Export limit exceeded: 377390 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 377390 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 377390 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 377390 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (377390 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-39821 | 1 Golang | 1 Net | 2026-08-14 | 9.6 Critical |
| The ToASCII and ToUnicode functions incorrectly accept Punycode-encoded labels that decode to an ASCII-only label. For example, ToUnicode("xn--example-.com") incorrectly returns the name "example.com" rather than an error. This behavior can lead to privilege escalation in programs using the idna package. For example, a program which performs privilege checks on the ASCII hostname may reject "example.com" but permit "xn--example-.com". If that program subsequently converts the ASCII hostname to Unicode, it will inadvertently permits access to the Unicode name "example.com". | ||||
| CVE-2026-39820 | 2 Go Standard Library, Golang | 2 Net/mail, Go | 2026-08-14 | 7.5 High |
| Well-crafted inputs reaching ParseAddress, ParseAddressList, and ParseDate were able to trigger excessive CPU exhaustion and memory allocations. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34993 | 3 Aio-libs, Aiohttp, Redhat | 3 Aiohttp, Aiohttp, Openshift Ai | 2026-08-14 | 6.4 Medium |
| AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Prior to version 3.14.0, using ``CookieJar.load()`` with untrusted input may allow arbitrary code execution. Most applications using this function will be doing so with the user's own data, so this is unlikely to affect many applications. Version 3.14.0 patches the issue. If an application does allow attacker controlled files to be loaded, a workaround on older releases would be to sanitize the files before loading. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34881 | 1 Openstack | 1 Glance | 2026-08-14 | 5 Medium |
| OpenStack Glance before 29.1.1, 30.x before 30.1.1, and 31.0.0 is affected by Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). By use of HTTP redirects, an authenticated user can bypass URL validation checks and redirect to internal services. Only glance image import functionality is affected. In particular, the web-download and glance-download import methods are subject to this vulnerability, as is the optional (not enabled by default) ovf_process image import plugin. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33811 | 2 Go Standard Library, Golang | 2 Net, Go | 2026-08-14 | 7.5 High |
| When using LookupCNAME with the cgo DNS resolver, a very long CNAME response can trigger a double-free of C memory and a crash. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33810 | 2 Go Standard Library, Golang | 2 Crypto/x509, Go | 2026-08-14 | 7.5 High |
| When verifying a certificate chain containing excluded DNS constraints, these constraints are not correctly applied to wildcard DNS SANs which use a different case than the constraint. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root CA in the VerifyOptions.Roots CertPool, or in the system certificate pool. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33186 | 1 Grpc | 2 Grpc, Grpc-go | 2026-08-14 | 9.1 Critical |
| gRPC-Go is the Go language implementation of gRPC. Versions prior to 1.79.3 have an authorization bypass resulting from improper input validation of the HTTP/2 `:path` pseudo-header. The gRPC-Go server was too lenient in its routing logic, accepting requests where the `:path` omitted the mandatory leading slash (e.g., `Service/Method` instead of `/Service/Method`). While the server successfully routed these requests to the correct handler, authorization interceptors (including the official `grpc/authz` package) evaluated the raw, non-canonical path string. Consequently, "deny" rules defined using canonical paths (starting with `/`) failed to match the incoming request, allowing it to bypass the policy if a fallback "allow" rule was present. This affects gRPC-Go servers that use path-based authorization interceptors, such as the official RBAC implementation in `google.golang.org/grpc/authz` or custom interceptors relying on `info.FullMethod` or `grpc.Method(ctx)`; AND that have a security policy contains specific "deny" rules for canonical paths but allows other requests by default (a fallback "allow" rule). The vulnerability is exploitable by an attacker who can send raw HTTP/2 frames with malformed `:path` headers directly to the gRPC server. The fix in version 1.79.3 ensures that any request with a `:path` that does not start with a leading slash is immediately rejected with a `codes.Unimplemented` error, preventing it from reaching authorization interceptors or handlers with a non-canonical path string. While upgrading is the most secure and recommended path, users can mitigate the vulnerability using one of the following methods: Use a validating interceptor (recommended mitigation); infrastructure-level normalization; and/or policy hardening. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32283 | 2 Go Standard Library, Golang | 2 Crypto Tls, Go | 2026-08-14 | 7.5 High |
| If one side of the TLS connection sends multiple key update messages post-handshake in a single record, the connection can deadlock, causing uncontrolled consumption of resources. This can lead to a denial of service. This only affects TLS 1.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32280 | 2 Go Standard Library, Golang | 2 Crypto/x509, Go | 2026-08-14 | 7.5 High |
| During chain building, the amount of work that is done is not correctly limited when a large number of intermediate certificates are passed in VerifyOptions.Intermediates, which can lead to a denial of service. This affects both direct users of crypto/x509 and users of crypto/tls. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27145 | 1 Go Standard Library | 1 Crypto/x509 | 2026-08-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| (*x509.Certificate).VerifyHostname previously called matchHostnames in a loop over all DNS Subject Alternative Name (SAN) entries. This caused strings.Split(host, ".") to execute repeatedly on the same input hostname. With a large DNS SAN list, verification costs scaled quadratically based on the number of SAN entries multiplied by the hostname's label count. Because x509.Verify validates hostnames before building the certificate chain, this overhead occurred even for untrusted certificates. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27137 | 2 Go Standard Library, Golang | 2 Crypto Tls, Go | 2026-08-14 | 7.5 High |
| When verifying a certificate chain which contains a certificate containing multiple email address constraints which share common local portions but different domain portions, these constraints will not be properly applied, and only the last constraint will be considered. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25679 | 2 Go Standard Library, Golang | 2 Net/url, Go | 2026-08-14 | 7.5 High |
| url.Parse insufficiently validated the host/authority component and accepted some invalid URLs. | ||||
| CVE-2026-24708 | 1 Openstack | 2 Compute, Nova | 2026-08-14 | 8.2 High |
| An issue was discovered in OpenStack Nova before 30.2.2, 31 before 31.2.1, and 32 before 32.1.1. By writing a malicious QCOW header to a root or ephemeral disk and then triggering a resize, a user may convince Nova's Flat image backend to call qemu-img without a format restriction, resulting in an unsafe image resize operation that could destroy data on the host system. Only compute nodes using the Flat image backend (usually configured with use_cow_images=False) are affected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-23490 | 2 Debian, Pyasn1 | 2 Debian Linux, Pyasn1 | 2026-08-14 | 7.5 High |
| pyasn1 is a generic ASN.1 library for Python. Prior to 0.6.2, a Denial-of-Service issue has been found that leads to memory exhaustion from malformed RELATIVE-OID with excessive continuation octets. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.6.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18071 | 1 Ibm | 1 I | 2026-08-14 | 7.8 High |
| IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a local attacker to gain elevated privileges due to improper privilege management. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17223 | 1 Ibm | 1 I | 2026-08-14 | 8.8 High |
| IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17206 | 1 Ibm | 1 I | 2026-08-14 | 8.1 High |
| IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17101 | 1 Ibm | 1 I | 2026-08-14 | 8.3 High |
| IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or obtain sensitive information due to improper authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17069 | 1 Ibm | 1 I | 2026-08-14 | 8.1 High |
| IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper validation of anti-CSRF tokens. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17029 | 1 Ibm | 1 I | 2026-08-14 | 8.8 High |
| IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an out-of-bounds write. | ||||