The ML-KEM ARM64 NEON ciphertext comparison only compares half of the input, breaking the Fujisaki-Okamoto transform's implicit rejection and weakening IND-CCA2 security on that code path. The constant-time comparison effectively ignored part of the re-encrypted ciphertext, so a decapsulating party could fail to detect a manipulated ciphertext and proceed without the standard's required implicit rejection.
Project Subscriptions
No data.
Advisories
No advisories yet.
Fixes
Solution
No solution given by the vendor.
Workaround
No workaround given by the vendor.
References
History
Thu, 25 Jun 2026 21:30:00 +0000
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| Description | The ML-KEM ARM64 NEON ciphertext comparison only compares half of the input, breaking the Fujisaki-Okamoto transform's implicit rejection and weakening IND-CCA2 security on that code path. The constant-time comparison effectively ignored part of the re-encrypted ciphertext, so a decapsulating party could fail to detect a manipulated ciphertext and proceed without the standard's required implicit rejection. | |
| Title | ML-KEM ARM64 NEON ciphertext comparison only compares half of the input | |
| Weaknesses | CWE-327 | |
| References |
| |
| Metrics |
cvssV4_0
|
Projects
Sign in to view the affected projects.
Status: PUBLISHED
Assigner: wolfSSL
Published:
Updated: 2026-06-25T21:01:19.563Z
Reserved: 2026-04-15T03:08:30.514Z
Link: CVE-2026-6330
No data.
No data.
No data.
OpenCVE Enrichment
No data.
Weaknesses