Search Results (3225 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2025-50228 2 Cherry-toto, Jizhicms 2 Jizhicms, Jizhicms 2026-04-15 9.1 Critical
Jizhicms v2.5.4 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in User Evaluation, Message, and Comment modules.
CVE-2026-30232 2 Chartbrew, Depomo 2 Chartbrew, Chartbrew 2026-04-15 9.6 Critical
Chartbrew is an open-source web application that can connect directly to databases and APIs and use the data to create charts. Prior to 4.8.5, Chartbrew allows authenticated users to create API data connections with arbitrary URLs. The server fetches these URLs using request-promise without any IP address validation, enabling Server-Side Request Forgery attacks against internal networks and cloud metadata endpoints. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.8.5.
CVE-2026-40168 2 Gitroom, Gitroomhq 2 Postiz, Postiz-app 2026-04-15 8.2 High
Postiz is an AI social media scheduling tool. Prior to 2.21.5, the /api/public/stream endpoint is vulnerable to SSRF. Although the application validates the initially supplied URL and blocks direct private/internal hosts, it does not re-validate the final destination after HTTP redirects. As a result, an attacker can supply a public HTTPS URL that passes validation and then redirects the server-side request to an internal resource.
CVE-2026-3881 2 Performance Monitor, Wordpress 2 Performance Monitor, Wordpress 2026-04-15 5.8 Medium
The Performance Monitor WordPress plugin through 1.0.6 does not validate a parameter before making a request to it, which could allow unauthenticated users to perform SSRF attacks
CVE-2026-34515 2 Aio-libs, Aiohttp 2 Aiohttp, Aiohttp 2026-04-15 7.5 High
AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Prior to version 3.13.4, on Windows the static resource handler may expose information about a NTLMv2 remote path. This issue has been patched in version 3.13.4.
CVE-2026-2286 1 Crewai 1 Crewai 2026-04-15 9.8 Critical
CrewAI contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that enables content acquisition from internal and cloud services, facilitated by the RAG search tools not properly validating URLs provided at runtime.
CVE-2024-12801 2026-04-15 3.3 Low
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in SaxEventRecorder by QOS.CH logback version 0.1 to 1.3.14 and 1.4.0 to 1.5.12  on the Java platform, allows an attacker to forge requests by compromising logback configuration files in XML. The attacks involves the modification of DOCTYPE declaration in  XML configuration files.
CVE-2024-2796 1 Akana 1 Akana Api Platform 2026-04-15 9.3 Critical
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) was discovered in the Akana API Platform in versions prior to and including 2022.1.3. Reported by Jakob Antonsson.
CVE-2024-6922 1 Automationanywhere 1 Automation 360 2026-04-15 N/A
Automation Anywhere Automation 360 v21-v32 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in a web API component. An attacker with unauthenticated access to the Automation 360 Control Room HTTPS service (port 443) or HTTP service (port 80) can trigger arbitrary web requests from the server.
CVE-2024-13957 1 Abb 3 Aspect Enterprise, Matrix Series, Nexus Series 2026-04-15 7.6 High
SSRF Server Side Request Forgery vulnerabilities exist in ASPECT if administrator credentials become compromisedThis issue affects ASPECT-Enterprise: through 3.*; NEXUS Series: through 3.*; MATRIX Series: through 3.*.
CVE-2024-52594 2026-04-15 4.3 Medium
Gomatrixserverlib is a Go library for matrix federation. Gomatrixserverlib is vulnerable to server-side request forgery, serving content from a private network it can access, under certain conditions. The commit `c4f1e01` fixes this issue. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade should use a local firewall to limit the network segments and hosts the service using gomatrixserverlib can access.
CVE-2024-6538 1 Redhat 1 Openshift 2026-04-15 5.3 Medium
A flaw was found in OpenShift Console. A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack can happen if an attacker supplies all or part of a URL to the server to query. The server is considered to be in a privileged network position and can often reach exposed services that aren't readily available to clients due to network filtering. Leveraging such an attack vector, the attacker can have an impact on other services and potentially disclose information or have other nefarious effects on the system. The /api/dev-console/proxy/internet endpoint on the OpenShift Console allows authenticated users to have the console's pod perform arbitrary and fully controlled HTTP(s) requests. The full response to these requests is returned by the endpoint. While the name of this endpoint suggests the requests are only bound to the internet, no such checks are in place. An authenticated user can therefore ask the console to perform arbitrary HTTP requests from outside the cluster to a service inside the cluster.
CVE-2025-64180 1 Manager-io 1 Manager 2026-04-15 10 Critical
Manager-io/Manager is accounting software. In Manager Desktop and Server versions 25.11.1.3085 and below, a critical vulnerability permits unauthorized access to internal network resources. The flaw lies in the fundamental design of the DNS validation mechanism. A Time-of-Check Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) condition that allows attackers to bypass network isolation and access internal services, cloud metadata endpoints, and protected network segments. The Desktop edition requires no authentication; the Server edition requires only standard authentication. This issue is fixed in version 25.11.1.3086.
CVE-2024-54819 2026-04-15 9.1 Critical
I, Librarian before and including 5.11.1 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) due to improper input validation in classes/security/validation.php
CVE-2024-22219 1 Terminalfour 2 Terminalfour, Xml Jdbc 2026-04-15 6.3 Medium
XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in Terminalfour 8.0.0001 through 8.3.18 and XML JDBC versions up to 1.0.4 allows authenticated users to submit malicious XML via unspecified features which could lead to various actions such as accessing the underlying server, remote code execution (RCE), or performing Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks.
CVE-2023-7073 1 Creative Motion 1 Auto Featured Image 2026-04-15 6.4 Medium
The Auto Featured Image (Auto Post Thumbnail) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.1.7 via the upload_to_library AJAX action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with author-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.
CVE-2025-6242 1 Redhat 2 Ai Inference Server, Enterprise Linux Ai 2026-04-15 7.1 High
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the MediaConnector class within the vLLM project's multimodal feature set. The load_from_url and load_from_url_async methods fetch and process media from user-provided URLs without adequate restrictions on the target hosts. This allows an attacker to coerce the vLLM server into making arbitrary requests to internal network resources.
CVE-2025-8020 2026-04-15 8.2 High
All versions of the package private-ip are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) where an attacker can provide an IP or hostname that resolves to a multicast IP address (224.0.0.0/4) which is not included as part of the private IP ranges in the package's source code.
CVE-2019-25290 1 Inim 1 Smartliving Smartlan 2026-04-15 5.3 Medium
Smartliving SmartLAN/G/SI <=6.x contains an unauthenticated server-side request forgery vulnerability in the GetImage functionality through the 'host' parameter. Attackers can exploit the onvif.cgi endpoint by specifying external domains to bypass firewalls and perform network enumeration through arbitrary HTTP requests.
CVE-2025-42965 2026-04-15 4.1 Medium
SAP CMC Promotion Management allows an authenticated attacker to enumerate internal network systems by submitting crafted requests during job source configuration. By analysing response times for various IP addresses and ports, the attacker can infer valid network endpoints. Successful exploitation may lead to information disclosure. This vulnerability does not impact the integrity or availability of the application.