| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Improper key usage control in AMD Secure Processor
(ASP) may allow an attacker with local access who has gained arbitrary code
execution privilege in ASP to
extract ASP cryptographic keys, potentially resulting in loss of
confidentiality and integrity. |
| A Speculative Race Condition (SRC) vulnerability that impacts modern CPU architectures supporting speculative execution (related to Spectre V1) has been disclosed. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability to disclose arbitrary data from the CPU using race conditions to access the speculative executable code paths. |
| Improper input validation in the AMD Graphics Driver could allow an attacker to supply a specially crafted pointer, potentially leading to arbitrary writes or denial of service. |
| Improper access control in AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) firmware could allow a malicious hypervisor to bypass RMP protections, potentially resulting in a loss of SEV-SNP guest memory integrity. |
| Improper input validation in system management mode (SMM) could allow a privileged attacker to overwrite stack memory leading to arbitrary code execution. |
| Insufficient parameter validation while allocating process space in the Trusted OS (TOS) may allow for a malicious userspace process to trigger an integer overflow, leading to a potential denial of service. |
| Improper bound check within AMD CPU microcode can allow a malicious guest to write to host memory, potentially resulting in loss of integrity. |
| Debug code left active in AMD's Video Decoder Engine Firmware (VCN FW) could allow a attacker to submit a maliciously crafted command causing the VCN FW to perform read/writes HW registers, potentially impacting confidentiality, integrity and availabilability of the system. |
| Improper input validation within the XOCL driver may allow a local attacker to generate an integer overflow condition, potentially resulting in crash or denial of service. |
| An out-of-bounds read in the ASP could allow a privileged attacker with access to a malicious bootloader to potentially read sensitive memory resulting in loss of confidentiality. |
| Use of an uninitialized variable in the ASP could allow an attacker to access leftover data from a trusted execution environment (TEE) driver, potentially leading to loss of confidentiality. |
| Improper isolation of shared resources on System-on-a-chip (SOC) could a privileged attacker to tamper with the contents of the PSP reserved DRAM region potentially resulting in loss of confidentiality and integrity. |
| Failure to validate the address and size in TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) may allow a malicious x86 attacker to send malformed messages to the graphics mailbox resulting in an overlap of a TMR (Trusted Memory Region) that was previously allocated by the ASP bootloader leading to a potential loss of integrity. |
| Type confusion in the ASP could allow an attacker to pass a malformed argument to the Reliability, Availability, and Serviceability trusted application (RAS TA) potentially leading to a read or write to shared memory resulting in loss of confidentiality, integrity, or availability. |
| Insufficient Granularity of Access Control in SEV firmware can allow a privileged attacker to create a SEV-ES Guest to attack SNP guest, potentially resulting in a loss of confidentiality. |
| A use after free in the SEV firmware could allow a malicous hypervisor to activate a migrated guest with the SINGLE_SOCKET policy on a different socket than the migration agent potentially resulting in loss of integrity. |
| Improper input validation within RAS TA Driver can allow a local attacker to access out-of-bounds memory, potentially resulting in a denial-of-service condition. |
| Improper access control within AMD SEV-SNP could allow an admin privileged attacker to write to the RMP during SNP initialization, potentially resulting in a loss of SEV-SNP guest memory integrity. |
| Improper restriction of operations in the IOMMU could allow a malicious hypervisor to access guest private memory resulting in loss of integrity. |
| Improper handling of error condition during host-induced faults can allow a local high-privileged attack to selectively drop guest DMA writes, potentially resulting in a loss of SEV-SNP guest memory integrity |
