| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A missing access control check when linking banners or campaigns to a zone through the zone-include.php script of Revive Adserver 6.0.6 and earlier, or via its API allows a low‑privileged user could link their zones to banners or campaigns owned by other managers on the same instance, resulting in inconsistent ownership relationships. Ownership validation has been added to ensure that banners and campaigns can only be linked to zones managed by the same account. |
| A missing access control check when invoking various modify methods in the XML‑RPC API of Revive Adserver 6.0.6 and earlier. The API allowed entities to be reassigned to different parent entities, leading to inconsistent ownership relationships. This issue was exploitable only in combination with CVE‑2026‑34917 or with third‑party API extensions that expose API functionality to low‑privileged users. Access control checks have been added to validate access to parent entities in the API modify methods. |
| An access control bypass allows an advertiser‑level user to activate or deactivate a banner in Revive Adserver 6.0.6 and earlier, even when such permissions were not granted. The banner-edit.php script allowed the banner status to be overwritten solely based on banner edit permissions. The status field has been removed from the hidden form fields in the banner edit screen. |
| A missing sanitisation of user input in the zone-include.php script of Revive Adserver 6.0.6 and earlier. A low‑privileged user could exploit the clientid parameter to perform blind SQL injection attacks. Input sanitisation has been improved to ensure that all parameters processed by the script are properly validated. |
| A missing validation of user input when saving delivery limitations in Revive Adserver 6.0.6 and earlier could allow a low‑privileged user to use the logical parameter to inject malicious PHP code into the compiledlimitations field on the database and have it executed during banner delivery. Input sanitisation has been improved to ensure that the parameter is properly validated. |
| Low‑privileged session IDs generated for the web admin console could be reused in the XML‑RPC API, whose authentication is normally restricted to admin users. An attacker could leverage this to gain unauthorised access and exploit API‑level vulnerabilities. The session context (web/API) is now recorded along with other session data, preventing session IDs from being used interchangeably. |
| ImageMagick before 7.1.2-19 contains an out-of-bounds access vulnerability in ConnectedComponentsImage() when processing connected-components artifacts with invalid indices. Attackers can trigger access violations by specifying malformed connected-components definitions via CLI, causing denial of service or potential code execution. |
| An OS Command Injection vulnerability in Ivanti Sentry before the R10.5.2, R10.6.2 and R10.7.1 versions allows a remote unauthenticated user to achieve root-level remote code execution |
| InHand Networks IR912 V1.0.0.r20042 and IR915 V1.0.0.r20042 (including earlier versions) were discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability in the Python application export function. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands as root via a crafted input. |
| The Frontend File Manager Plugin WordPress plugin through 23.6 does not properly enforce its nonce check on the file download handler, allowing unauthenticated attackers to download files uploaded by any user through the Frontend File Manager Plugin WordPress plugin through 23.6 by iterating identifiers. |
| Hono before 4.12.12 does not validate cookie names on the write path in the setCookie(), serialize(), and serializeSigned() functions, allowing invalid characters such as control characters (e.g. \r or \n) when an application passes a user-controlled cookie name. This can produce malformed Set-Cookie header values. In modern runtimes such as Node.js and Cloudflare Workers, such invalid header values are rejected and cause a runtime error before the response is sent, so header injection or response splitting could not be reproduced; the issue primarily affects correctness and robustness, resulting in runtime errors (availability) rather than confirmed header injection. |
| dhcpcd through 10.3.2, fixed in commit 5733d3c, contains a heap use-after-free vulnerability that allows unauthenticated same-link attackers to crash the daemon by sending a crafted DHCPv6 RENEW reply with RFC6603 OPTION_PD_EXCLUDE and both preferred and valid lifetimes set to zero. Attackers acting as or impersonating a DHCPv6 server can trigger dhcp6_deprecatedele() to free a delegated child address while an outer TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE iterator in dhcp6_deprecateaddrs() still holds the freed pointer, causing a use-after-free when TAILQ_REMOVE is reached. |
| dhcpcd through 10.3.2, fixed in commit 2f00c7b, contains a one-byte stack out-of-bounds write vulnerability in dhcp6_makemessage() in src/dhcp6.c that allows unauthenticated same-link attackers to write beyond a fixed local buffer by serializing an oversized RFC6603 OPTION_PD_EXCLUDE option body. Attackers can send a crafted DHCPv6 ADVERTISE message containing an IA_PD IAPREFIX /0 with a valid OPTION_PD_EXCLUDE using an exclude prefix length of /121 through /128 to trigger the out-of-bounds write and potentially corrupt adjacent stack memory. |
| dhcpcd through 10.3.2, fixed in commit 708b4a5, contains a memory leak vulnerability in the IPv6 Router Advertisement route information handling that allows an unauthenticated same-link attacker to cause denial of service by sending crafted Router Advertisements. Attackers can repeatedly send Router Advertisements containing Route Information options with a lifetime of zero, triggering unfreed allocations in routeinfo_findalloc() that cause linear memory exhaustion and eventual daemon crash. |
| A stored XSS can be exploited by leveraging the usernames as an attack vector. When an admin user viewed the audit log details for affected entries, any malicious JavaScript payload embedded in the username would be executed due to missing output sanitisation. Proper escaping has been added to the audit log details output. |
| The XML‑RPC API addUser method has a validation bypass introduced in the fix for CVE‑2025‑55129. As a result, API users could create usernames that enabled impersonation or stored XSS attacks. Proper validation has been added where it was missing. |
| Low‑privileged users could use their Full Name as a vector for a stored XSS attack. The name is included in system‑generated emails, whose content is stored in the details field of the userlog table. An admin user viewing the email content through userlog-details.php would have any malicious JavaScript payload executed due to missing output sanitisation. Proper escaping has been added to the userlog details output. |
| A missing access control check when linking trackers to campaigns through the campaign-trackers.php script of Revive Adserver 6.0.6 and earlier could allow a low‑privileged user to link their trackers to campaigns owned by other managers on the same instance, resulting in inconsistent ownership relationships. Ownership validation has been added to ensure that campaigns can only be linked to trackers owned by the same advertiser. |
| GNU SASL before 2.2.4 lacks sanitization of a short challenge in _gsasl_ntlm_client_step in the NTLM client, which could result in memory disclosure via a crafted server. |
| In OpenStack Swift before 2.37.2, proxy-server does not strip internal update headers (X-Container-Host, X-Container-Device, X-Delete-At-Host, X-Delete-At-Device) from client requests before forwarding them to object-servers. An authenticated user with write access can inject these headers to redirect container update requests to an attacker-controlled server, enabling server-side request forgery. The SSRF requests expose internal cluster metadata including storage policy indexes, partition mappings, device names, and when at rest encryption is enabled, cipher text and initialization vectors for the container-level encryption key. The attacker can also cause "ghost listings" in arbitrary containers via the shard-range redirect mechanism. |
