| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| DigiExam up to v14.0.2 lacks integrity checks for native modules, allowing attackers to access PII and takeover accounts on shared computers. |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Guanzhou Tozed Kangwei Intelligent Technology ZLTS10G software version S10G_3.11.6 allows attackers to takeover user accounts via sending a crafted POST request to /goform/goform_set_cmd_process. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WooCommerce WooCommerce Follow-Up Emails (AutomateWoo) plugin <= 4.9.40 versions. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Stephen Darlington, Wandle Software Limited Smart App Banner plugin <= 1.1.2 versions. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThemeinProgress WIP Custom Login plugin <= 1.2.9 versions. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Crocoblock JetFormBuilder — Dynamic Blocks Form Builder plugin <= 3.0.6 versions. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Made with Fuel Better Notifications for WP plugin <= 1.9.2 versions. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in UpdraftPlus.Com, DavidAnderson UpdraftPlus WordPress Backup Plugin <= 1.23.3 versions leads to sitewide Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in NXLog Manager 5.6.5633 version. This vulnerability allows an attacker to eliminate roles within the platform by sending a specifically crafted query to the server. The vulnerability is based on the absence of proper validation of the origin of incoming requests. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in NXLog Manager 5.6.5633 version. This vulnerability allows an attacker to manipulate and delete user accounts within the platform by sending a specifically crafted query to the server. The vulnerability is based on the lack of proper validation of the origin of incoming requests. |
| Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Archer Platform before v.6.13 and fixed in v.6.12.0.6 and v.6.13.0 allows an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted request. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in BRANDbrilliance Post State Tags plugin <= 2.0.6 versions. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Prashant Walke WP All Backup plugin <= 2.4.3 versions. |
| Dell BIOS contains a missing support for integrity check vulnerability. An attacker with physical access to the system could potentially bypass security mechanisms to run arbitrary code on the system. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Arul Prasad J Publish Confirm Message plugin <= 1.3.1 versions. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Mark Tilly MyCurator Content Curation plugin <= 3.74 versions. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in POEditor plugin <= 0.9.4 versions. |
| A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) token bypass was identified in PRTG 23.2.84.1566 and earlier versions that allows remote attackers to perform actions with the permissions of a victim user, provided the victim user has an active session and is induced to trigger the malicious request. This could force PRTG to execute different actions, such as creating new users. The severity of this vulnerability is high and received a score of 8.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H |
| An issue was discovered in systemd 253. An attacker can modify the contents of past events in a sealed log file and then adjust the file such that checking the integrity shows no error, despite modifications. NOTE: the vendor reportedly sent "a reply denying that any of the finding was a security vulnerability." |
| An issue was discovered in systemd 253. An attacker can truncate a sealed log file and then resume log sealing such that checking the integrity shows no error, despite modifications. NOTE: the vendor reportedly sent "a reply denying that any of the finding was a security vulnerability." |