Search Results (171 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2024-24783 1 Redhat 23 Advanced Cluster Security, Ansible Automation Platform, Ceph Storage and 20 more 2026-04-15 5.9 Medium
Verifying a certificate chain which contains a certificate with an unknown public key algorithm will cause Certificate.Verify to panic. This affects all crypto/tls clients, and servers that set Config.ClientAuth to VerifyClientCertIfGiven or RequireAndVerifyClientCert. The default behavior is for TLS servers to not verify client certificates.
CVE-2025-49520 1 Redhat 3 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer, Ansible Automation Platform Inside 2026-04-15 8.8 High
A flaw was found in Ansible Automation Platform’s EDA component where user-supplied Git URLs are passed unsanitized to the git ls-remote command. This vulnerability allows an authenticated attacker to inject arguments and execute arbitrary commands on the EDA worker. In Kubernetes/OpenShift environments, this can lead to service account token theft and cluster access.
CVE-2024-9979 1 Redhat 2 Ansible Automation Platform, Enterprise Linux 2026-04-15 5.3 Medium
A flaw was found in PyO3. This vulnerability causes a use-after-free issue, potentially leading to memory corruption or crashes via unsound borrowing from weak Python references.
CVE-2024-35195 2 Redhat, Request Project 10 Ansible Automation Platform, Discovery, Enterprise Linux and 7 more 2026-04-15 5.6 Medium
Requests is a HTTP library. Prior to 2.32.0, when making requests through a Requests `Session`, if the first request is made with `verify=False` to disable cert verification, all subsequent requests to the same host will continue to ignore cert verification regardless of changes to the value of `verify`. This behavior will continue for the lifecycle of the connection in the connection pool. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.32.0.
CVE-2025-7738 1 Redhat 2 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer 2026-04-15 4.4 Medium
A flaw was found in Ansible Automation Platform (AAP) where the Gateway API returns the client secret for certain GitHub Enterprise authenticators in clear text. This vulnerability affects administrators or auditors accessing authenticator configurations. While access is limited to privileged users, the clear text exposure of sensitive credentials increases the risk of accidental leaks or misuse.
CVE-2024-55565 1 Redhat 11 Acm, Ansible Automation Platform, Discovery and 8 more 2026-04-15 4.3 Medium
nanoid (aka Nano ID) before 5.0.9 mishandles non-integer values. 3.3.8 is also a fixed version.
CVE-2024-32879 2 Python-social-auth, Redhat 2 Social-app-django, Ansible Automation Platform 2026-04-15 4.9 Medium
Python Social Auth is a social authentication/registration mechanism. Prior to version 5.4.1, due to default case-insensitive collation in MySQL or MariaDB databases, third-party authentication user IDs are not case-sensitive and could cause different IDs to match. This issue has been addressed by a fix released in version 5.4.1. An immediate workaround would be to change collation of the affected field.
CVE-2024-21503 2 Python Software Foundation, Redhat 2 Black, Ansible Automation Platform 2026-04-15 5.3 Medium
Versions of the package black before 24.3.0 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the lines_with_leading_tabs_expanded function in the strings.py file. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting a malicious input that causes a denial of service. Exploiting this vulnerability is possible when running Black on untrusted input, or if you habitually put thousands of leading tab characters in your docstrings.
CVE-2024-8775 1 Redhat 7 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer, Ansible Automation Platform Inside and 4 more 2026-04-15 5.5 Medium
A flaw was found in Ansible, where sensitive information stored in Ansible Vault files can be exposed in plaintext during the execution of a playbook. This occurs when using tasks such as include_vars to load vaulted variables without setting the no_log: true parameter, resulting in sensitive data being printed in the playbook output or logs. This can lead to the unintentional disclosure of secrets like passwords or API keys, compromising security and potentially allowing unauthorized access or actions.
CVE-2025-5988 1 Redhat 2 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer 2026-04-15 5.3 Medium
A flaw was found in the Ansible aap-gateway. Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) origin checking is not done on requests from the gateway to external components, such as the controller, hub, and eda.
CVE-2024-6840 1 Redhat 3 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer, Ansible Automation Platform Inside 2026-04-15 6.6 Medium
An improper authorization flaw exists in the Ansible Automation Controller. This flaw allows an attacker using the k8S API server to send an HTTP request with a service account token mounted via `automountServiceAccountToken: true`, resulting in privilege escalation to a service account.
CVE-2025-9907 1 Redhat 6 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer, Ansible Automation Platform Inside and 3 more 2026-03-26 6.7 Medium
A flaw was found in the Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Event-Driven Ansible (EDA) Event Stream API. This vulnerability allows exposure of sensitive client credentials and internal infrastructure headers via the test_headers field when an event stream is in test mode. The possible outcome includes leakage of internal infrastructure details, accidental disclosure of user or system credentials, privilege escalation if high-value tokens are exposed, and persistent sensitive data exposure to all users with read access on the event stream.
CVE-2025-9908 1 Redhat 6 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer, Ansible Automation Platform Inside and 3 more 2026-03-25 6.7 Medium
A flaw was found in the Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Event-Driven Ansible (EDA) Event Streams. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to gain access to sensitive internal infrastructure headers (such as X-Trusted-Proxy and X-Envoy-*) and event stream URLs via crafted requests and job templates. By exfiltrating these headers, an attacker could spoof trusted requests, escalate privileges, or perform malicious event injection.
CVE-2025-9909 1 Redhat 6 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer, Ansible Automation Platform Inside and 3 more 2026-03-25 6.7 Medium
A flaw was found in the Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Gateway route creation component. This vulnerability allows credential theft via the creation of misleading routes using a double-slash (//) prefix in the gateway_path. A malicious or socially engineered administrator can configure a honey-pot route to intercept and exfiltrate user credentials, potentially maintaining persistent access or creating a backdoor even after their permissions are revoked.
CVE-2023-50782 3 Couchbase, Cryptography.io, Redhat 7 Couchbase Server, Cryptography, Ansible Automation Platform and 4 more 2026-03-24 7.5 High
A flaw was found in the python-cryptography package. This issue may allow a remote attacker to decrypt captured messages in TLS servers that use RSA key exchanges, which may lead to exposure of confidential or sensitive data.
CVE-2023-6681 3 Fedoraproject, Latchset, Redhat 7 Fedora, Jwcrypto, Ansible Automation Platform and 4 more 2026-02-26 5.3 Medium
A vulnerability was found in JWCrypto. This flaw allows an attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) attack and possible password brute-force and dictionary attacks to be more resource-intensive. This issue can result in a large amount of computational consumption, causing a denial of service attack.
CVE-2025-27516 3 Debian, Palletsprojects, Redhat 11 Debian Linux, Jinja, Ansible Automation Platform and 8 more 2026-02-26 8.8 High
Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.
CVE-2023-4237 1 Redhat 3 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Cloud Billing, Ansible Collection 2026-02-25 7.3 High
A flaw was found in the Ansible Automation Platform. When creating a new keypair, the ec2_key module prints out the private key directly to the standard output. This flaw allows an attacker to fetch those keys from the log files, compromising the system's confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
CVE-2024-23334 3 Aiohttp, Fedoraproject, Redhat 6 Aiohttp, Fedora, Ansible Automation Platform and 3 more 2026-02-04 5.9 Medium
aiohttp is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. When using aiohttp as a web server and configuring static routes, it is necessary to specify the root path for static files. Additionally, the option 'follow_symlinks' can be used to determine whether to follow symbolic links outside the static root directory. When 'follow_symlinks' is set to True, there is no validation to check if reading a file is within the root directory. This can lead to directory traversal vulnerabilities, resulting in unauthorized access to arbitrary files on the system, even when symlinks are not present. Disabling follow_symlinks and using a reverse proxy are encouraged mitigations. Version 3.9.2 fixes this issue.
CVE-2024-37891 4 Debian, Netapp, Python and 1 more 13 Debian Linux, Active Iq Unified Manager, Urllib3 and 10 more 2026-01-06 4.4 Medium
urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. When using urllib3's proxy support with `ProxyManager`, the `Proxy-Authorization` header is only sent to the configured proxy, as expected. However, when sending HTTP requests *without* using urllib3's proxy support, it's possible to accidentally configure the `Proxy-Authorization` header even though it won't have any effect as the request is not using a forwarding proxy or a tunneling proxy. In those cases, urllib3 doesn't treat the `Proxy-Authorization` HTTP header as one carrying authentication material and thus doesn't strip the header on cross-origin redirects. Because this is a highly unlikely scenario, we believe the severity of this vulnerability is low for almost all users. Out of an abundance of caution urllib3 will automatically strip the `Proxy-Authorization` header during cross-origin redirects to avoid the small chance that users are doing this on accident. Users should use urllib3's proxy support or disable automatic redirects to achieve safe processing of the `Proxy-Authorization` header, but we still decided to strip the header by default in order to further protect users who aren't using the correct approach. We believe the number of usages affected by this advisory is low. It requires all of the following to be true to be exploited: 1. Setting the `Proxy-Authorization` header without using urllib3's built-in proxy support. 2. Not disabling HTTP redirects. 3. Either not using an HTTPS origin server or for the proxy or target origin to redirect to a malicious origin. Users are advised to update to either version 1.26.19 or version 2.2.2. Users unable to upgrade may use the `Proxy-Authorization` header with urllib3's `ProxyManager`, disable HTTP redirects using `redirects=False` when sending requests, or not user the `Proxy-Authorization` header as mitigations.