Export limit exceeded: 360862 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (360862 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-45778 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 5 Grub2, Enterprise Linux, Openshift and 2 more | 2026-06-25 | 4.1 Medium |
| A stack overflow flaw was found when reading a BFS file system. A crafted BFS filesystem may lead to an uncontrolled loop, causing grub2 to crash. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45777 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 4 Grub2, Enterprise Linux, Openshift and 1 more | 2026-06-25 | 6.7 Medium |
| A flaw was found in grub2. The calculation of the translation buffer when reading a language .mo file in grub_gettext_getstr_from_position() may overflow, leading to a Out-of-bound write. This issue can be leveraged by an attacker to overwrite grub2's sensitive heap data, eventually leading to the circumvention of secure boot protections. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45776 | 1 Redhat | 3 Enterprise Linux, Openshift, Rhivos | 2026-06-25 | 6.7 Medium |
| When reading the language .mo file in grub_mofile_open(), grub2 fails to verify an integer overflow when allocating its internal buffer. A crafted .mo file may lead the buffer size calculation to overflow, leading to out-of-bound reads and writes. This flaw allows an attacker to leak sensitive data or overwrite critical data, possibly circumventing secure boot protections. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45774 | 1 Redhat | 3 Enterprise Linux, Openshift, Rhivos | 2026-06-25 | 6.7 Medium |
| A flaw was found in grub2. A specially crafted JPEG file can cause the JPEG parser of grub2 to incorrectly check the bounds of its internal buffers, resulting in an out-of-bounds write. The possibility of overwriting sensitive information to bypass secure boot protections is not discarded. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12747 | 1 Redhat | 4 Discovery, Enterprise Linux, Openshift and 1 more | 2026-06-25 | 5.6 Medium |
| A flaw was found in rsync. This vulnerability arises from a race condition during rsync's handling of symbolic links. Rsync's default behavior when encountering symbolic links is to skip them. If an attacker replaced a regular file with a symbolic link at the right time, it was possible to bypass the default behavior and traverse symbolic links. Depending on the privileges of the rsync process, an attacker could leak sensitive information, potentially leading to privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12088 | 8 Almalinux, Archlinux, Gentoo and 5 more | 22 Almalinux, Arch Linux, Linux and 19 more | 2026-06-25 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in rsync. When using the `--safe-links` option, the rsync client fails to properly verify if a symbolic link destination sent from the server contains another symbolic link within it. This results in a path traversal vulnerability, which may lead to arbitrary file write outside the desired directory. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12087 | 8 Almalinux, Archlinux, Gentoo and 5 more | 27 Almalinux, Arch Linux, Linux and 24 more | 2026-06-25 | 6.5 Medium |
| A path traversal vulnerability exists in rsync. It stems from behavior enabled by the `--inc-recursive` option, a default-enabled option for many client options and can be enabled by the server even if not explicitly enabled by the client. When using the `--inc-recursive` option, a lack of proper symlink verification coupled with deduplication checks occurring on a per-file-list basis could allow a server to write files outside of the client's intended destination directory. A malicious server could write malicious files to arbitrary locations named after valid directories/paths on the client. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12086 | 8 Almalinux, Archlinux, Gentoo and 5 more | 13 Almalinux, Arch Linux, Linux and 10 more | 2026-06-25 | 6.1 Medium |
| A flaw was found in rsync. It could allow a server to enumerate the contents of an arbitrary file from the client's machine. This issue occurs when files are being copied from a client to a server. During this process, the rsync server will send checksums of local data to the client to compare with in order to determine what data needs to be sent to the server. By sending specially constructed checksum values for arbitrary files, an attacker may be able to reconstruct the data of those files byte-by-byte based on the responses from the client. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11831 | 1 Redhat | 35 Acm, Advanced Cluster Security, Ansible Automation Platform and 32 more | 2026-06-25 | 5.4 Medium |
| A flaw was found in npm-serialize-javascript. The vulnerability occurs because the serialize-javascript module does not properly sanitize certain inputs, such as regex or other JavaScript object types, allowing an attacker to inject malicious code. This code could be executed when deserialized by a web browser, causing Cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks. This issue is critical in environments where serialized data is sent to web clients, potentially compromising the security of the website or web application using this package. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11079 | 1 Redhat | 7 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer, Ansible Automation Platform Inside and 4 more | 2026-06-25 | 5.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Ansible-Core. This vulnerability allows attackers to bypass unsafe content protections using the hostvars object to reference and execute templated content. This issue can lead to arbitrary code execution if remote data or module outputs are improperly templated within playbooks. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10306 | 1 Redhat | 4 Enterprise Linux, Jboss Core Services, Rhel Eus and 1 more | 2026-06-25 | 5.4 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in mod_proxy_cluster. The issue is that the <Directory> directive should be replaced by the <Location> directive as the former does not restrict IP/host access as `Require ip IP_ADDRESS` would suggest. This means that anyone with access to the host might send MCMP requests that may result in adding/removing/updating nodes for the balancing. However, this host should not be accessible to the public network as it does not serve the general traffic. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10041 | 2 Linux-pam, Redhat | 4 Linux-pam, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Eus and 1 more | 2026-06-25 | 4.7 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in PAM. The secret information is stored in memory, where the attacker can trigger the victim program to execute by sending characters to its standard input (stdin). As this occurs, the attacker can train the branch predictor to execute an ROP chain speculatively. This flaw could result in leaked passwords, such as those found in /etc/shadow while performing authentications. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32990 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 11 Gnutls, Ceph Storage, Discovery and 8 more | 2026-06-25 | 6.5 Medium |
| A heap-buffer-overflow (off-by-one) flaw was found in the GnuTLS software in the template parsing logic within the certtool utility. When it reads certain settings from a template file, it allows an attacker to cause an out-of-bounds (OOB) NULL pointer write, resulting in memory corruption and a denial-of-service (DoS) that could potentially crash the system. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32989 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 11 Gnutls, Ceph Storage, Discovery and 8 more | 2026-06-25 | 5.3 Medium |
| A heap-buffer-overread vulnerability was found in GnuTLS in how it handles the Certificate Transparency (CT) Signed Certificate Timestamp (SCT) extension during X.509 certificate parsing. This flaw allows a malicious user to create a certificate containing a malformed SCT extension (OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.11129.2.4.2) that contains sensitive data. This issue leads to the exposure of confidential information when GnuTLS verifies certificates from certain websites when the certificate (SCT) is not checked correctly. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32988 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 11 Gnutls, Ceph Storage, Discovery and 8 more | 2026-06-25 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in GnuTLS. A double-free vulnerability exists in GnuTLS due to incorrect ownership handling in the export logic of Subject Alternative Name (SAN) entries containing an otherName. If the type-id OID is invalid or malformed, GnuTLS will call asn1_delete_structure() on an ASN.1 node it does not own, leading to a double-free condition when the parent function or caller later attempts to free the same structure. This vulnerability can be triggered using only public GnuTLS APIs and may result in denial of service or memory corruption, depending on allocator behavior. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32914 | 1 Redhat | 7 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus, Rhel E4s and 4 more | 2026-06-25 | 7.4 High |
| A flaw was found in libsoup, where the soup_multipart_new_from_message() function is vulnerable to an out-of-bounds read. This flaw allows a malicious HTTP client to induce the libsoup server to read out of bounds. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32912 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Rhivos | 2026-06-25 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in libsoup, where SoupAuthDigest is vulnerable to a NULL pointer dereference. The HTTP server may cause the libsoup client to crash. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32910 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Rhivos | 2026-06-25 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in libsoup, where soup_auth_digest_authenticate() is vulnerable to a NULL pointer dereference. This issue may cause the libsoup client to crash. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32909 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Rhivos | 2026-06-25 | 5.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in libsoup. SoupContentSniffer may be vulnerable to a NULL pointer dereference in the sniff_mp4 function. The HTTP server may cause the libsoup client to crash. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32907 | 1 Redhat | 4 Enterprise Linux, Rhel E4s, Rhel Eus and 1 more | 2026-06-25 | 5.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in libsoup. The implementation of HTTP range requests is vulnerable to a resource consumption attack. This flaw allows a malicious client to request the same range many times in a single HTTP request, causing the server to use large amounts of memory. This does not allow for a full denial of service. | ||||