| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| In maybeShowDialog of ControlsSettingsDialogManager.kt, there is a possible overlay of the ControlsSettingsDialog due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to trick a user into accepting a permission due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| In DefaultTransitionHandler.java, there is a possible way to unknowingly grant permissions to an app due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. |
| The web application is vulnerable to clickjacking attacks. The site can be embedded into another frame, allowing an attacker to trick a user into clicking on something different from what the user perceives, thus potentially revealing confidential information or allowing others to take control of their computer while clicking on seemingly innocuous objects. |
| The web application is vulnerable to clickjacking attacks. The site can be embedded into another frame, allowing an attacker to trick a user into clicking on something different from what the user perceives. This could potentially reveal confidential information or allow others to take control of their computer while clicking on seemingly innocuous objects. |
| Linked URLs during the creation of iFrame widgets and dashboards are vulnerable to code execution. The URLs get embedded as iFrame widgets, making it possible to attack other users that access the dashboard by including malicious code. The attack is only possible if the attacker is authorized to create new dashboards or iFrame widgets. |
| A clickjacking vulnerability exists in the web portal of Juniper Networks Paragon Automation (Pathfinder, Planner, Insights) due to the application's failure to set appropriate X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type HTTP headers. This vulnerability allows an attacker to trick users into interacting with the interface under the attacker's control.
This issue affects all versions of Paragon Automation (Pathfinder, Planner, Insights) before 24.1.1. |
| Improper management of Content Security Policy in HCL BigFix Remote Control Lite Web Portal (versions 10.1.0.0326 and lower) may allow the execution of malicious code in web pages. |
| CHOCO TEI WATCHER mini (IB-MCT001) contains an issue with improper restriction of rendered UI layers or frames. If a user clicks on content on a malicious web page while logged into the product, unintended operations may be performed on the product. |
| Inappropriate implementation in Toolbar in Google Chrome on Android prior to 143.0.7499.110 allowed a remote attacker to perform domain spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) |
| Inappropriate implementation in Downloads in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.41 allowed a local attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) |
| IBM Concert Software 1.0.0 through 2.0.0 could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. |
| Reverse Tabnabbing vulnerability in FeehiCMS 2.1.1 in the Comments Management function |
| In JetBrains YouTrack before 2025.2.86935,
2025.2.87167,
2025.3.87341,
2025.3.87344 improper iframe configuration in widget sandbox allows popups to bypass security restrictions |
| Inappropriate implementation in Compositing in Google Chrome prior to 140.0.7339.80 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) |
| Incorrect security UI in SplitView in Google Chrome prior to 142.0.7444.59 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to perform UI spoofing via a crafted domain name. (Chromium security severity: Low) |
| A flaw was found in Quay. Clickjacking is when an attacker uses multiple transparent or opaque layers to trick a user into clicking on a button or link on another page when they intend to click on the top-level page. During the pentest, it has been detected that the config-editor page is vulnerable to clickjacking. This flaw allows an attacker to trick an administrator user into clicking on buttons on the config-editor panel, possibly reconfiguring some parts of the Quay instance. |
| A crafted URL containing Arabic script and whitespace characters could have hidden the true origin of the page, resulting in a potential spoofing attack. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 133, Firefox ESR < 128.5, Thunderbird < 133, and Thunderbird < 128.5. |
| HCL DRYiCE AEX is impacted by a lack of clickjacking protection in the AEX web application. An attacker can use multiple transparent or opaque layers to trick a user into clicking on a button or link on another page than the one intended. |
| Phpgurukul Hostel Management System 2.1 is vulnerable to clickjacking. |
