-31 | 6 Medium |
| Incomplete filtering of special elements in Intel(R) TDX module software before version TDX_1.5.01.00.592 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79229 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-08-31 | 6.5 Medium |
| Uninitialized resource in ANGLE in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to read memory outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-82698 | 1 Sambitraj | 1 Student-management-system | 2026-08-31 | 5.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was detected in sambitraj Student-Management-System up to 56ba287f2e9031523ccb4244cb6e3fe530e4e5d5. This affects an unknown function of the file aca.sql. Performing a manipulation results in use of default password. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is now public and may be used. This product follows a rolling release approach for continuous delivery, so version details for affected or updated releases are not provided. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70449 | 1 Apache | 1 Wicket | 2026-08-31 | N/A |
| Improper validation of resource URL attributes in Apache Wicket allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to read files from the web application, including files under WEB-INF that the servlet container would not otherwise serve. The locale, style and variation attributes decoded from a package resource URL are spliced into the resource lookup path without being checked for path separators. The IPackageResourceGuard — whose rejection of .. is one of the two intended controls — is applied to the resource name before those attributes are appended, and WebApplicationPath rejects only paths literally beginning with WEB-INF/. Neither control ever inspects the attacker-controlled portion of the path. On servlet containers that normalize .. in ServletContext.getResource(), a crafted request therefore escapes the intended package directory. The set of readable files is limited to the file extensions permitted by the configured IPackageResourceGuard. The default SecurePackageResourceGuard permits only js, css, png, jpg, jpeg, gif, ico, cur, map, html, txt, swf, bmp, svg, avif, eot, ttf, woff and woff2, which excludes configuration formats. Applications that have added patterns to the guard, or replaced it with the blocklist-based PackageResourceGuard, can additionally disclose configuration files such as web.xml. Independently of the extension, the lookup performed before the guard runs acts as an existence oracle for arbitrary paths. This issue affects Apache Wicket 8.18.0 and before, 9.23.0 and before and 10.10.0 and before. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 8.19.0, 9.24.0 or 10.11.0, which fix the issue. Users of Apache Wicket 7.x or older, which are no longer supported, should upgrade to a supported version. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71378 | 1 Apache | 1 Wicket | 2026-08-31 | N/A |
| ResourceIsolationRequestCycleListener protects a Wicket application against cross-site request forgery by rejecting requests that a resource isolation policy judges to come from another origin. Its default policy, FetchMetadataResourceIsolationPolicy, was derived from a reference implementation written to guard static resources, and it inherited two allowances that are unsafe when the thing being guarded is an action on a page: * Every "simple top-level navigation" was allowed. Any GET request carrying Sec-Fetch-Mode: navigate whose Sec-Fetch-Dest was neither object nor embed was allowed, whatever Sec-Fetch-Site said — including cross-site. Wicket invokes component listeners (Link.onClick(), form submits, behaviour callbacks) through ordinary GET navigations, so a page under an attacker's control could navigate the victim's browser to a listener URL and have that listener run inside the victim's authenticated session. Browsers send SameSite=Lax cookies — the effective default when no SameSite attribute is set — on cross-site top-level GET navigations, so the victim's session cookie accompanied the request. * Sec-Fetch-Site: same-site was allowed unconditionally. That value means the same registrable domain and scheme but a different origin — another subdomain or another port. Any sibling origin could therefore invoke any listener by any method, POST form submits included, and cookies are always sent on same-site requests regardless of SameSite. A hostile sibling origin obtained through a subdomain takeover, through delegated user content, or through an XSS elsewhere on the site could act as the authenticated user. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 9.24.0 or 10.11.0, which fix the issue. Affected versions * Apache Wicket 9.1.0 through 9.23.0 * Apache Wicket 10.0.0 through 10.10.0 Not affected Any release older than 9.1.0: * Apache Wicket 8.x (8.0.0 through 8.17.0). The resource isolation classes do not exist in the 8.x line, which offers only the Origin/Referer-based CsrfPreventionRequestCycleListener. No 8.x release requires a fix. * Apache Wicket 9.0.0. ResourceIsolationRequestCycleListener and FetchMetadataResourceIsolationPolicy were introduced by WICKET-6786 and first shipped in 9.1.0 (released 2020-10-07). | ||||
| CVE-2026-82693 | 1 Tenda | 2 Ac1206, Ac1206 Firmware | 2026-08-31 | 10 Critical |
| A vulnerability was determined in Tenda AC1206 15.03.06.23. This vulnerability affects the function TendaTelnet of the file /goform/telnet of the component Web UI. Executing a manipulation can lead to missing authentication. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81660 | 2 Groundhogg, Wordpress | 2 Groundhogg, Wordpress | 2026-08-31 | 8.8 High |
| The Groundhogg — CRM, Newsletters, and Marketing Automation WordPress plugin before 4.5.13 does not validate or escape values submitted to some optional web form fields before storing them and outputting them back in an administrative area, allowing unauthenticated users to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks against high privilege users. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78364 | 2026-08-31 | 3.5 Low | ||
| The MW WP Form WordPress plugin before 5.1.6 does not sanitise and escape some of its form settings before outputting them back in an admin dashboard page, which could allow users with a role as low as Editor to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks against high privilege users such as admin. | ||||