Export limit exceeded: 378151 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (378151 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-66271 | 2026-08-15 | 7.2 High | ||
| Dell Wyse Management Suite (WMS), versions prior to 2605.0.2, contain an Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Remote Code Execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66270 | 2026-08-15 | 7.2 High | ||
| Dell Wyse Management Suite (WMS), versions prior to 2605.0.2, contain an Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Remote Code Execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-63700 | 2026-08-15 | 7.8 High | ||
| Dell Wyse Management Suite (WMS), versions prior to 2605.0.2, contain an Incorrect Default Permission vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Privilege Escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-53789 | 2 Rsync Project, Samba | 2 Rsync, Rsync | 2026-08-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| rsync before 3.5.0 contains an improper path handling vulnerability that allows a malicious sender to expand the scope of --delete operations beyond the intended destination subtree by sending a crafted file list that causes rsync to reclassify implied parent directory entries or treat synthetic paths as the transfer root. Attackers can exploit multiple variants including implied parent reclassification, synthetic root path construction, legacy protocol behavior below version 30, and non-directory root handling to cause the receiver to delete files outside the authorized destination directory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-53784 | 2 Rsync Project, Samba | 2 Rsync, Rsync | 2026-08-15 | 7.1 High |
| rsync before 3.5.0 contains a path traversal vulnerability that allows remote clients to access files outside the intended module root when use chroot is disabled and the module root path or a component of it is a symlink. The daemon calls chdir() to the module root at session initialization without resolving symlinks via realpath() or equivalent, causing subsequent relative-path operations to reference files relative to the symlink target rather than the intended module root, enabling unauthorized file access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-49478 | 2026-08-15 | 8.7 High | ||
| Fulcio is a certificate authority for issuing code signing certificates for an OpenID Connect (OIDC) identity. Versions through 1.8.5 improperly follow cross-host redirects and attach Kubernetes ServiceAccount tokens during OIDC discovery, allowing a malicious or compromised issuer to perform blind SSRF, substitute and cache malicious JWKS keys, or disclose ServiceAccount tokens to external hosts. Version 1.8.6 blocks cross-host redirects, restricts token injection, and restricts local token loading. No known workarounds are available. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19682 | 1 Tenable | 1 Security Center | 2026-08-15 | 9.9 Critical |
| A command injection vulnerability exists in Security Center where a remote, unauthenticated attacker could exploit this issue to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system with the privileges of the service account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19681 | 2026-08-15 | 9.9 Critical | ||
| An authenticated command injection vulnerability exists in Security Center related to file upload processing. An attacker could exploit this issue by uploading a specially crafted file, potentially resulting in arbitrary command execution on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19635 | 1 Tenable | 1 Security Center | 2026-08-15 | 8.8 High |
| A local privilege escalation vulnerability exists in Security Center. An attacker with write access to a specific configuration file could achieve arbitrary code execution with elevated privileges, without requiring further user or victim interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19629 | 1 Tenable | 1 Security Center | 2026-08-15 | 8.1 High |
| A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in Tenable Security Center that allows a user with "Security Manager" role and "manage user" permission on a single group to modify users belonging to other groups. This bypasses the intended access control restrictions and enables unauthorized cross-group user management. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19628 | 1 Tenable | 1 Security Center | 2026-08-15 | 7.2 High |
| A command injection vulnerability exists in Tenable Security Center. An authenticated administrator could modify application configuration values to achieve arbitrary command execution on the underlying operating system when specific backend operations are triggered. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19626 | 1 Tenable | 1 Security Center | 2026-08-15 | 9.9 Critical |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Tenable Security Center's report generation functionality. An authenticated, non-administrative user could exploit this issue by supplying specially crafted input that is later processed unsafely during server-side report rendering, resulting in arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the service account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8840 | 2 Wordpress, Wpdevart | 2 Wordpress, Booking Calendar, Appointment Booking System | 2026-08-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Booking calendar, Appointment Booking System plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.36. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to mark arbitrary reservations as paid or completed, cancel legitimate payments, auto-approve reservations, and trigger transactional booking emails by writing attacker-supplied payment status and transaction data directly into the payments table. The auto-approval of reservations is only triggered when the 'enable_psuccess_approval' site option is enabled, but payment status manipulation and email dispatch are exploitable regardless of that setting. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15303 | 2 Sixstorage, Wordpress | 2 6storage Rentals, Wordpress | 2026-08-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| The 6Storage Rentals plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authentication bypass in versions up to, and including, 2.27.0. This is due to the six_storage_create_wp_user() AJAX handler being registered on wp_ajax_nopriv_six_storage_create_wp_user without any nonce, capability, credential, or ownership verification, while calling wp_set_current_user() and wp_set_auth_cookie() for any WordPress user resolved by the attacker-supplied email address. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to log in as any existing WordPress user, including administrators, by submitting that user's email address. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14433 | 2 Vcita, Wordpress | 2 Online Booking & Scheduling Calendar For Wordpress By Vcita, Wordpress | 2026-08-15 | 7.2 High |
| The Online Booking & Scheduling Calendar for WordPress by vcita plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'business_id' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.6.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16145 | 2026-08-15 | 7.2 High | ||
| The Invisible Anti-Spam & CAPTCHA — reCAPTCHA Alternative for All Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'action' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 5.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. The stored payload is written by any unauthenticated admin-ajax.php request whose action value matches an entry in the plugin's explicit-actions list, which is auto-populated for common form builders at activation and requires no authentication gate to reach the save path. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16146 | 2026-08-15 | 4.9 Medium | ||
| The Invisible Anti-Spam & CAPTCHA — reCAPTCHA Alternative for All Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to generic SQL Injection via Pattern JSON Keys/Values in all versions up to, and including, 5.1 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with editor-level access and above, to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16094 | 2026-08-15 | 4.9 Medium | ||
| The Invisible Anti-Spam & CAPTCHA — reCAPTCHA Alternative for All Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to generic SQL Injection via the 'key' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 5.1 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with editor-level access and above, to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73615 | 2 Jovancoding, Network-ai | 2 Network-ai, Network-ai | 2026-08-15 | 8.8 High |
| Network-AI versions before 5.15.1 contain a security matcher bypass vulnerability where SandboxPolicy evaluates raw command strings with quotes preserved while the executor tokenizes commands by stripping quotes before execution. Attackers can craft quoted commands that evade blocklist checks and approval gates while the executor runs the identical unquoted dangerous argv. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12128 | 2026-08-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The Pinpoint Booking System – Version 2 plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Price Manipulation via the `cart_data` parameter in all versions up to, and including, 2.9.9.6.8. This is due to the `dopbsp_woocommerce_add_to_cart` AJAX action being registered via `wp_ajax_nopriv_*` with no authentication, no nonce verification, and no server-side recalculation of pricing — the `update` handler reads `price_total` directly from the attacker-controlled `cart_data` POST parameter and persists it to the database via `$wpdb->insert()` without validating it against the calendar's configured pricing. The `woocommerce_before_calculate_totals` callback subsequently reads the stored attacker-supplied value back from the database and passes it directly to `$product->set_price()` without recomputing from calendar settings. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to override the WooCommerce checkout price of any bookable product tied to a booking calendar to an arbitrary value, effectively enabling the purchase of any such product at a self-chosen price. | ||||