| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| IBM WebSphere Message Broker 6.1 before 6.1.0.12, 7.0 before 7.0.0.6, and 8.0 before 8.0.0.2 does not validate Basic Authentication credentials before proceeding to WS-Addressing and WS-Security operations, which allows remote attackers to trigger transmission of unauthenticated messages via unspecified vectors. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 2.x and 3.x before 3.3, and 8, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that modify data records via vectors involving (1) the html/en/default/ directory or (2) sqa/html/en/default/process/comm/saveProps.jsp. |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 2.x and 3.x before 3.3, and 8, allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors involving (1) WebProcess.srv, (2) the html/en/default/ directory, (3) Widget/resource, (4) birt/frameset, or (5) ganttlib/gantt-jws.jnlp. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM iNotes 8.5.x before 8.5.3 FP4 allows user-assisted remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors involving mail, aka SPR JDOE8ZZS9. |
| The com.ibm.CORBA.iiop.ClientDelegate class in IBM Java 1.4.2 before 1.4.2 SR13-FP18, 5.0 before 5.0 SR16-FP3, 6 before 6 SR14, 6.0.1 before 6.0.1 SR6, and 7 before 7 SR5 improperly exposes the invoke method of the java.lang.reflect.Method class, which allows remote attackers to call setSecurityManager and bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors related to the AccessController doPrivileged block. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM Rational ClearQuest 7.1.x before 7.1.2.7 and 8.x before 8.0.0.3 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a workspace query. |
| IBM Global Security Kit (aka GSKit) before 8.0.14.22, as used in IBM Rational Directory Server, IBM Tivoli Directory Server, and other products, uses the PKCS #12 file format for certificate objects without enforcing file integrity, which makes it easier for remote attackers to spoof SSL servers via vectors involving insertion of an arbitrary root Certification Authority (CA) certificate. |
| IBM DB2 9.1 before FP12, 9.5 through FP9, 9.7 through FP6, 9.8 through FP5, and 10.1 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary XML files via the (1) GET_WRAP_CFG_C or (2) GET_WRAP_CFG_C2 stored procedure. |
| IBM Remote Supervisor Adapter II firmware for System x3650, x3850 M2, and x3950 M2 1.13 and earlier generates weak RSA keys, which makes it easier for attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms via unspecified vectors. |
| Session fixation vulnerability in IBM Maximo Asset Management 6.2 through 7.5, as used in SmartCloud Control Desk, Tivoli Asset Management for IT, Tivoli Service Request Manager, Maximo Service Desk, and Change and Configuration Management Database (CCMDB), allows remote attackers to hijack web sessions via unspecified vectors. |
| The Web Server Plug-in in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 8.0 and earlier uses unencrypted HTTP communication after expiration of the plugin-key.kdb password, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by sniffing the network, or spoof arbitrary servers via a man-in-the-middle attack. |
| InfoSphere Metadata Workbench (MWB) 8.1 through 8.7 in IBM InfoSphere Information Server 8.1, 8.5 before FP3, and 8.7 does not properly restrict use of the troubleshooting feature, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions or cause a denial of service (workbench outage) via unspecified vectors. |
| Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in tm1admsd.exe in the Admin Server in IBM Cognos TM1 9.4.x and 9.5.x before 9.5.2 FP2 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via crafted data. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Start Center Layout and Configuration component in IBM Maximo Asset Management and Asset Management Essentials 6.2, 7.1, and 7.5; IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT 6.2, 7.1, and 7.2; IBM Tivoli Service Request Manager 7.1 and 7.2; IBM Maximo Service Desk 6.2; and IBM Tivoli Change and Configuration Management Database (CCMDB) 6.2, 7.1, and 7.2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the display name. |
| IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 6.0 through 6.0.2.43, 6.1 before 6.1.0.43, 7.0 before 7.0.0.23, and 8.0 before 8.0.0.3 computes hash values for form parameters without restricting the ability to trigger hash collisions predictably, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by sending many crafted parameters. |
| The (1) webreports, (2) post/create-role, and (3) post/update-role programs in IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager (TEM) before 8.2 do not include the HTTPOnly flag in a Set-Cookie header for a cookie, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain potentially sensitive information via script access to this cookie. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in IBM Tivoli Monitoring Agent (ITMA), as used in IBM DB2 9.5 before FP9 on UNIX, allows local users to gain privileges via unknown vectors. |
| The SibRaRecoverableSiXaResource class in the Default Messaging Component in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 6.1 before 6.1.0.41 does not properly handle a Service Integration Bus (SIB) dump operation involving the First Failure Data Capture (FFDC) introspection code, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading the FFDC log file. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 6.1 before 6.1.0.41 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors related to web messaging. |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in IBM Web Experience Factory (aka WEF, formerly WebSphere Portlet Factory) 7.0 and 7.0.1 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a (1) text INPUT element or (2) TEXTAREA element, related to an interaction between Smart Refresh and Dojo. |
