Export limit exceeded: 343017 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (343017 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-1163 | 2026-04-08 | N/A | ||
| An insufficient session expiration vulnerability exists in the latest version of parisneo/lollms. The application fails to invalidate active sessions after a password reset, allowing an attacker to continue using an old session token. This issue arises due to the absence of logic to reject requests after a period of inactivity and the excessively long default session duration of 31 days. The vulnerability enables an attacker to maintain persistent access to a compromised account, even after the victim resets their password. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3499 | 2026-04-08 | 8.8 High | ||
| The Product Feed PRO for WooCommerce by AdTribes – Product Feeds for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions 13.4.6 through 13.5.2.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ajax_migrate_to_custom_post_type, ajax_adt_clear_custom_attributes_product_meta_keys, ajax_update_file_url_to_lower_case, ajax_use_legacy_filters_and_rules, and ajax_fix_duplicate_feed functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trigger feed migration, clear custom-attribute transient caches, rewrite feed file URLs to lowercase, toggle legacy filter and rule settings, and delete duplicated feed posts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3296 | 2026-04-08 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| The Everest Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all versions up to, and including, 3.4.3 via deserialization of untrusted input from form entry metadata. This is due to the html-admin-page-entries-view.php file calling PHP's native unserialize() on stored entry meta values without passing the allowed_classes parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject a serialized PHP object payload through any public Everest Forms form field. The payload survives sanitize_text_field() sanitization (serialization control characters are not stripped) and is stored in the wp_evf_entrymeta database table. When an administrator views entries or views an individual entry, the unsafe unserialize() call processes the stored data without class restrictions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33810 | 2026-04-08 | N/A | ||
| When verifying a certificate chain containing excluded DNS constraints, these constraints are not correctly applied to wildcard DNS SANs which use a different case than the constraint. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root CA in the VerifyOptions.Roots CertPool, or in the system certificate pool. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32289 | 2026-04-08 | N/A | ||
| Context was not properly tracked across template branches for JS template literals, leading to possibly incorrect escaping of content when branches were used. Additionally template actions within JS template literals did not properly track the brace depth, leading to incorrect escaping being applied. These issues could cause actions within JS template literals to be incorrectly or improperly escaped, leading to XSS vulnerabilities. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32288 | 2026-04-08 | N/A | ||
| tar.Reader can allocate an unbounded amount of memory when reading a maliciously-crafted archive containing a large number of sparse regions encoded in the "old GNU sparse map" format. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32283 | 2026-04-08 | N/A | ||
| If one side of the TLS connection sends multiple key update messages post-handshake in a single record, the connection can deadlock, causing uncontrolled consumption of resources. This can lead to a denial of service. This only affects TLS 1.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32282 | 2026-04-08 | N/A | ||
| On Linux, if the target of Root.Chmod is replaced with a symlink while the chmod operation is in progress, Chmod can operate on the target of the symlink, even when the target lies outside the root. The Linux fchmodat syscall silently ignores the AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW flag, which Root.Chmod uses to avoid symlink traversal. Root.Chmod checks its target before acting and returns an error if the target is a symlink lying outside the root, so the impact is limited to cases where the target is replaced with a symlink between the check and operation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32281 | 2026-04-08 | N/A | ||
| Validating certificate chains which use policies is unexpectedly inefficient when certificates in the chain contain a very large number of policy mappings, possibly causing denial of service. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root CA in the VerifyOptions.Roots CertPool, or in the system certificate pool. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32280 | 2026-04-08 | N/A | ||
| During chain building, the amount of work that is done is not correctly limited when a large number of intermediate certificates are passed in VerifyOptions.Intermediates, which can lead to a denial of service. This affects both direct users of crypto/x509 and users of crypto/tls. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27144 | 2026-04-08 | N/A | ||
| The compiler is meant to unwrap pointers which are the operands of a memory move; a no-op interface conversion prevented the compiler from making the correct determination about non-overlapping moves, potentially leading to memory corruption at runtime. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27143 | 2026-04-08 | N/A | ||
| Arithmetic over induction variables in loops were not correctly checked for underflow or overflow. As a result, the compiler would allow for invalid indexing to occur at runtime, potentially leading to memory corruption. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27140 | 2026-04-08 | N/A | ||
| SWIG file names containing 'cgo' and well-crafted payloads could lead to code smuggling and arbitrary code execution at build time due to trust layer bypass. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14732 | 2026-04-08 | 6.4 Medium | ||
| The Elementor Website Builder – More Than Just a Page Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via several widget parameters in all versions up to, and including, 3.35.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. | ||||
| CVE-2026-5726 | 1 Deltaww | 1 Asda-soft | 2026-04-08 | 7.8 High |
| ASDA-Soft Stack-based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2026-4788 | 1 Ibm | 1 Tivoli Netcool Impact | 2026-04-08 | 8.4 High |
| IBM Tivoli Netcool Impact 7.1.0.0 through 7.1.0.37 stores sensitive information in log files that could be read by a local user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3357 | 1 Ibm | 1 Langflow Desktop | 2026-04-08 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow Desktop 1.6.0 through 1.8.2 Langflow could allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by an insecure default setting which permits the deserialization of untrusted data in the FAISS component. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1346 | 1 Ibm | 4 Security Verify Access, Security Verify Access Container, Verify Identity Access and 1 more | 2026-04-08 | 9.3 Critical |
| IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 could allow a locally authenticated user to escalate their privileges to root due to execution with unnecessary privileges than required. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1343 | 1 Ibm | 4 Security Verify Access, Security Verify Access Container, Verify Identity Access and 1 more | 2026-04-08 | 7.2 High |
| IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 allows an attacker to contact internal authentication endpoints which are protected by the Reverse Proxy. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1491 | 1 Ibm | 4 Security Verify Access, Security Verify Access Container, Verify Identity Access and 1 more | 2026-04-08 | 5.3 Medium |
| IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 IBM Security Verify could allow a remote attacker to access sensitive information due to an inconsistent interpretation of an HTTP request by a reverse proxy. | ||||