Export limit exceeded: 349375 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (45785 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-48206 | 1 Nitsantech | 1 Ns-backup | 2025-08-01 | 6.1 Medium |
| The ns_backup extension through 13.0.0 for TYPO3 allows XSS. | ||||
| CVE-2023-36390 | 1 Siemens | 22 Ruggedcom Rox Mx5000, Ruggedcom Rox Mx5000 Firmware, Ruggedcom Rox Mx5000re and 19 more | 2025-08-01 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 (All versions < V2.16.0). A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the web interface of the affected application that could allow an attacker to execute malicious javascript code by tricking users into accessing a malicious link. The value is reflected in the response without sanitization while throwing an “invalid params element name” error on the action parameters. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1289 | 1 Coffee-code | 1 Plugin Oficial | 2025-08-01 | 4.8 Medium |
| The Plugin Oficial WordPress plugin through 1.7.3 does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example in multisite setup). | ||||
| CVE-2025-1303 | 1 Coffee-code | 1 Plugin Oficial | 2025-08-01 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Plugin Oficial WordPress plugin through 1.7.3 does not sanitise and escape a parameter before outputting it back in the page, leading to a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting which could be used against only unauthenticated users. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4567 | 1 Infornweb | 1 Post Slider And Post Carousel | 2025-08-01 | 4.8 Medium |
| The Post Slider and Post Carousel with Post Vertical Scrolling Widget WordPress plugin before 3.2.10 does not validate and escape some of its Widget options before outputting them back in a page/post where the block is embed, which could allow users with the contributor role and above to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2025-47042 | 1 Adobe | 2 Adobe Experience Manager, Experience Manager | 2025-08-01 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. | ||||
| CVE-2025-47041 | 1 Adobe | 2 Adobe Experience Manager, Experience Manager | 2025-08-01 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. | ||||
| CVE-2025-47040 | 1 Adobe | 2 Adobe Experience Manager, Experience Manager | 2025-08-01 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. | ||||
| CVE-2025-47039 | 1 Adobe | 2 Adobe Experience Manager, Experience Manager | 2025-08-01 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0183 | 1 Binary-husky | 1 Gpt Academic | 2025-08-01 | N/A |
| A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the Latex Proof-Reading Module of binary-husky/gpt_academic version 3.9.0. This vulnerability allows an attacker to inject malicious scripts into the `debug_log.html` file generated by the module. When an admin visits this debug report, the injected scripts can execute, potentially leading to unauthorized actions and data access. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8027 | 1 Youdao | 1 Qanything | 2025-08-01 | N/A |
| A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in netease-youdao/QAnything. Attackers can upload malicious knowledge files to the knowledge base, which can trigger XSS attacks during user chats. This vulnerability affects all versions prior to the fix. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27242 | 1 Zoom | 1 Zoom | 2025-07-31 | 4.1 Medium |
| Cross site scripting in Zoom Desktop Client for Linux before version 5.17.10 may allow an authenticated user to conduct a denial of service via network access. | ||||
| CVE-2024-20258 | 1 Cisco | 25 Asyncos, Secure Email And Web Manager M170, Secure Email And Web Manager M190 and 22 more | 2025-07-31 | 6.1 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager and Secure Email Gateway could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct an XSS attack against a user of the interface. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of an affected interface to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the affected interface or access sensitive, browser-based information. | ||||
| CVE-2024-26157 | 1 Etictelecom | 1 Remote Access Server Firmware | 2025-07-31 | 6.1 Medium |
| All versions of ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) prior to 4.5.0 are vulnerable to reflected cross site scripting (XSS) attacks in get view method under view parameter. The ETIC RAS web server uses dynamic pages that get their input from the client side and reflect the input in their response to the client. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20147 | 1 Cisco | 1 Catalyst Sd-wan Manager | 2025-07-31 | 5.4 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager, formerly Cisco SD-WAN vManage, could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a stored cross-site scripting attack (XSS) on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to improper sanitization of user input to the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting a malicious script through the interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to conduct a stored XSS attack on the affected system. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8211 | 1 Roothub | 1 Roothub | 2025-07-31 | 3.5 Low |
| A vulnerability was found in Roothub up to 2.6. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the function Edit of the file src/main/java/cn/roothub/web/admin/SystemConfigAdminController.java. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20116 | 1 Cisco | 1 Application Policy Infrastructure Controller | 2025-07-31 | 4.8 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the web UI of Cisco APIC could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to perform a stored XSS attack on an affected system. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials. This vulnerability is due to improper input validation in the web UI. An authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious code into specific pages of the web UI. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the web UI or access sensitive, browser-based information. | ||||
| CVE-2024-20514 | 1 Cisco | 2 Evolved Programmable Network Manager, Prime Infrastructure | 2025-07-31 | 5.4 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Evolved Programmable Network Manager (EPNM) and Cisco Prime Infrastructure could allow an authenticated, low-privileged, remote attacker to conduct a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the interface. This vulnerability exists because the web-based management interface does not properly validate user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious code into a specific page of the interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the affected interface or access sensitive browser-based information. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have at least a low-privileged account on an affected device. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8206 | 1 Comodo | 1 Dragon | 2025-07-31 | 3.1 Low |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Comodo Dragon up to 134.0.6998.179. This affects an unknown part of the component IP DNS Leakage Detector. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20310 | 1 Cisco | 1 Enterprise Chat And Email | 2025-07-31 | 6.1 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the web UI of Cisco Enterprise Chat and Email (ECE) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the interface. This vulnerability exists because the web UI does not properly validate user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the affected interface or access sensitive, browser-based information. To successfully exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need valid agent credentials. | ||||