| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Akaunting 3.1.21 contains an authenticated stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the reusable delete confirmation flow. A user with permission to create or modify records, such as Items, can store HTML/JavaScript in the record name. |
| Akaunting 3.1.21 contains an authenticated stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the document timeline shown on invoice and bill detail pages. An authenticated user can store HTML/JavaScript in their own profile name. |
| The geomap panel's XYZ tile layer has a sanitize-then-interpolate ordering bug. sanitizeTextPanelContent() runs on the raw template string before getTemplateSrv().replace() substitutes the variable value, which uses the glob format with no HTML escaping. The result is passed to OpenLayers via element.innerHTML. An Editor can set a textbox variable's default value to an XSS payload that executes for every user who opens the dashboard. This is a bypass of the CVE-2023-0507 fix |
| A stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Runtime component of Pilz PASvisu before 1.14.1 and PMI v8xx up to and including 2.0.33992 allows a low-privileged remote unauthenticated attacker to manipulate process data with potential impact on integrity and/or availability. |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server with certain access levels it was possible to embed a Cross-Site Scripting Payload via artifacts. |
| The Blocksy Companion plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.45 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with editor-level permissions and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled. |
| A cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Builder Component of Pilz PASvisu before 1.14.1 allows a local unauthenticated attacker to inject malicious javascript and gain full control over the device. |
| Craft CMS 4.x (>= 4.0.0-RC1, < 4.17.0-beta.1) and 5.x (>= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.9.0-beta.1) contain multiple stored cross-site scripting vulnerabilities where settings names and field option labels are rendered without sanitization (e.g., via the checkbox.twig template, which used {{ label|raw }}). An authenticated administrator (with allowAdminChanges enabled) can inject malicious payloads into section names, volume names, user group names, global set names, generated field names, checkbox/radio option labels, and custom source labels, causing arbitrary JavaScript to execute in other users' control-panel sessions. Fixed in 4.17.0-beta.1 and 5.9.0-beta.1. |
| EasyFlow .NET developed by Digiwin has a Stored Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability, allowing authenticated remote attackers to inject persistent JavaScript code executed in users' browsers upon page load. |
| The ultimate-woocommerce-auction-pro WordPress plugin through 2.4.5 does not sanitise and escape a parameter before outputting it back in the page, leading to a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting which could be used against high privilege users such as admin |
| The BetterDocs - Knowledge Base Docs & FAQ Solution for Elementor & Block Editor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the blockId attribute of the betterdocs/category-slate-layout Gutenberg block in versions up to, and including, 4.5.3. This is due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping in the CategorySlateLayout::render() method, which echoes the blockId block attribute directly into an HTML class attribute without esc_attr(). This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. |
| The Transbank Webpay WordPress plugin before 1.14.0 does not sanitize and escape logs to be displayed, allowing unauthenticated users to perform Stored XSS attacks against logged in administrator |
| SiYuan before v3.6.1 fails to sanitize package metadata and README content in the Bazaar marketplace, allowing malicious package authors to inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript. Attackers can achieve remote code execution on any user browsing the Bazaar by embedding XSS payloads in package displayName, description, or README fields, exploiting Electron's nodeIntegration setting to execute OS commands. |
| SiYuan before v3.6.1 fails to sanitize package metadata and README content in the Bazaar marketplace, allowing malicious package authors to inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript. Attackers can achieve remote code execution on any user browsing the Bazaar by embedding XSS payloads in package displayName, description, or README fields, exploiting Electron's nodeIntegration setting to execute OS commands. |
| Worksnaps before version 1.6.20260201 contains hardcoded cloud credentials and related secret material in the Worksnaps client application binaries. The exposed credentials included AWS access keys, S3 bucket names, and related cloud access information. The originally exposed AWS credentials authenticated as the AWS account root identity and provided access to Worksnaps production cloud resources, including S3 buckets containing sensitive data such as screenshots of user desktops. An attacker with access to the affected client binaries could extract or recover the credentials and use them to access affected Worksnaps cloud resources. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in MagOne <= 9.0 versions. |
| Remark42 is a self-hosted comment engine for blogs, articles, or any other place where readers can add comments. Versions 1.6.0 through 1.15.0 contain a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable through content-type spoofing. The Remark42 image proxy fetches an arbitrary remote URL and re-serves the response from Remark42's own origin. During the download phase, the proxy determines whether the resource is an image by inspecting only the Content-Type header advertised by the remote server, never examining the actual bytes; during the serving phase, it instead derives the response Content-Type by sniffing those bytes with http.DetectContentType. An attacker can exploit this inconsistency by hosting a URL that advertises Content-Type: image/png while returning an HTML/JavaScript body: the download check accepts it as an image, the serving path sniffs the body and emits Content-Type: text/html, and the browser renders the attacker-controlled HTML/JavaScript as a document within Remark42's origin. Exploitation requires no Remark42 account on the target instance; the attacker only needs to host the malicious upstream URL and deliver the proxy link to a victim by any means, such as email, direct message, or a link on another website. This issue has been fixed in version 1.16.0. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in my flatonica <= 0.0.8 versions. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in Sonaar <= 4.27.4 versions. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in Auto Repair <= 22.6 versions. |
