Search Results (19669 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2025-30376 1 Microsoft 11 365 Apps, Excel, Excel 2016 and 8 more 2026-02-13 7.8 High
Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.
CVE-2025-29979 1 Microsoft 11 365 Apps, Excel, Office and 8 more 2026-02-13 7.8 High
Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.
CVE-2025-29967 1 Microsoft 25 Remote Desktop, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 22 more 2026-02-13 8.8 High
Heap-based buffer overflow in Remote Desktop Gateway Service allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
CVE-2025-29966 1 Microsoft 26 Remote Desktop, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 23 more 2026-02-13 8.8 High
Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Remote Desktop allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
CVE-2026-25763 1 Openproject 1 Openproject 2026-02-13 9.9 Critical
OpenProject is an open-source, web-based project management software. Prior to versions 16.6.7 and 17.0.3, an arbitrary file write vulnerability exists in OpenProject’s repository changes endpoint (/projects/:project_id/repository/changes) when rendering the “latest changes” view via git log. By supplying a specially crafted rev value (for example, rev=--output=/tmp/poc.txt), an attacker can inject git log command-line options. When OpenProject executes the SCM command, Git interprets the attacker-controlled rev as an option and writes the output to an attacker-chosen path. As a result, any user with the :browse_repository permission on the project can create or overwrite arbitrary files that the OpenProject process user is permitted to write. The written contents consist of git log output, but by crafting custom commits the attacker can still upload valid shell scripts, ultimately leading to RCE. The RCE lets the attacker create a reverse shell to the target host and view confidential files outside of OpenProject, such as /etc/passwd. This issue has been patched in versions 16.6.7 and 17.0.3.
CVE-2025-51958 1 Aelsantex 1 Runcommand 2026-02-13 9.8 Critical
aelsantex runcommand 2014-04-01, a plugin for DokuWiki, allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via lib/plugins/runcommand/postaction.php.
CVE-2026-25593 1 Openclaw 1 Openclaw 2026-02-13 8.4 High
OpenClaw is a personal AI assistant. Prior to 2026.1.20, an unauthenticated local client could use the Gateway WebSocket API to write config via config.apply and set unsafe cliPath values that were later used for command discovery, enabling command injection as the gateway user. This vulnerability is fixed in 2026.1.20.
CVE-2026-25157 2 Apple, Openclaw 2 Macos, Openclaw 2026-02-13 7.8 High
OpenClaw is a personal AI assistant. Prior to version 2026.1.29, there is an OS command injection vulnerability via the Project Root Path in sshNodeCommand. The sshNodeCommand function constructed a shell script without properly escaping the user-supplied project path in an error message. When the cd command failed, the unescaped path was interpolated directly into an echo statement, allowing arbitrary command execution on the remote SSH host. The parseSSHTarget function did not validate that SSH target strings could not begin with a dash. An attacker-supplied target like -oProxyCommand=... would be interpreted as an SSH configuration flag rather than a hostname, allowing arbitrary command execution on the local machine. This issue has been patched in version 2026.1.29.
CVE-2026-24763 1 Openclaw 1 Openclaw 2026-02-13 8.8 High
OpenClaw (formerly Clawdbot) is a personal AI assistant you run on your own devices. Prior to 2026.1.29, a command injection vulnerability existed in OpenClaw’s Docker sandbox execution mechanism due to unsafe handling of the PATH environment variable when constructing shell commands. An authenticated user able to control environment variables could influence command execution within the container context. This vulnerability is fixed in 2026.1.29.
CVE-2024-56808 1 Qnap 1 Media Streaming Add-on 2026-02-12 7.8 High
A command injection vulnerability has been reported to affect Media Streaming add-on. If an attacker gains local network access who have also gained a user account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version: Media Streaming add-on 500.1.1.6 ( 2024/08/02 ) and later
CVE-2025-64091 1 Zenitel 3 Tcis-3, Tcis-3+, Tcis-3 Firmware 2026-02-12 8.6 High
This vulnerability allows authenticated attackers to execute commands via the NTP-configuration of the device.
CVE-2026-26029 1 Akutishevsky 1 Sf-mcp-server 2026-02-12 7.5 High
sf-mcp-server is an implementation of Salesforce MCP server for Claude for Desktop. A command injection vulnerability exists in sf-mcp-server due to unsafe use of child_process.exec when constructing Salesforce CLI commands with user-controlled input. Successful exploitation allows attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of the MCP server process.
CVE-2025-65480 1 Pacom 1 Unison Client 2026-02-12 8.8 High
An issue was discovered in Pacom Unison Client 5.13.1. Authenticated users can inject malicious scripts in the Report Templates which are executed when certain script conditions are fulfilled, leading to Remote Code Execution.
CVE-2025-56590 1 Apryse 2 Html2pdf, Html2pdf Sdk 2026-02-12 9.8 Critical
An issue was discovered in the InsertFromURL() function of the Apryse HTML2PDF SDK thru 11.10. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary operating system commands on the local server.
CVE-2025-57709 2 Qnap, Qnap Systems 2 Qsync Central, Qsync Central 2026-02-12 8.1 High
A buffer overflow vulnerability has been reported to affect Qsync Central. If a remote attacker gains a user account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to modify memory or crash processes. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version: Qsync Central 5.0.0.4 ( 2026/01/20 ) and later
CVE-2025-54149 2 Qnap, Qnap Systems 2 Qsync Central, Qsync Central 2026-02-12 5.5 Medium
An uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability has been reported to affect Qsync Central. If a local attacker gains a user account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to launch a denial-of-service (DoS) attack. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version: Qsync Central 5.0.0.4 ( 2026/01/20 ) and later
CVE-2025-54150 2 Qnap, Qnap Systems 2 Qsync Central, Qsync Central 2026-02-12 5.5 Medium
An uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability has been reported to affect Qsync Central. If a local attacker gains a user account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to launch a denial-of-service (DoS) attack. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version: Qsync Central 5.0.0.4 ( 2026/01/20 ) and later
CVE-2025-54151 2 Qnap, Qnap Systems 2 Qsync Central, Qsync Central 2026-02-12 5.5 Medium
An uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability has been reported to affect Qsync Central. If a local attacker gains a user account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to launch a denial-of-service (DoS) attack. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version: Qsync Central 5.0.0.4 ( 2026/01/20 ) and later
CVE-2025-29949 1 Amd 17 Ryzen 5000 Series Desktop Processors, Ryzen 5000 Series Desktop Processors With Radeon Graphics, Ryzen 5000 Series Mobile Processors With Radeon Graphics and 14 more 2026-02-12 N/A
Insufficient input parameter sanitization in AMD Secure Processor (ASP) Boot Loader (legacy recovery mode only) could allow an attacker to write out-of-bounds to corrupt Secure DRAM potentially resulting in denial of service.
CVE-2025-32008 1 Intel 1 Intel Amt And Intel Standard Manageability 2026-02-11 8.6 High
Out-of-bounds write in the firmware for the Intel(R) AMT and Intel(R) Standard Manageability within Ring 3: User Applications may allow a denial of service. Network adversary with an unauthenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable denial of service. This result may potentially occur via network access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (low) impacts.