Export limit exceeded: 14755 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (27042 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-20303 | 1 Cisco | 2 Catalyst Sd-wan Manager, Cisco Catalyst Sd-wan Controller | 2026-08-07 | 9.9 Critical |
| As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in software hardening releases that address multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-20303 are related to improper input validation issues that are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) CWE-20. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70437 | 1 Jenkins Project | 1 Jenkins Webhook Secret Credentials Provider Plugin | 2026-08-07 | 3.7 Low |
| Jenkins Webhook Secret Credentials Provider Plugin 16.v0cfa_f0215cf5 and earlier does not use a constant-time comparison function when checking whether the provided and expected webhook bearer token are equal, potentially allowing attackers to use statistical methods to obtain a valid webhook bearer token. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10302 | 1 Wso2 | 8 Wso2 Api Control Plane, Wso2 Api Manager, Wso2 Carbon Identity Recovery Management and 5 more | 2026-08-07 | 4 Medium |
| The user self-signup flow in multiple WSO2 products fails to adequately validate user-supplied input. This weakness allows arbitrary unvalidated data to be included within user claims, which are then used by downstream processes. Allowing unvalidated input into user claims can lead to various security risks. Malicious or malformed data injected during signup could be processed by other parts of the application, potentially enabling attacks such as content manipulation, redirection, user interface inconsistencies, unauthorized actions, and data exposure. The actual impact depends on how the compromised data is consumed and the privileges associated with the affected users. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16316 | 2 Omicron Electronics, Omicron Electronics Gmbh | 2 Omicron Stationguard, Omicron Stationguard | 2026-08-07 | 4.3 Medium |
| OMICRON StationGuard 4.00 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its IEC 61850 Sampled Values (SV) frame processing. A specially crafted SV frame can cause the affected process to terminate, disrupting alert processing for Sampled Values traffic. The vulnerability does not affect overall system availability or the processing of other traffic types, and the process is automatically restarted, and the failure is immediately reported to the user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16731 | 2 Omicron Electronics, Omicron Electronics Gmbh | 2 Omicron Stationscout, Omicron Stationscout | 2026-08-07 | N/A |
| OMICRON StationScout before version 3.05 contains a cryptographic timing side-channel vulnerability in the backend authentication mechanism that may allow an unauthenticated attacker to forge valid authentication credentials, bypass authentication and authorization, and impersonate legitimate clients. An attacker can gain full access to the system configuration, allowing modification, reset, or unauthorized alteration of system parameters or injecting network traffic into the connected network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-54489 | 1 Dell | 1 Virtual Storage Integrator For Vmware Vsphere Client | 2026-08-07 | 9.1 Critical |
| Dell Virtual Storage Integrator for VMware vSphere Client, versions prior to 10.11.1.0, contain(s) a Sensitive Information Disclosure vulnerability. An unauthenticated remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to information disclosure and session hijacking. This vulnerability is considered critical as it allows an unauthenticated attacker to obtain active session credentials and fully impersonate authenticated users, including administrators. Dell recommends customers to upgrade at the earliest opportunity. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65543 | 2 Vimeodev, Wordpress | 2 Vimeo, Wordpress | 2026-08-07 | 7.5 High |
| Subscriber Sensitive Data Exposure in Vimeo <= 1.2.2 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66683 | 2 Wordpress, Wp Zone | 2 Wordpress, Custom Css And Javascript | 2026-08-07 | 5.3 Medium |
| Unauthenticated Sensitive Data Exposure in Custom CSS and JavaScript <= 2.0.16 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66685 | 2 Alex, Wordpress | 2 Featured Video Plus, Wordpress | 2026-08-07 | 5.3 Medium |
| Unauthenticated Sensitive Data Exposure in Featured Video Plus <= 2.3.3 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66696 | 2 Nexcess, Wordpress | 2 Gutenberg Blocks By Kadence Blocks, Wordpress | 2026-08-07 | 4.3 Medium |
| Contributor Sensitive Data Exposure in Gutenberg Blocks by Kadence Blocks <= 3.7.8 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16067 | 2 Event Booking Manager For Woocommerce, Wordpress | 2 Event Booking Manager For Woocommerce (pro), Wordpress | 2026-08-07 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Event Booking Manager for WooCommerce (Pro) WordPress plugin before 5.0.3 does not validate the ticket price on the server during its native (non-WooCommerce) checkout, trusting the per-ticket price supplied by the client instead of re-deriving the event's configured price. This allows unauthenticated users to book paid event tickets for free, obtaining completed bookings and valid tickets at no cost. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6541 | 1 Wso2 | 5 Micro Integrator, Wso2-synapse, Wso2 Api Manager and 2 more | 2026-08-07 | 6.8 Medium |
| The Class Mediator fails to correctly validate or sanitize `messageContext` properties when they are used to populate dynamic values. This allows authenticated users to potentially access or modify data across different system invocations that should be isolated. This weakness can lead to the disclosure of sensitive information belonging to other users or the unintended modification of system data by authenticated users. The exact impact depends on how `messageContext` properties are utilized within the affected WSO2 products. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48080 | 1 Open-reception | 1 Appointment-booking-software | 2026-08-07 | 8 High |
| OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.2, the `GET /api/tenants/{id}` endpoint returns the full tenant record to any authenticated `TENANT_ADMIN` of that tenant, including the `databaseUrl` field. This field contains the live PostgreSQL connection string the application uses to connect to that tenant's database. In the tested official `docker-compose.prod.yml` deployment, the connection string contained the user `postgres` with `rolsuper=true` and the plaintext password from `secrets/postgres_password.txt`. Operators who configure a non-superuser PostgreSQL user via `secrets/postgres_user.txt` would expose a less privileged credential, but the disclosure of the connection string itself is independent of that choice. The same credential applies to every database managed by that PostgreSQL instance: the central `appointment_booking` database, every per-tenant database (one per tenant), and the postgres administrative database. A `TENANT_ADMIN` of one tenant who can reach `postgres:5432` (directly via internal network, indirectly via any SSRF, RCE, or file-read in the application) can read every other tenant's appointment ciphertexts, key shares, and metadata; read the central user table, including all `GLOBAL_ADMIN` accounts, password hashes, and session records; modify or delete any data in any tenant database; and/or i a superuser-scoped deployment: use PostgreSQL's `pg_read_server_files`, `COPY ... FROM PROGRAM`, and `CREATE EXTENSION` for further escalation inside the database container. This breaks the per-tenant database isolation that is otherwise the primary cross-tenant control in the application. The application code carefully scopes most queries to the calling tenant's database, but those scopings are irrelevant once the attacker holds the credentials that bypass the application entirely. Version 1.0.2 fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71433 | 2 Langchain, Langchain-ai | 3 Langgraph-checkpoint-sqlite, Langgraph, Langgraph-checkpoint-postgres | 2026-08-07 | 5.3 Medium |
| LangGraph Checkpoint Postgres and SQLite Checkpoint are the Postgres and SQLite implementations of LangGraph's checkpoint saver. Prior to 3.1.1, the langgraph-checkpoint-postgres and langgraph-checkpoint-sqlite packages persisted hierarchical namespaces as a dot joined string and scoped reads by matching that string as a simple prefix pattern, so a read scoped to one namespace could also match a sibling namespace whose flattened form shares the same leading characters, or a namespace label containing unescaped pattern metacharacters, allowing an authenticated caller to retrieve stored items belonging to another tenant or user through an ordinary scoped search or list namespaces call, with no crafted input required. This issue is fixed in versions 3.1.1 of langgraph-checkpoint-postgres and langgraph-checkpoint-sqlite. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48078 | 1 Open-reception | 1 Appointment-booking-software | 2026-08-07 | 5.3 Medium |
| OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.5, the unauthenticated `/api/tenants/{id}/schedule` endpoint returns every non-archived channel for a tenant regardless of the channel's `isPublic` flag. Channels marked `isPublic = false` are intended to be invisible to public callers; the dashboard creates them deliberately to hide internal-only services from the patient booking UI. The schedule endpoint ignores the flag entirely and discloses channel names, descriptions, IDs, agent associations, pause status, confirmation requirements, and computed slot availability for the requested date range. The asymmetry between `addAppointmentToTunnel` (which enforces `eq(channel.isPublic, true)`) and the schedule endpoint (which does not) confirms the design intent: private channels exist as a real access boundary in the booking flow, just not in the schedule disclosure. Version 1.0.5 patches the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-54208 | 2026-08-07 | N/A | ||
| Tobit Laboratories AG TeamDavid's Webbox application is vulnerable to arbitrary file write, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to create or write into existing files on the server with attacker-controlled content. This is possible because user input is written directly to files without proper validation or restriction on file types. As a result, an attacker can create files (e.g., .htm), containing malicious JavaScript code. When a user accesses a file created in this way, stored cross-site scripting is triggered. This issue affects TeamDavid through Rollout 524. | ||||
| CVE-2026-54207 | 2026-08-07 | N/A | ||
| Tobit Laboratories AG TeamDavid's Webbox 's move archive functionality (“!ArcEntryMove”) accepts an arbitrary path, which can be set to network locations using UNC paths (e.g., “\\Server\Share”). The server processes these paths without validation, resulting in outbound connection attempts to attacker-controlled SMB servers. This enables au-thenticated attackers to trigger the server to authenticate to arbitrary SMB endpoints, potentially exposing NTLM authentication information (such as NTLM hashes). If outbound connections to port 445 (SMB) are permitted, attackers can use this to conduct SMB relay or credential theft attacks. Exploitation of the “pathname” parameter is possible without authentication. This issue affects TeamDavid through Rollout 524. | ||||
| CVE-2026-54206 | 2026-08-07 | N/A | ||
| Tobit Laboratories AG TeamDavid's Webbox 's sending email, fax, SMS, etc. functionality accepts a @@INCLUDE command, which can be set to network locations using UNC paths (e.g., “\\Server\Share”). The server processes these paths without validation, resulting in outbound connection attempts to attacker-controlled SMB servers. This enables authenticated attackers to trigger the server to authenticate to arbitrary SMB endpoints, potentially exposing NTLM authentication information (such as NTLM hashes). If outbound connections to port 445 (SMB) are permitted, attackers can use this to conduct SMB relay or credential theft attacks. Exploitation of the “pathname” parameter is possible without authentication. This issue affects TeamDavid through Rollout 524. | ||||
| CVE-2026-54204 | 2026-08-07 | N/A | ||
| Tobit Laboratories AG TeamDavid's Webbox 's search functionality accepts a “pathnameroot” parameter, which can be set to network locations using UNC paths (e.g., “\\Server\Share”). The server processes these paths without validation, resulting in outbound connection attempts to attacker-controlled SMB servers. This enables unauthenticated attackers to trigger the server to authenticate to arbitrary SMB endpoints, potentially exposing NTLM authentication information (such as NTLM hashes). If outbound connections to port 445 (SMB) are permitted, attackers can use this to conduct SMB relay or credential theft attacks. Exploitation of the “pathnameroot” parameter is possible without authentication. This issue affects TeamDavid through Rollout 524. | ||||
| CVE-2026-54203 | 2026-08-07 | N/A | ||
| Memory Leak to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Tobit Laboratories AG TeamDavid's Webbox allows reading of sensitive information. When accessing the URL “/.well-known/mta-sts.”, the application responds with memory. By repeatedly requesting this endpoint, an attacker can access sensitive information, including user passwords. Exploitation does not require authentication. This issue affects TeamDavid through Rollout 524. | ||||