Export limit exceeded: 342065 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (9673 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-12401 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-11-04 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Label Plugins plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the label_plugins_options() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12069 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-11-04 | 4.3 Medium |
| The WP Global Screen Options plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.2. This is due to missing nonce validation on the `updatewpglobalscreenoptions` action handler. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify global screen options for all users via a forged request granted they can trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3596 | 5 Broadcom, Freeradius, Ietf and 2 more | 12 Brocade Sannav, Fabric Operating System, Freeradius and 9 more | 2025-11-04 | 9 Critical |
| RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response (Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge) to any other response using a chosen-prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature. | ||||
| CVE-2024-34502 | 2 Fedoraproject, Mediawiki | 2 Fedora, Mediawiki | 2025-11-04 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in WikibaseLexeme in MediaWiki before 1.39.6, 1.40.x before 1.40.2, and 1.41.x before 1.41.1. Loading Special:MergeLexemes will (attempt to) make an edit that merges the from-id to the to-id, even if the request was not a POST request, and even if it does not contain an edit token. | ||||
| CVE-2023-47677 | 3 Level1, Level One, Realtek | 5 Wbr-6013, Wbr-6013 Firmware, Wbr6013 and 2 more | 2025-11-04 | 8.8 High |
| A cross-site request forgery (csrf) vulnerability exists in the boa CSRF protection functionality of Realtek rtl819x Jungle SDK v3.4.11. A specially crafted network request can lead to CSRF. An attacker can send an HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2020-11919 | 1 Svakom | 2 Svakom Siime Eye, Svakom Siime Eye Firmware | 2025-11-04 | 8 High |
| An issue was discovered in Siime Eye 14.1.00000001.3.330.0.0.3.14. There is no CSRF protection. | ||||
| CVE-2019-20460 | 1 Epson | 1 Xp-255 | 2025-11-04 | 8.8 High |
| An issue was discovered on Epson Expression Home XP255 20.08.FM10I8 devices. POST requests don't require (anti-)CSRF tokens or other mechanisms for validating that the request is from a legitimate source. In addition, CSRF attacks can be used to send text directly to the RAW printer interface. For example, an attack could deliver a worrisome printout to an end user. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12400 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-11-04 | 6.1 Medium |
| The LMB^Box Smileys plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the manage_page() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12456 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-11-04 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Centangle-Team plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Additionally, due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on cai_name_color parameter, this issue allows to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages, that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12415 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-11-04 | 6.1 Medium |
| The MapMap plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the admin_shortcode_submit, admin_configuration_submit, and admin_shortcode_delete functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12403 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-11-04 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Associados Amazon Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.8. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the brzon_admin_panel() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12452 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-11-04 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Visit Counter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in version 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the widgets.php page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12402 | 2 Bondnono, Wordpress | 2 Linkedin Resume, Wordpress | 2025-11-04 | 6.1 Medium |
| The LinkedIn Resume plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.00. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the linkedinresume_printAdminPage() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8036 | 1 Mozilla | 3 Firefox, Firefox Esr, Thunderbird | 2025-11-04 | 8.1 High |
| Thunderbird cached CORS preflight responses across IP address changes. This allowed circumventing CORS with DNS rebinding. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 141, Firefox ESR < 140.1, Thunderbird < 141, and Thunderbird < 140.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-56009 | 1 Keenetic | 1 Keeneticos | 2025-11-04 | 5.3 Medium |
| Cross site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in KeeneticOS before 4.3 at "/rci" API endpoint allows attackers to take over the device via adding additional users with full permissions by managing the victim to open page with exploit. | ||||
| CVE-2023-45721 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Domino Leap | 2025-11-04 | 5.3 Medium |
| Insufficient default configuration in HCL Leap allows anonymous access to directory information. | ||||
| CVE-2024-28141 | 2025-11-03 | 6.3 Medium | ||
| The web application is not protected against cross-site request forgery attacks. Therefore, an attacker can trick users into performing actions on the application when they visit an attacker-controlled website or click on a malicious link. E.g. an attacker can forge malicious links to reset the admin password or create new users. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11697 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 9 Firefox, Firefox Esr, Thunderbird and 6 more | 2025-11-03 | 8.8 High |
| When handling keypress events, an attacker may have been able to trick a user into bypassing the "Open Executable File?" confirmation dialog. This could have led to malicious code execution. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 133, Firefox ESR < 128.5, Thunderbird < 133, and Thunderbird < 128.5. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11696 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 9 Firefox, Firefox Esr, Thunderbird and 6 more | 2025-11-03 | 5.4 Medium |
| The application failed to account for exceptions thrown by the `loadManifestFromFile` method during add-on signature verification. This flaw, triggered by an invalid or unsupported extension manifest, could have caused runtime errors that disrupted the signature validation process. As a result, the enforcement of signature validation for unrelated add-ons may have been bypassed. Signature validation in this context is used to ensure that third-party applications on the user's computer have not tampered with the user's extensions, limiting the impact of this issue. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 133, Firefox ESR < 128.5, Thunderbird < 133, and Thunderbird < 128.5. | ||||
| CVE-2023-38552 | 3 Fedoraproject, Nodejs, Redhat | 3 Fedora, Node.js, Enterprise Linux | 2025-11-03 | 7.5 High |
| When the Node.js policy feature checks the integrity of a resource against a trusted manifest, the application can intercept the operation and return a forged checksum to the node's policy implementation, thus effectively disabling the integrity check. Impacts: This vulnerability affects all users using the experimental policy mechanism in all active release lines: 18.x and, 20.x. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the policy mechanism is an experimental feature of Node.js. | ||||