| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| An OS command injection vulnerability exists in AVTECH DVR, NVR, and IP camera devices within the adcommand.cgi endpoint, which interfaces with the ActionD daemon. Authenticated users can invoke the DoShellCmd operation, passing arbitrary input via the strCmd parameter. This input is executed directly by the system shell without sanitation allowing attackers to execute commands as the root user. |
| A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the web interface of AVTECH IP camera, DVR, and NVR devices. An attacker can craft malicious requests that, when executed in the context of an authenticated user’s browser session, allow unauthorized changes to the device configuration without user interaction. |
| Escalade GLPI plugin is a ticket escalation process helper for GLPI. Prior to version 2.9.11, there is an improper access control vulnerability. This can lead to data exposure and workflow disruptions. This issue has been patched in version 2.9.11. |
| tiny-secp256k1 is a tiny secp256k1 native/JS wrapper. Prior to version 1.1.7, a private key can be extracted on signing a malicious JSON-stringifiable object, when global Buffer is the buffer package. This affects only environments where require('buffer') is the NPM buffer package. The Buffer.isBuffer check can be bypassed, resulting in k reuse for different messages, leading to private key extraction over a single invalid message (and a second one for which any message/signature could be taken, e.g. previously known valid one). This issue has been patched in version 1.1.7. |
| A stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in ENS HX 10.0.4 allows a malicious user to inject arbitrary HTML into the ENS HX Malware Scan Name field, resulting in the exposure of sensitive data. |
| The Dear Flipbook – PDF Flipbook, 3D Flipbook, PDF embed, PDF viewer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to DOM-Based Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘pdf-source’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 2.3.65 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| @cyanheads/git-mcp-server is an MCP server designed to interact with Git repositories. Prior to version 2.1.5, there is a command injection vulnerability caused by the unsanitized use of input parameters within a call to child_process.exec, enabling an attacker to inject arbitrary system commands. Successful exploitation can lead to remote code execution under the server process's privileges. The server constructs and executes shell commands using unvalidated user input directly within command-line strings. This introduces the possibility of shell metacharacter injection (|, >, &&, etc.). An MCP Client can be instructed to execute additional actions for example via indirect prompt injection when asked to read git logs. This issue has been patched in version 2.1.5. |
| gluestack-ui is a library of copy-pasteable components & patterns crafted with Tailwind CSS (NativeWind). Prior to commit e6b4271, a command injection vulnerability was discovered in the discussion-to-slack.yml GitHub Actions workflow. Untrusted discussion fields (title, body, etc.) were directly interpolated into shell commands in a run: block. An attacker could craft a malicious GitHub Discussion title or body (e.g., $(curl ...)) to execute arbitrary shell commands on the Actions runner. This issue has been fixed in commit e6b4271 where the discussion-to-slack.yml workflow was removed. Users should remove the discussion-to-slack.yml workflow if using a fork or derivative of this repository. |
| RestDB's Codehooks.io MCP Server is an MCP server on the Codehooks.io platform. Prior to version 0.2.2, the MCP server is written in a way that is vulnerable to command injection attacks as part of some of its MCP Server tools definition and implementation. This could result in a user initiated remote command injection attack on a running MCP Server. This issue has been patched in version 0.2.2. |
| Insufficient validation of the screen lock mechanism in Trust Wallet v8.45 allows physically proximate attackers to bypass the lock screen and view the wallet balance. |
| linjiashop <=0.9 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. When using the default-generated JWT authentication, attackers can bypass the authentication and retrieve the encrypted "password" and "salt". The password can then be obtained through brute-force cracking. |
| tiny-secp256k1 is a tiny secp256k1 native/JS wrapper. Prior to version 1.1.7, a malicious JSON-stringifyable message can be made passing on verify(), when global Buffer is the buffer package. This affects only environments where require('buffer') is the NPM buffer package. Buffer.isBuffer check can be bypassed, resulting in strange objects being accepted as a message, and those messages could trick verify() into returning false-positive true values. This issue has been patched in version 1.1.7. |
| Improper mstatus.SUM bit retention (non-zero) in Open-Source RISC-V Processor commit f517abb violates privileged spec constraints, enabling potential physical memory access attacks. |
| A server-side request forgery vulnerability exists in multiple firmware versions of AVTECH DVR devices that exposes the /cgi-bin/nobody/Search.cgi?action=cgi_query endpoint without authentication. An attacker can manipulate the ip, port, and queryb64str parameters to make arbitrary HTTP requests from the DVR to internal or external systems, potentially exposing sensitive data or interacting with internal services. |
| An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in AVTECH IP camera, DVR, and NVR devices’ streamd web server. The strstr() function is used to identify ".cab" requests, allowing any URL containing ".cab" to bypass authentication and access protected endpoints. |
| Hikvision Streaming Media Management Server v2.3.5 uses default credentials that allow remote attackers to authenticate and access restricted functionality. After authenticating with these credentials, an attacker can exploit an arbitrary file read vulnerability in the /systemLog/downFile.php endpoint via directory traversal in the fileName parameter. This exploit chain can enable unauthorized access to sensitive system files. |
| An OS command injection vulnerability exists in AVTECH IP camera, DVR, and NVR devices via the PwdGrp.cgi endpoint, which handles user and group management operations. Authenticated users can supply input through the pwd or grp parameters, which are directly embedded into system commands without proper sanitation. This allows for the execution of arbitrary shell commands with root privileges. |
| A cloud infrastructure misconfiguration in OneLogin AD Connector results in log data being sent to a hardcoded S3 bucket (onelogin-adc-logs-production) without validating bucket ownership. An attacker who registers this unclaimed bucket can begin receiving log files from other OneLogin tenants. These logs may contain sensitive data such as directory tokens, user metadata, and environment configuration. This enables cross-tenant leakage of secrets, potentially allowing JWT signing key recovery and user impersonation. |
| A PHP objection injection vulnerability exists in the Monero Project’s Laravel-based forum software due to unsafe handling of untrusted input in the /get/image/ endpoint. The application passes a user-supplied link parameter directly to file_get_contents() without validation. MIME type checks using PHP’s finfo can be bypassed via crafted stream filter chains that prepend spoofed headers, allowing access to internal Laravel configuration files. An attacker can extract the APP_KEY from config/app.php, forge encrypted cookies, and trigger unsafe unserialize() calls, leading to reliable remote code execution. |
| A cryptographic authentication bypass vulnerability exists in OneLogin AD Connector prior to 6.1.5 due to the exposure of a tenant’s SSO JWT signing key via the /api/adc/v4/configuration endpoint. An attacker in possession of the signing key can craft valid JWT tokens impersonating arbitrary users within a OneLogin tenant. The tokens allow authentication to the OneLogin SSO portal and all downstream applications federated via SAML or OIDC. This allows full unauthorized access across the victim’s SaaS environment. |
