| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the Email Server component in Oracle Collaboration Suite 9.0.4.2, 10.1.1, 10.1.2.0, and 10.1.2.1 have unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Vuln# (1) OCS01, (2) OCS02, (3) OCS03, and (4) OCS04. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle E-Business Suite and Applications 11.5.10CU2 have unknown impact and attack vectors, as identified by Vuln# (1) APPS01 in the (a) Application Install component; (2) APPS09 in the (b) Oracle Diagnostics Interfaces component; (3) APPS10 in the (c) Oracle General Ledger component; (4) APPS12 and (5) APPS13 in the (d) Oracle Receivables component. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Financials for Asia/Pacific component in Oracle E-Business Suite and Applications 11.5.9 has unknown impact and attack vectors. component, aka Vuln# APPS02. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle E-Business Suite and Applications 11.5.10 have unknown impact and attack vectors, as identified by Vuln# (1) APPS03 in (a) iProcurement; (2) APPS04 in (b) Oracle Application Object Library; (3) APPS06, (4) APPS07, and (5) APPS08 in (c) Oracle Applications Technology Stack; and (6) APPS11 in (d) Oracle Order Capture. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the XML Database component of Oracle Database server 9.2.0.7 and 10.1.0.4 has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# DB29. NOTE: based on mutual credits by the relevant sources, it is highly likely that this issue is a buffer overflow in the (a) DBMS_XMLSCHEMA and (b) DBMS_XMLSCHEMA_INT packages, as exploitable via long arguments to (1) XDB.DBMS_XMLSCHEMA.GENERATESCHEMA or (2) XDB.DBMS_XMLSCHEMA.GENERATESCHEMAS. |
| The check_connection function in sql_parse.cc in MySQL 4.0.x up to 4.0.26, 4.1.x up to 4.1.18, and 5.0.x up to 5.0.20 allows remote attackers to read portions of memory via a username without a trailing null byte, which causes a buffer over-read. |
| Buffer overflow in the open_table function in sql_base.cc in MySQL 5.0.x up to 5.0.20 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted COM_TABLE_DUMP packets with invalid length values. |
| Oracle Database 9.2.0.0 to 10.2.0.3 allows local users with "SELECT" privileges for a base table to insert, update, or delete data by creating a crafted view then performing the operations on that view. |
| Buffer overflow in TNS Listener for Oracle 9i Database Server on Windows systems, and Oracle 8 on VM, allows local users to execute arbitrary code via a long SERVICE_NAME parameter, which is not properly handled when writing an error message to a log file. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in BEA WebLogic Portal 8.1 up to SP5 causes a JSR-168 Portlet to be retrieved from the cache for the wrong session, which might allow one user to see a Portlet of another user. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Diagnostics module 2.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to access diagnostics tests via unknown attack vectors. |
| SQL injection vulnerability in the Oracle Diagnostics module 2.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unknown attack vectors. |
| MySQL 5.0.18 allows local users with access to a VIEW to obtain sensitive information via the "SELECT * FROM information_schema.views;" query, which returns the query that created the VIEW. NOTE: this issue has been disputed by third parties, saying that the availability of the schema is a normal and sometimes desired aspect of database access |
| BEA WebLogic Portal 8.1 through SP3 stores the password for the RDBMS Authentication provider in cleartext in the config.xml file, which allows attackers to gain privileges. |
| BEA WebLogic Portal 8.1 through SP4 allows remote attackers to obtain the source for a deployment descriptor file via unknown vectors. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in BEA WebLogic Portal 8.1 SP3 through SP5, when using Web Services Remote Portlets (WSRP), allows remote attackers to access restricted web resources via crafted URLs. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle PL/SQL (PLSQL), as used in Database Server DS 9.2.0.7 and 10.1.0.5, Application Server 1.0.2.2, 9.0.4.2, 10.1.2.0.2, 10.1.2.1.0, and 10.1.3.0.0, E-Business Suite and Applications 11.5.10, and Collaboration Suite 10.1.1, 10.1.2.0, 10.1.2.1, and 9.0.4.2, allows attackers to bypass the PLSQLExclusion list and access excluded packages and procedures, aka Vuln# PLSQL01. |
| Oracle Database 8i, 9i, and 10g allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL statements in the context of the SYS user and bypass audit logging, including statements to create new privileged database accounts, via a modified AUTH_ALTER_SESSION attribute in the authentication phase of the Transparent Network Substrate (TNS) protocol. NOTE: due to the lack of relevant details from the Oracle advisory, a separate CVE is being created since it cannot be conclusively proven that this issue has been addressed by Oracle. It is possible that this is the same issue as Oracle Vuln# DB18 from the January 2006 CPU, in which case this would be subsumed by CVE-2006-0265. |
| SQL injection vulnerability in the Oracle Text component of Oracle Database 10g, and possibly earlier versions, might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unknown vectors. NOTE: due to the lack of relevant details from the Oracle advisory, a separate CVE is being created since it cannot be conclusively proven that this issue has been addressed by Oracle. It is possible that this is the same issue as Oracle Vuln# DB15 from the January 2006 CPU, in which case this would be subsumed by CVE-2006-0260. |
| Buffer overflow in an unspecified Oracle Client utility might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service. NOTE: due to the lack of relevant details from the Oracle advisory, a separate CVE is being created since it cannot be conclusively proven that this issue has been addressed by Oracle. It is possible that this is the same issue as Oracle Vuln# DBC02 from the January 2006 CPU, in which case this would be a duplicate of CVE-2006-0283. However, there are enough inconsistencies that the mapping can not be made authoritatively. |
