| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Buffer overflow in bindsock in Lotus Domino 5.0.4 and 5.0.7 on Linux allows local users to gain root privileges via a long (1) Notes_ExecDirectory or (2) PATH environment variable. |
| acpRunner ActiveX 1.2.5.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the (1) DownLoadURL, (2) SaveFilePath, and (3) Download ActiveX methods. |
| Format string vulnerabilities in Lotus Domino R5 before R5.0.7a allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code, as demonstrated by the PROTOS LDAPv3 test suite. |
| IBM DB2 Universal Database (UDB) before 8.2 FixPak 12 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) by sending "incorrect information ... regarding the package name/creator," which leads to a "memory overwrite." |
| LVM for AIX 5.1 and 5.2 allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in IBM DB2 Universal Database (UDB) before 8.1 FixPak 12 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a (1) "long column list" in the (a) REPLACE INTO and (b) INSERT INTO portions of the LOAD command or a (2) large number of values in an IN clause, possibly related to a buffer overflow. |
| Multiple buffer overflows in LVM for AIX 5.1 and 5.2 allow local users to gain privileges via the (1) putlvcb or (2) getlvcb commands. |
| Buffer overflows in Lotus Domino R5 before R5.0.7a allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code, as demonstrated by the PROTOS LDAPv3 test suite. |
| The ToolTalk ttsession daemon uses weak RPC authentication, which allows a remote attacker to execute commands. |
| Argument injection vulnerability in IBM Lotus Notes 6.0.3 and 6.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a notes: URI that uses a UNC network share pathname to provide an alternate notes.ini configuration file to notes.exe. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in IBM Lotus Notes and Domino Server before 6.5.5, when running on AIX, allows attackers to cause a denial of service (deep recursion leading to stack overflow and crash) via long formulas. |
| Buffer overflow in nslookup for AIX 4.3 allows local users to execute arbitrary code via a long hostname command line argument. |
| IBM Cloudscape 5.1 running jdk 1.4.2_03 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary programs or cause a denial of service via certain SQL code, possibly due to a SQL injection vulnerability. |
| IBM SecureWay 3.2.1 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code, via invalid encodings for the L field of a BER encoding, as demonstrated by the PROTOS LDAPv3 test suite. |
| IBM GINA, when used for OS/2 domain authentication of Windows NT users, allows local users to gain administrator privileges by changing the GroupMapping registry key. |
| Buffer overflow in the lex routines of nslookup for AIX 4.3 may allow attackers to cause a core dump and possibly execute arbitrary code via "long input strings." |
| Buffer overflow in the Lotus Notes client for Domino 6.5 before 6.5.4 and 6.0 before 6.0.5 allows local users to cause a denial of service (client crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via the NOTES.INI file. |
| AIX techlibss allows local users to overwrite files via a symlink attack. |
| Buffer overflows in IBM SecureWay 3.2.1 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code, as demonstrated by the PROTOS LDAPv3 test suite. |
| Lotus Domino R5 and R6 WebMail, with "Generate HTML for all fields" enabled, stores sensitive data from names.nsf in hidden form fields, which allows remote attackers to read the HTML source to obtain sensitive information such as (1) the password hash in the HTTPPassword field, (2) the password change date in the HTTPPasswordChangeDate field, (3) the client platform in the ClntPltfrm field, (4) the client machine name in the ClntMachine field, and (5) the client Lotus Domino release in the ClntBld field, a different vulnerability than CVE-2005-2696. |