| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by an Insecure Security Header configuration vulnerability where the Content-Security-Policy does not define strict directives for object-src and base-uri, which could allow an attacker to exploit injection vectors such as Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) |
| HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities flaw where the application utilizes unpatched libraries or sub-components, which could allow an attacker to identify and exploit publicly known security vulnerabilities to gain unauthorized access or compromise the application. |
| HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by an Insufficient Transport Layer Protection vulnerability where data is transmitted over the network without encryption, which could allow an attacker to compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and authentication of sensitive information. |
| HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by an Improper Error Handling vulnerability where the application exposes detailed stack traces in responses, which could allow an attacker to gain insights into the application's internal structure, code logic, and environment configurations. |
| HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by an Insecure Security Header Configuration vulnerability where the application utilizes the outdated X-XSS-Protection header, which could allow an attacker to exploit browser-specific rendering flaws or bypass security controls that should instead be managed by a robust Content Security Policy (CSP). |
| HCL BigFix RunBookAI is affected by a Unvalidated Command Input / Potential Command Smuggling vulnerability. A flaw in a component's input handling was identified that could permit unauthorized command execution. |
| HCL BigFix RunBookAI is affected by a Continued availability of Less-Secure “Input Text” Vulnerability . A component contains a security weakness in its input handling implementation, increasing the risk of misconfiguration and operational errors. |
| HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where certain offering configurations may permit execution of potentially harmful SQL queries. Improper validation or restrictions on query execution could expose the system to unintended database interactions or limited information exposure under specific conditions. |
| HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where generated containers may execute binaries with root-level privileges. Running containers with root privileges may increase the potential security risk, as it grants elevated permissions within the container environment. Aligning container configurations with security best practices requires minimizing privileges and avoiding root-level execution wherever possible. |
| HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where offering images are not digitally signed. Lack of image signing may allow the use of unverified or tampered images, potentially leading to security risks such as integrity compromise or unintended behavior in the system |
| HCL Aftermarket DPC is affected by Use of Vulnerable/Outdated Versions vulnerability using which an attacker may make use of the exploits available across the internet and craft attacks against the application. |
| HCL Aftermarket DPC is affected by Internal IP Disclosure vulnerability will give attackers a clearer map of the organization’s network layout. |
| HCL Aftermarket DPC is affected by Admin Session Concurrency vulnerability using which an attacker can exploit concurrent sessions to hijack or impersonate an admin user. |
| HCL Aftermarket DPC is affected by Cross-Origin Resource Sharing vulnerability. CORS misconfigurations includes the exposure of sensitive user information to attackers, unauthorized access to APIs, and possible data manipulation or leakage. If an attacker to exploit CORS misconfiguration, they could steal sensitive data, perform actions on behalf of a legitimate user. |
| HCL Aftermarket DPC is affected by Cross Domain Script Include vulnerability where an attacker using external scripts can tamper with the DOM, altering the content or behavior of the application. Malicious scripts can steal cookies or session tokens, leading to session hijacking. |
| HCL Aftermarket DPC is affected by Banner Disclosure vulnerability where attackers gain insights into the system’s software and version details which would allow them to craft software specific attacks. |
| HCL Aftermarket DPC is affected by HTTP Response Splitting vulnerability where in depending on how the web application handles the split response, an attacker may be able to execute arbitrary commands or inject harmful content into the response.. |
| HCL Aftermarket DPC is affected by Improper Input Validation which allows an attacker to inject executable code and can carry out attacks such as XSS, SQL Injection, Command Injection etc. |
| HCL Aftermarket DPC is affected by Weak Password Policy vulnerability, which makes it easier for attackers to guess weak passwords or use brute-force techniques to gain unauthorized access to user accounts. |
| HCL Aftermarket DPC is affected by Spamming Vulnerability which can allow the actor to excessive spamming can consume server bandwidth and processing resources which may lead to Denial of Service. |
