| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in shufflehound Lemmony lemmony allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Lemmony: from n/a through < 1.7.1. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in 10Web Photo Gallery by 10Web photo-gallery allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Photo Gallery by 10Web: from n/a through <= 1.8.37. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ays Pro Quiz Maker quiz-maker allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Quiz Maker: from n/a through <= 6.7.1.2. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Magazine3 Easy Table of Contents easy-table-of-contents allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Easy Table of Contents: from n/a through <= 2.0.80. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in desertthemes Corpiva corpiva allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Corpiva: from n/a through <= 1.0.96. |
| Striae is a firearms examiner's comparison companion. A high-severity integrity bypass vulnerability existed in Striae's digital confirmation workflow prior to v3.0.0. Hash-only validation trusted manifest hash fields that could be modified together with package content, allowing tampered confirmation packages to pass integrity checks. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.0.0. |
| Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in joshuae1974 Flash Video Player allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Flash Video Player: from n/a through 5.0.4. |
| OPNsense is a FreeBSD based firewall and routing platform. Prior to 26.1.4, multiple OPNsense MVC API endpoints perform state‑changing operations but are accessible via HTTP GET requests without CSRF protection. The framework CSRF validation in ApiControllerBase only applies to POST/PUT/DELETE methods, allowing authenticated GET requests to bypass CSRF verification. As a result, a malicious website can trigger privileged backend actions when visited by an authenticated user, causing unintended service reloads and configuration changes through configd. This results in an authenticated Cross‑Site Request Forgery vulnerability allowing unauthorized system state changes. This vulnerability is fixed in 26.1.4. |
| Emlog is an open source website building system. In 2.6.6 and earlier, the delete_async action (asynchronous delete) lacks a call to LoginAuth::checkToken(), enabling CSRF attacks. |
| The LatePoint – Calendar Booking Plugin for Appointments and Events plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.2.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the reload_preview() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. An authenticated user with the view-users role could exploit a vulnerability in the UserResource component. By accessing a specific administrative endpoint, this user could improperly retrieve user attributes that were configured to be hidden. This unauthorized information disclosure could expose sensitive user data. |
| The divi-booster WordPress plugin before 5.0.2 does not have authorization and CSRF checks in one of its fixing function, allowing unauthenticated users to modify stored divi-booster WordPress plugin before 5.0.2 options. Furthermore, due to the use of unserialize() on the data, this could be further exploited when combined with a PHP gadget chain to achieve PHP Object Injection |
| The Modular DS: Monitor, update, and backup multiple websites plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the postConfirmOauth() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to disconnect the plugin's OAuth/SSO connection via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Add Custom Fields to Media plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on the field deletion functionality in the admin display template. The plugin properly validates a nonce for the 'add field' operation (line 24-36), but the 'delete field' operation (lines 38-49) processes the $_GET['delete'] parameter and calls update_option() without any nonce verification. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary custom media fields via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| In wolfSSL 5.8.2 and earlier, a logic flaw existed in the TLS 1.2 server state machine implementation. The server could incorrectly accept the CertificateVerify message before the ClientKeyExchange message had been received. This issue affects wolfSSL before 5.8.4 (wolfSSL 5.8.2 and earlier is vulnerable, 5.8.4 is not vulnerable). In 5.8.4 wolfSSL would detect the issue later in the handshake. 5.9.0 was further hardened to catch the issue earlier in the handshake. |
| A flaw was found in the github.com/containers/image library. This flaw allows attackers to trigger unexpected authenticated registry accesses on behalf of a victim user, causing resource exhaustion, local path traversal, and other attacks. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in TS Webfonts for SAKURA 3.1.2 and earlier allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of a user and to change settings by having a user view a malicious page. |
| A Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in ipa/session/login_password in all supported versions of IPA. This flaw allows an attacker to trick the user into submitting a request that could perform actions as the user, resulting in a loss of confidentiality and system integrity. During community penetration testing it was found that for certain HTTP end-points FreeIPA does not ensure CSRF protection. Due to implementation details one cannot use this flaw for reflection of a cookie representing already logged-in user. An attacker would always have to go through a new authentication attempt. |
| OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.14 contain an oauth state validation bypass vulnerability in the manual Chutes login flow that allows attackers to bypass CSRF protection. An attacker can convince a user to paste attacker-controlled OAuth callback data, enabling credential substitution and token persistence for unauthorized accounts. |
| Under specific conditions, a malicious webpage may trigger autofill population after two consecutive taps, potentially without clear or intentional user consent. This could result in disclosure of stored autofill data such as addresses, email, or phone number metadata. |
