| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Tadaa! module before 7.x-1.4 for Drupal allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that (1) enable or (2) disable modules or (3) change variables via unspecified vectors. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Batch Jobs module before 7.x-1.2 for Drupal allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of certain users for requests that (1) delete a batch job record or (2) execute a task via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Wishlist module before 6.x-2.7 and 7.x-2.x before 7.x-2.7 for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that delete wishlist purchase intentions via unspecified vectors. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Log Watcher module before 6.x-1.2 for Drupal allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) enable, (2) disable, or (3) delete a report via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Todo Filter module before 6.x-1.1 and 7.x-1.x before 7.x-1.1 for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that toggle a task via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in EMC ViPR SRM before 3.7.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that upload files. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in FiverrScript (aka Fiverr Script) 7.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create a new admin via a request to administrator/admins_create.php. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in D-Link DAP-1360 router with firmware 2.5.4 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified users for requests that (1) change the MAC filter restrict mode, (2) add a MAC address to the filter, or (3) remove a MAC address from the filter via a crafted request to index.cgi. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in D-Link DAP-1360 with firmware 2.5.4 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified users for requests that change the (1) Enable Wireless, (2) MBSSID, (3) BSSID, (4) Hide Access Point, (5) SSID, (6) Country, (7) Channel, (8) Wireless mode, or (9) Max Associated Clients setting via a crafted request to index.cgi. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in webconfig/wlan/country.html/country in the Teracom T2-B-Gawv1.4U10Y-BI modem allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change the SSID or (2) change the password via a crafted request. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Stark CRM 1.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add (1) an administrator via a crafted request to the admin page, (2) an agent via a crafted request to the agent page, (3) a sub-agent via a crafted request to the sub_agent page, (4) a partner via a crafted request to the partner page, or (5) a client via a crafted request to the client page. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Maian Uploader 4.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified users for requests that conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the width parameter to (1) uploader/admin/js/load_flv.js.php or (2) uploader/js/load_flv.js.php. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Kanboard before 1.0.6 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add an administrative user via a save action to the default URI. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the SEO Plugin LiveOptim plugin before 1.1.4-free for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change plugin settings via unspecified vectors. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP System Management Homepage (SMH) before 7.5.0 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Disqus Comment System plugin before 2.76 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the (1) disqus_replace, (2) disqus_public_key, or (3) disqus_secret_key parameter to wp-admin/edit-comments.php in manage.php or that (4) reset or (5) delete plugin options via the reset parameter to wp-admin/edit-comments.php. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Disqus Comment System plugin 2.77 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) activate or (2) deactivate the plugin via the active parameter to wp-admin/edit-comments.php, (3) import comments via an import_comments action, or (4) export comments via an export_comments action to wp-admin/index.php. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in nps/servlet/webacc in the Administration Console server in NetIQ Access Manager (NAM) 4.x before 4.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change the administrative password via an fw.SetPassword action. |
| wp-includes/pluggable.php in WordPress before 3.9.2 does not use delimiters during concatenation of action values and uid values in CSRF tokens, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass a CSRF protection mechanism via a brute-force attack. |
| wp-includes/pluggable.php in WordPress before 3.9.2 rejects invalid CSRF nonces with a different timing depending on which characters in the nonce are incorrect, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass a CSRF protection mechanism via a brute-force attack. |
