Export limit exceeded: 376567 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (376567 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-66809 | 1 Microsoft | 8 365 Apps, Office 2019, Office 2021 and 5 more | 2026-08-11 | 5.5 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65778 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Windows 11 24h2, Windows 11 25h2 | 2026-08-11 | 7 High |
| Use after free in Windows Autopilot allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73089 | 2026-08-11 | 7.5 High | ||
| Browserslist is a configuration tool for sharing target browsers and Node.js versions between front-end tools. Prior to 4.28.7, index.js retains every distinct `(queries, context)` result in cache and every parseQueries() AST in parseCache without a size cap, TTL, or eviction, allowing an attacker who can influence repeated browserslist() query values, including valid since `<year>-<month>-<day>` queries, to bypass the caller-controlled BROWSERSLIST_DISABLE_CACHE mitigation and cause linear memory growth followed by an out-of-memory process crash. This issue is fixed in version 4.28.7. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56022 | 1 Webmin | 1 Webmin | 2026-08-11 | 5.3 Medium |
| Webmin accepts basic authentication without session cookies when an attacker provides the 'User-Agent: webmin' header, allowing bypass of additional MFA requirements. Fixed in 2.640. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62703 | 1 Microsoft | 10 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 22h2 and 7 more | 2026-08-11 | 5.5 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in Windows DWM Core Library allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61350 | 1 Microsoft | 14 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 11 more | 2026-08-11 | 4.6 Medium |
| Buffer over-read in Windows NTFS allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information with a physical attack. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72535 | 1 Chaskiq | 1 Chaskiq | 2026-08-11 | 8.2 High |
| A missing authentication vulnerability in Chaskiq through commit 46dfdd1 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to mint Stripe Billing Portal sessions for any tenant via the stripeCustomerPortal GraphQL mutation. The mutation performs no authentication or authorization checks before creating a customer portal session linked to any tenant Stripe account. An attacker can access and manage subscription data for any tenant without credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72536 | 1 Chaskiq | 1 Chaskiq | 2026-08-11 | 8.2 High |
| A missing authentication vulnerability in Chaskiq through commit 46dfdd1 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to manipulate any tenant Stripe subscription via the stripeCreateIntent GraphQL mutation. The mutation lacks authentication and authorization checks, exposing Stripe payment intent creation to unauthenticated callers. An attacker can create payment intents and alter billing for any tenant without credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72607 | 1 Koha-community | 1 Koha | 2026-08-11 | 7.1 High |
| A stored SQL injection vulnerability in Koha through 24.11.17, 25.05.12, 25.11.06, and 26.05.01 allows authenticated staff with the tools => items_batchmod permission to read arbitrary database contents by storing a SQL payload in the agefield value of an automatic item modification rule. The agefield value is stored verbatim to the system preference and later interpolated without parameterization into a SQL query in C4::Items::ToggleNewStatus (line 1228) when the scheduled cron job executes. The injection is SELECT-only under standard MariaDB/MySQL DBI single-statement execution; a time-based SLEEP payload is also achievable via the cron trigger. An attacker can read the entire Koha database including patron PII and staff bcrypt password hashes. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72608 | 1 Koha-community | 1 Koha | 2026-08-11 | 6.5 Medium |
| A stored SQL injection vulnerability in Koha through 24.11.17, 25.05.12, 25.11.06, and 26.05.01 allows authenticated staff with the tools => label_creator permission to execute arbitrary SQL via the image_name field of a patron card layout. The image_name value is stored verbatim in the layout XML and later concatenated raw into a SQL query in patroncards/create-pdf.pl when a patron card batch is printed. An attacker can read the entire Koha database including patron PII and staff bcrypt password hashes via error-based or time-based blind injection. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73088 | 2026-08-11 | 7.5 High | ||
| Browserslist is a configuration tool for sharing target browsers and Node.js versions between front-end tools. Prior to 4.28.7, normalizeStats() in node.js, reached unconditionally through getStat() and loadStat() on every browserslist() call, processes untrusted browserslist-stats.json, opts.stats, and CLI --stats data with an unguarded for...in loop and plain-object bracket access and assignment, allowing inherited Object.prototype keys including __proto__, toString, valueOf, constructor, hasOwnProperty, and isPrototypeOf to cause an uncaught TypeError or modify the prototype of the returned normalized object. This issue is fixed in version 4.28.7. | ||||
| CVE-2026-50236 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2026-08-11 | 7.4 High |
| An authenticated SSRF flaw was found in the OpenShift Console Dev Console webhook helpers. User-supplied target URLs are fetched server-side without validation, with path neutralization enabling arbitrary endpoint targeting and full response reflection from the console pod's privileged network position. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51536 | 2 Eipstackgroup, Opener Project | 2 Opener, Opener | 2026-08-11 | 9.1 Critical |
| In OpENer 2.3.0 (commit 76b95cf) when parsing incoming CIP (Common Industrial Protocol) network packets, the length parameter is inconsistently typed across the call stack. Specifically, an upstream length calculated as an int is passed to a downstream function that expects an EipInt16 (a 16-bit signed integer). If a maliciously crafted packet with specific length fields is processed, the length parameter can overflow or be truncated into a negative value. This negative length bypasses subsequent bounds checking (due to signed/unsigned comparison issues) and is ultimately used in memory operations, leading to a Stack Buffer Overflow when reading data in DecodePaddedEPath. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51537 | 2 Eipstackgroup, Opener Project | 2 Opener, Opener | 2026-08-11 | 9.1 Critical |
| EIPStackGroup OpENer 2.3.0 (commit 76b95cf) has an out-of-bounds read issue in Connection Manager handling of ForwardOpen requests when processing short malformed packets. An attacker can send a valid ENIP outer frame carrying a malformed CIP ForwardOpen/LargeForwardOpen request, causing the parser to continue reading fields even when request data is insufficient. This issue is remotely triggerable via network traffic and does not require authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51538 | 2 Eipstackgroup, Opener Project | 2 Opener, Opener | 2026-08-11 | 9.1 Critical |
| EIPStackGroup OpENer 2.3.0 (commit 76b95cf) suffers from an Incorrect Access Control vulnerability in its handling of encapsulation sessions. When the server processes critical encapsulation commands, it verifies whether the provided session_handle exists in the global session list, but it fails to verify whether that handle belongs to the specific TCP connection issuing the request. Because there is no strong binding between a session handle and its originating socket, any attacker on the network can use a valid session handle created by another legitimate client to bypass access controls. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73084 | 2026-08-11 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| Activepieces is an open source AI workflow automation platform. Prior to 0.83.0, the /api/redirect OAuth callback endpoint embeds the user-supplied code query parameter directly into an inline script block without proper escaping. A crafted request to /api/redirect with a malicious code value can break out of the script context and execute arbitrary JavaScript in the Activepieces origin when a logged-in user opens it. An unauthenticated attacker can access the victim's session tokens or make authenticated API calls on the victim's behalf. This issue is fixed in version 0.83.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73083 | 2026-08-11 | N/A | ||
| Activepieces is an open source AI workflow automation platform. Prior to 0.80.0, in SANDBOX_CODE_ONLY mode, the engine loads the compiled user module with importFresh(), a wrapper around Node.js require(), before the V8 isolate is applied. Top-level module code can therefore call require('child_process'), access fs, and use other Node.js APIs in the host engine process outside the sandbox. An authenticated user who can create a Code step can read environment secrets including AP_ENCRYPTION_KEY and AP_JWT_SECRET, read or write files, and reach internal services. This issue is fixed in version 0.80.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71383 | 2026-08-11 | 7.3 High | ||
| is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain limited unauthorized read and write access, causing a limited disruption to availability. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2026-21273 | 2026-08-11 | 8.7 High | ||
| is affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain unauthorized read and write access. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28707 | 2026-08-11 | N/A | ||
| Protection mechanism failure for some LLM-on-Ray before version 1.0 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires passive user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||