Export limit exceeded: 361169 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (586 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-12906 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2025-11-21 | 5.4 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in Permissions in Google Chrome prior to 140.0.7339.80 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2025-12909 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2025-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| Insufficient policy enforcement in Devtools in Google Chrome prior to 140.0.7339.80 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via Devtools. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2023-5557 | 2 Gnome, Redhat | 6 Tracker Miners, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus and 3 more | 2025-11-20 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in the tracker-miners package. A weakness in the sandbox allows a maliciously-crafted file to execute code outside the sandbox if the tracker-extract process has first been compromised by a separate vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10157 | 1 Mmaitre314 | 1 Picklescan | 2025-11-13 | 7.8 High |
| A Protection Mechanism Failure vulnerability in mmaitre314 picklescan versions up to and including 0.0.30 allows a remote attacker to bypass the unsafe globals check. This is possible because the scanner performs an exact match for module names, allowing malicious payloads to be loaded via submodules of dangerous packages (e.g., 'asyncio.unix_events' instead of 'asyncio'). When the incorrectly considered safe file is loaded after scan, it can lead to the execution of malicious code. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12554 | 2 Azure-access, Azure Access Technology | 6 Blu-ic2, Blu-ic2 Firmware, Blu-ic4 and 3 more | 2025-11-10 | 9.8 Critical |
| Missing Security Headers.This issue affects BLU-IC2: through 1.19.5; BLU-IC4: through 1.19.5. | ||||
| CVE-2024-20923 | 1 Oracle | 3 Graalvm, Jdk, Jre | 2025-11-04 | 3.1 Low |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition product of Oracle Java SE (component: JavaFX). Supported versions that are affected are Oracle Java SE: 8u391; Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition: 20.3.12 and 21.3.8. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition accessible data. Note: This vulnerability applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. This vulnerability does not apply to Java deployments, typically in servers, that load and run only trusted code (e.g., code installed by an administrator). CVSS 3.1 Base Score 3.1 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2024-20926 | 4 Debian, Netapp, Oracle and 1 more | 15 Debian Linux, Cloud Insights Acquisition Unit, Cloud Insights Storage Workload Security Agent and 12 more | 2025-11-03 | 5.9 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition product of Oracle Java SE (component: Scripting). Supported versions that are affected are Oracle Java SE: 8u391, 8u391-perf, 11.0.21; Oracle GraalVM for JDK: 17.0.9; Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition: 20.3.12, 21.3.8 and 22.3.4. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition accessible data. Note: This vulnerability can be exploited by using APIs in the specified Component, e.g., through a web service which supplies data to the APIs. This vulnerability also applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.9 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2024-57931 | 2 Linux, Redhat | 2 Linux Kernel, Enterprise Linux | 2025-11-03 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: selinux: ignore unknown extended permissions When evaluating extended permissions, ignore unknown permissions instead of calling BUG(). This commit ensures that future permissions can be added without interfering with older kernels. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56326 | 2 Palletsprojects, Redhat | 15 Jinja, Ansible Automation Platform, Discovery and 12 more | 2025-11-03 | 7.8 High |
| Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Prior to 3.1.5, An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.5. | ||||
| CVE-2022-39957 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Owasp | 3 Debian Linux, Fedora, Owasp Modsecurity Core Rule Set | 2025-11-03 | 7.3 High |
| The OWASP ModSecurity Core Rule Set (CRS) is affected by a response body bypass. A client can issue an HTTP Accept header field containing an optional "charset" parameter in order to receive the response in an encoded form. Depending on the "charset", this response can not be decoded by the web application firewall. A restricted resource, access to which would ordinarily be detected, may therefore bypass detection. The legacy CRS versions 3.0.x and 3.1.x are affected, as well as the currently supported versions 3.2.1 and 3.3.2. Integrators and users are advised to upgrade to 3.2.2 and 3.3.3 respectively. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39599 | 1 Sap | 1 Sap Basis | 2025-10-28 | 4.7 Medium |
| Due to a Protection Mechanism Failure in SAP NetWeaver Application Server for ABAP and ABAP Platform, a developer can bypass the configured malware scanner API because of a programming error. This leads to a low impact on the application's confidentiality, integrity, and availability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38226 | 1 Microsoft | 4 Office, Office 2019, Office Long Term Servicing Channel and 1 more | 2025-10-28 | 7.3 High |
| Microsoft Publisher Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-21412 | 1 Microsoft | 15 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 21h2 and 12 more | 2025-10-28 | 8.1 High |
| Internet Shortcut Files Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-29988 | 1 Microsoft | 15 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 21h2 and 12 more | 2025-10-28 | 8.8 High |
| SmartScreen Prompt Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-38213 | 1 Microsoft | 20 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 17 more | 2025-10-28 | 6.5 Medium |
| Windows Mark of the Web Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-38217 | 1 Microsoft | 25 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 22 more | 2025-10-28 | 5.4 Medium |
| Windows Mark of the Web Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2019-1003030 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 3 Pipeline\, Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2025-10-24 | 9.9 Critical |
| A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Jenkins Pipeline: Groovy Plugin 2.63 and earlier in pom.xml, src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/workflow/cps/CpsGroovyShell.java that allows attackers able to control pipeline scripts to execute arbitrary code on the Jenkins master JVM. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0277 | 1 Hcltech | 2 Bigfix Mobile, Bigfix Modern Client Management | 2025-10-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| HCL BigFix Mobile 3.3 and earlier are vulnerable to certain insecure directives within the Content Security Policy (CSP). An attacker could trick users into performing actions by not properly restricting the sources of scripts and other content. | ||||
| CVE-2025-52615 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Unica | 2025-10-21 | 3.5 Low |
| HCL Unica Platform is impacted by misconfigured security related HTTP headers. This can lead to less secure browser default treatment for the policies controlled by these headers. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0276 | 1 Hcltech | 2 Bigfix Mobile, Bigfix Modern Client Management | 2025-10-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| HCL BigFix Modern Client Management (MCM) 3.3 and earlier are vulnerable to certain insecure directives within the Content Security Policy (CSP). An attacker could trick users into performing actions by not properly restricting the sources of scripts and other content. | ||||