| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The CWSAPI SOAP service in HP ArcSight SmartConnectors before 7.1.6 has a hardcoded password, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain administrative access by leveraging knowledge of this password. |
| HP ArcSight Logger before 6.0 P2 does not limit attempts to authenticate to the SOAP interface, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access via a brute-force approach. |
| Sure Start on HP Commercial PCs 2015 allows local users to cause a denial of service (BIOS recovery failure) by leveraging administrative access. |
| The VGA module in QEMU improperly performs bounds checking on banked access to video memory, which allows local guest OS administrators to execute arbitrary code on the host by changing access modes after setting the bank register, aka the "Dark Portal" issue. |
| ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.9-P2, 9.10.x before 9.10.4-P2, and 9.11.x before 9.11.0b2, when lwresd or the named lwres option is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a long request that uses the lightweight resolver protocol. |
| HPE Data Protector before 7.03_108, 8.x before 8.15, and 9.x before 9.06 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, aka ZDI-CAN-3354. |
| HP Systems Insight Manager (SIM) before 7.5.0, as used in HP Matrix Operating Environment before 7.5.0 and other products, allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information or modify data via unspecified vectors. |
| HP Systems Insight Manager (SIM) before 7.5.0, as used in HP Matrix Operating Environment before 7.5.0 and other products, allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-5403. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in HP Operations Manager i (OMi) 9.22, 9.23, 9.24, 9.25, 10.00, and 10.01 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors. |
| HP ArcSight Logger before 6.0 P2 allows remote authenticated users to bypass the intended authorization policy via unspecified vectors. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in HP Intelligent Provisioning 1.00 through 1.62(a), 2.00, and 2.10 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP System Management Homepage (SMH) before 7.5.0 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the execve system-call implementation in HP HP-UX B.11.11, B.11.23, and B.11.31 allows local users to gain privileges via unknown vectors. |
| HPE Systems Insight Manager (SIM) before 7.5.1 allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information or modify data via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-2017, CVE-2016-2019, CVE-2016-2020, CVE-2016-2021, and CVE-2016-2030. |
| HPE Data Protector before 7.03_108, 8.x before 8.15, and 9.x before 9.06 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, aka ZDI-CAN-3352. |
| The REST layer on HP SDN VAN Controller devices 2.5 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via network traffic to the REST port. |
| HP Network Virtualization for LoadRunner and Performance Center 8.61 and 11.52 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a crafted filename in a URL to the (1) HttpServlet or (2) NetworkEditorController component, aka ZDI-CAN-2569. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in HP SiteScope 11.1x before 11.13, 11.2x before 11.24.391, and 11.3x before 11.30.521 allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges via unknown vectors, aka ZDI-CAN-2567. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Secure Pull Print and Security Pull Print components in HP Access Control (AC) Software 12.x through 14.x before 14.1.2 allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information via unknown vectors. |
| HP TippingPoint Security Management System (SMS) and TippingPoint Virtual Security Management System (vSMS) before 4.1 patch 3 and 4.2 before patch 1 do not require authentication for JBoss RMI requests, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by (1) uploading this code within an archive or (2) instantiating a class. |